Literature DB >> 24977954

Risk factors for tibial stress injuries: a case-control study.

Belinda R Beck1, Katrin Rudolph, Gordon O Matheson, A Gabrielle Bergman, Tracey L Norling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify physical and behavioral characteristics related to the incidence of tibial stress injuries (TSIs).
DESIGN: Case-control study. No clinical care was conducted.
SETTING: Research laboratories in the San Francisco (the United States) and Gold Coast (Australia) areas. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-eight patients (21 men and 27 women) with acute TSI, and 36 (16 men and 20 women) age-matched, sex-matched, height-matched, weight-matched, and activity-matched controls with no history of TSI. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Height, weight, body mass index, bone, lean and fat mass, lower limb alignment anomalies, foot type, orthotics, calcium, recent weight change, menstrual history, oral contraceptive use, medications, smoking, alcohol, sleep, training type, and intensity. Differences in continuous variables were tested using 1-way analysis of variance. Categorical variable comparisons were performed with Fisher exact test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Tibial stress injury.
RESULTS: Tibial stress injury cases had 2.7% more fat (P < 0.001) and 2.6% less muscle (P < 0.001) as well as lower trochanteric bone mineral content (BMC) (P < 0.001), lumbar spine (LS) area (P < 0.001), femoral neck BMC (P < 0.001), length (P < 0.05), area (P < 0.001), cortical width (P < 0.01), cross-sectional moment of inertia (P < 0.001), and index of bending strength (P < 0.001) than controls. Controls had lower LS BMC (P < 0.01), length (P < 0.001), and broadband ultrasound attenuation (P < 0.001). The use of orthotic insoles was more prevalent in TSI cases than controls (25% vs 5.6%, respectively; P < 0.02), as were foot anomalies (56.3% vs 27.8%, respectively; P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Tibial stress injury cases had lower lean and higher fat mass, a tendency for smaller bones, and for foot anomalies compared with uninjured matched controls. bone mineral density was normal for both groups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Enhancing lean mass and limiting gains in fat may provide some protection against TSI. Individuals with small skeletal frames are advised to increase training loads particularly gradually and to reduce training intensity at the first sign of pain in the shins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24977954     DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Sport Med        ISSN: 1050-642X            Impact factor:   3.638


  5 in total

1.  Physical Activity, Menstrual History, and Bone Microarchitecture in Female Athletes with Multiple Bone Stress Injuries.

Authors:  Sara E Rudolph; Signe Caksa; Sarah Gehman; Margaret Garrahan; Julie M Hughes; Adam S Tenforde; Kathryn E Ackerman; Mary L Bouxsein; Kristin L Popp
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2021-10-01

Review 2.  Risk Factors, Diagnosis and Management of Bone Stress Injuries in Adolescent Athletes: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Belinda Beck; Louise Drysdale
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-16

3.  Acute Effects of Gait Interventions on Tibial Loads During Running: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meghan Keast; Jason Bonacci; Aaron Fox
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 11.928

4.  Female Athlete Triad Risk Factors Are More Strongly Associated With Trabecular-Rich Versus Cortical-Rich Bone Stress Injuries in Collegiate Athletes.

Authors:  Adam S Tenforde; Nicole B Katz; Kristin L Sainani; Jennifer L Carlson; Neville H Golden; Michael Fredericson
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-09-21

5.  Common Running Musculoskeletal Injuries and Associated Factors among Recreational Gorge Marathon Runners: An Investigation from 2013 to 2018 Taroko Gorge Marathons.

Authors:  Chia-Li Hsu; Chich-Haung Yang; Jen-Hung Wang; Chung-Chao Liang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.