Literature DB >> 24978089

Does bilateral sacrospinous fixation with synthetic mesh recreate nulliparous pelvic anatomy? An MRI evaluation.

Vanessa Nicolau-Toulouse1, Pari Tiwari, Terry Lee, Geoffrey William Cundiff, Roxana Geoffrion.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether the bilateral sacrospinous vault fixation (BSSVF) with synthetic, polypropylene mesh arms restores the nulliparous anatomic relationships of the vaginal vault in women with and without uterus using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: This was a prospective case series of women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) who, after BSSVF, underwent a pelvic MRI (1-13 months postoperatively). Postsurgical pelvic distances were measured from MRI scans and compared with measurements from a group of 11 nulliparous women with adequate pelvic support who underwent MRI in a previous study. Our primary outcome measure was the difference in average distance from the vault to the ischial spine among women after BSSVF when compared with the average nulliparous distances. The secondary outcome measures were the difference in average distance from the posterior fornix to the sacrum and the change in apical POP quantification parameters 6 weeks after surgery.
RESULTS: Ten women underwent MRI post-BSSVF-4 women with and 6 women without uterine preservation. In the BSSVF group, similar to the nulliparous group measurements, the average distance between the vaginal apex and the spine was 5.2 cm (SD, 0.8) (95% confidence interval, -0.6 to 0.5; P = 0.92). There was an anterior-inferior displacement of the line between the vaginal apex and the sacrum in women who underwent BSSVF. The posterior fornix was 7.4 cm (SD, 1.2) from the second sacral vertebra versus 5.6 cm (SD, 1.5) in women without POP (P < 0.01). Adequate clinical resolution of apical prolapse was confirmed in all women 6 weeks post-BSSVF.
CONCLUSIONS: The BSSVF with synthetic mesh restores the anatomy between the vagina and the ischial spines. Clinical studies are underway to compare BSSVF with standard techniques of vaginal vault prolapse repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24978089     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  5 in total

1.  Bilateral sacrospinous fixation without hysterectomy: 18-month follow-up.

Authors:  Mehmet Baki Şentürk; Hakan Güraslan; Yusuf Çakmak; Murat Ekin
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01

2.  Cervical elongation following sacrospinous hysteropexy: a case series.

Authors:  Momoe Tina Hyakutake; Geoffrey William Cundiff; Roxana Geoffrion
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Positional pelvic organ prolapse (POP) evaluation using open, weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Authors:  Boris Friedman; Lynn Stothers; Darren Lazare; Andrew Macnab
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Underestimation of pelvic organ prolapse in the supine straining position, based on magnetic resonance imaging findings.

Authors:  Anique T M Grob; Judith Olde Heuvel; Jurgen J Futterer; Diana Massop; Angelique L Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven; Frank F J Simonis; Carl H van der Vaart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Laparoscopic trans teres vault suspension, a new laparoscopic method of treatment of female genital prolapse - a preliminary report.

Authors:  Ewa Milnerowicz-Nabzdyk; Mariusz Zimmer
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2016-03-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.