| Literature DB >> 24977205 |
Huicai Yang1, Guoqiang Wang1, Yan Yang2, Baolin Xue3, Binbin Wu1.
Abstract
In recent years, land use upstream of the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) has changed significantly because of the TGR project. In this study, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was examined for its ability to assess relationships between land use changes and nonpoint pollutant indexes upstream of the TGR. Results indicated that the SWAT model, calibrated with the adjusted parameters, could successfully reproduce the nonpoint indexes at the water quality monitoring sites in the two rivers. The different land use change types were shown to be sensitive to nonpoint pollutants in the study area. The land use change type from upland to water was the strongest influence on changes in total nitrogen and total phosphorus. An empirical regression equation between nonpoint indexes and different land use change types was developed for the study area by partial least squares regression (PLSR) as follows: Y = b 0 + ∑ i=1 (m) b i X i. This regression equation was useful for evaluating the influence of land use change types on changes in nonpoint pollutants over a long time period. The results from this study may be useful for the TGR management and may help to reduce nonpoint pollutant loads into downstream water bodies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24977205 PMCID: PMC3996989 DOI: 10.1155/2014/526240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Location of the study area.
Figure 2Land use maps of the Pengxi River basin in (a) 2000 and (b) 2010.
Land use type value and name.
| Value | SWAT name | Land use type |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | AGRL | Paddy field |
| 12 | RICE | Upland |
| 21 | FRSD | Forest |
| 22 | RNGB | Shrubland |
| 23 | ORCD | Orchard |
| 3 | PAST | Pasture |
| 4 | WATR | Water |
| 51 | URBN | Urban |
| 52 | URML | Rural |
Figure 3Soil maps of the Pengxi River basin.
Main data sources.
| Data | Data item | Station | Data period | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meteorological data | Maximum and minimum temperature, | Kaixian | 2001–2010 | State Meteorological Administration |
| solar radiation, | ||||
| sunshine percentage, | ||||
| weed speed, and | ||||
| relative humidity | ||||
| Precipitation | Wenquan | 2001–2010 | ||
| Guanmian | ||||
| Dajin | ||||
| Yanshui | ||||
| Yunyang | ||||
| Hexing | ||||
| Yujia | ||||
| Nanmen | ||||
| Qiaoting | ||||
| Hexing | ||||
|
| ||||
| Hydrological data | Discharge | Wenquan | 2002–2010 | Hydrological Statistical Yearbook |
| Yujia | 2001–2005, 2010 | |||
|
| ||||
| Water quality data | TN and TP | Jinguan | 2007–2009 | Water quality monitoring section |
| Zhaojia bridge | 2007–2009 | |||
List of sensitive parameters calibrated and ranges and values of major parameters used.
| Name | Description | Range | Optimum value | Sensitivity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | Max | ||||
| SDNCO1 | Denitrification threshold water content | 0.908 | 0.987 | 0.974 | 0 |
| PPERCO2 | Phosphorus percolation coefficient (10 m3/Mg) | 14.578 | 14.770 | 14.674 | 0.02 |
| RSDCO3rs | Coefficient for mineralization of the residue fresh organic nutrients | 0.052 | 0.086 | 0.070 | 0.14 |
| PHOSKD4 | Phosphorus soil partitioning coefficient | 128.810 | 133.328 | 131.069 | 0.17 |
| BC45 | Local rate constant for organic phosphorus mineralization at 20°PHC (day−1) | 0.267 | 0.283 | 0.277 | 0.21 |
| ERORGP6 | Phosphorus enrichment ratio | 1.913 | 1.929 | 1.928 | 0.23 |
| BC17 | Rate constant for biological oxidation of ammonia nitrogen at 20°C (day−1) | 0.116 | 0.128 | 0.121 | 0.23 |
| GWSOLP8 | Concentration of soluble phosphorus in groundwater contribution to streamflow from subbasin (ppm). | 0.134 | 0.152 | 0.152 | 0.24 |
| USLE_K9 | Soil erodibility factor (0.013 metric ton m2 hr/(m3-metric ton cm)) | 5.752 | 6.963 | 6.600 | 0.25 |
| CMN10 | Rate coefficient for mineralization of the humus active organic nutrients | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.26 |
| SHALLST11 | Initial depth of water in the shallow aquifer (mm H2O) | 2.773 | 2.992 | 2.989 | 0.42 |
| USLE_C12 | Minimum value for the cover and management factor | 0.028 | 0.036 | 0.032 | 0.67 |
| GW_DELAY13 | Delay time for aquifer recharge (days) | 1.584 | 1.670 | 1.608 | 0.71 |
| SPEXP14 | Exponent in sediment transport equation | 1.270 | 1.270 | 1.270 | 0.81 |
| ERORGN15 | Organic nitrogen enrichment ratio | 1.926 | 1.930 | 0.154 | 0.9 |
| REVAPMN16 | Threshold water level in shallow aquifer for revap or percolation to deep aquifer (mm H2O) | 282.438 | 291.261 | 286.850 | 0.94 |
| NPERCO17 | Nitrate percolation coefficient | 0.583 | 0.609 | 0.596 | 0.95 |
| CH_K18 | Effective hydraulic conductivity in main channel alluvium | 54.074 | 55.028 | 54.551 | 0.98 |
aSuperscripts of each parameter are their corresponding orders from the sensitivity analysis.
