Tülay Dal1, Hilal Sazak1, Mehtap Tunç1, Saziye Sahin1, Aydın Yılmaz1. 1. 1 Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey ; 2 Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk Chest Disease and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey ; 3 Gazi University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Anesthesiology, Ankara, Turkey ; 4 Department of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis, Ataturk Chest Disease and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of ketamine-midazolam and ketamine-propofol combinations for procedural sedation in endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). METHODS:Sixty patients who were undergoing EBUS-TBNA were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 was given 0.25 mg/kg intravenous (iv) ketamine, 2 min later than 0.05 mg/kg iv midazolam. Group 2 received 0.125 mg/kg ketamine-propofol mixture (ketofol), 2 min subsequent to injection of 0.25 mg/kg each. Sedation was maintained with additional doses of ketamine 0.25 mg/kg, and ketofol 0.125 mg/kg each in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. Blood pressure, heart rate (HR), peripheral oxygen saturation, respiratory rate (RR), Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS), and severity of cough were recorded prior to and after administration of sedation agent in the beginning of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) and every 5 min of the procedure. The consumption of the agents, the satisfactions of the bronchoscopist and the patients, and the recovery time were also recorded. RESULTS: HR in the 10(th) min and RSS value in the 35(th) min of induction in Group 1 were higher than the other group (P<0.05). The recovery time in Group 1 was statistically longer than Group 2 (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups with respect to other parameters (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that both ketamine-midazolam and ketamine-propofol combinations for sedation during EBUS-TBNA were similarly effective and safe without remarkable side effects.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of ketamine-midazolam and ketamine-propofol combinations for procedural sedation in endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). METHODS: Sixty patients who were undergoing EBUS-TBNA were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 was given 0.25 mg/kg intravenous (iv) ketamine, 2 min later than 0.05 mg/kg iv midazolam. Group 2 received 0.125 mg/kg ketamine-propofol mixture (ketofol), 2 min subsequent to injection of 0.25 mg/kg each. Sedation was maintained with additional doses of ketamine 0.25 mg/kg, and ketofol 0.125 mg/kg each in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. Blood pressure, heart rate (HR), peripheral oxygen saturation, respiratory rate (RR), Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS), and severity of cough were recorded prior to and after administration of sedation agent in the beginning of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) and every 5 min of the procedure. The consumption of the agents, the satisfactions of the bronchoscopist and the patients, and the recovery time were also recorded. RESULTS: HR in the 10(th) min and RSS value in the 35(th) min of induction in Group 1 were higher than the other group (P<0.05). The recovery time in Group 1 was statistically longer than Group 2 (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups with respect to other parameters (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that both ketamine-midazolam and ketamine-propofol combinations for sedation during EBUS-TBNA were similarly effective and safe without remarkable side effects.
Authors: I A Du Rand; J Blaikley; R Booton; N Chaudhuri; V Gupta; S Khalid; S Mandal; J Martin; J Mills; N Navani; N M Rahman; J M Wrightson; M Munavvar Journal: Thorax Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: T Oztürk; A Cakan; G Gülerçe; G Olgaç; S Deren; A Ozsöz Journal: Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 0.698
Authors: Emily A S Bergbower; Caron Hong; Miranda Gibbons; Ashutosh Sachdeva; Peter Rock; Megan G Anders Journal: J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect Date: 2022-01-31
Authors: Nathan J Smischney; Sumedh S Hoskote; Alice Gallo de Moraes; Carlos J Racedo Africano; Perliveh M Carrera; Rudy Tedja; Jasleen K Pannu; Elizabeth C Hassebroek; Dereddi Raja S Reddy; Richard F Hinds; Lokendra Thakur Journal: Trials Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Maria Gabriela O Fernandes; Vanessa F Santos; Natália Martins; Maria C Sucena; Madalena M Passos; Maria Manuel Marques; Adriana M Magalhães; António Bugalho Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 4.241