Simulation results of runoff in the two basins.
| Station | Simulation period |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Wenquan station | Calibration for 2002–2006 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| Validation for 2007–2010 | 0.98 | 0.99 | |
|
| |||
| Yujia station | Calibration for 2001–2002 | 0.80 | 0.81 |
| Validation for 2003–2005, 2010 | 0.93 | 0.87 | |
Simulation results of TN and TP nonpoint pollution in the two basins.
| Simulation period | TN | TP | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JG | ZJB | JG | ZJB | |||||
| r2 | Ens | r2 | Ens | r2 | Ens | r2 | Ens | |
| Calibration | 0.85 | 0.6 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.55 | 0.74 | 0.64 |
| Validation | 0.88 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.85 | 0.61 | 0.76 | 0.67 |
*JG is the water monitoring station of the Dong River basin, Jinguan; ZJB is the water monitoring station of the Puli River basin, Zhaojia bridge.
Figure 4Time series of simulated and observed daily TN and TP from 2007 to 2009 at the JG station in the Dong basin.
Figure 5Spatial variation of land use conversion from 2000 to 2010. C12–3 upland to pasture; C3-4 pasture to water; C12–4 upland to water; C3–12 pasture to upland; C11-12 paddy field to upland; C22–12 shrubland to upland; C12–22 upland to shrubland; C12–23 upland to orchard.
Figure 6Spatial variation of water quality from 2000 to 2010 (a) percent change in TN; (b) percent change in TP.
Figure 7Percentage of geographical area under positive high, modest, or negative high classes.
Spearman correlation coefficients and probabilities (P value). Correlations between percentage of land use conversion within a subbasin and water quality variables. Bold coefficients indicate significant relationships.
| 2000 | 2010 | Code | Area (km2) | P_N | P_P | D_N | D_P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upland | Pasture | 5 | 16.85 | −0.47 | −0.57* | −0.53 | −0.65 |
| 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.01 | ||||
| Pasture | Water | 12 | 18.84 | −0.21 | −0.61 | −0.15 | −0.70 |
| 0.73 | 0.28 | 0.81 | 0.19 | ||||
| Upland | Water | 15 | 12.63 | 0.81** | 0.69* | 0.64* | 0.46 |
| 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.16 | ||||
| Pasture | Upland | 30 | 17.18 | 0.32 | 0.65 | 0.45 | 0.56 |
| 0.54 | 0.16 | 0.37 | 0.24 | ||||
| Paddy field | Upland | 32 | 10.17 | −0.47 | −0.45 | −0.29 | −0.55 |
| 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.64 | 0.34 | ||||
| Shrubland | Upland | 35 | 10.70 | 0.08 | 0.85 | 0.08 | 0.21 |
| 0.85 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 0.62 | ||||
| Upland | Shrubland | 51 | 12.16 | −0.45 | −0.62* | −0.25 | −0.52 |
| 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.44 | 0.08 | ||||
| Upland | Orchard | 60 | 17.08 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.04 |
| 0.70 | 0.95 | 0.70 | 0.90 |
P_N: percent changes in total nitrogen %.
P_P: percent changes in total phosphorus %.
D_N: differences in total nitrogen (kg·ha-1).
D_P: differences in total phosphorus (kg·ha-1).
n = 23.
**P < 0.05.
*P < 0.01.
Fitted models and model performance of TN and TP changes.
| Standardized regression coefficients | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land use change types |
|
| ||
| 2000 | 2010 | code | ||
| Upland | Pasture | 5 | −0.17 | −0.32 |
| Pasture | Water | 12 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| Upland | Water | 15 | 0.33 | 0.45 |
| Pasture | Upland | 30 | 0.001 | −0.31 |
| Paddy field | Upland | 32 | −0.18 | −0.19 |
| Shrubland | Upland | 35 | −0.16 | −0.18 |
| Upland | Shrubland | 51 | −0.21 | −0.26 |
| Upland | Orchard | 60 | 0.02 | 0.30 |
|
| ||||
| Model performance | ||||
|
| 23 | 23 | ||
|
| 13.26 | 7.24 | ||
|
| 0.001 | 0.002 | ||
|
| 0.56 | 0.62 | ||
Figure 8Coefficient map of TN PLRS results.
Figure 9Coefficient map of TP PLRS results.
Figure 10Scatter plot of the fitted and cross-validated data versus the actual TN changes.
Figure 11Scatter plot of the fitted and cross-validated data versus the actual TP changes.