Literature DB >> 2497697

Physical correlates of eardrum rupture.

D R Richmond1, J T Yelverton, E R Fletcher, Y Y Phillips.   

Abstract

Eardrum (tympanic membrane) rupture in humans and animals in relation to various blast pressure-time patterns was reviewed. There were few systematic studies on eardrum rupture as a consequence of blast overpressure. Most reports did not describe the area of the eardrum destroyed. The peak overpressures required to produce a 50% incidence of eardrum rupture (P50) were summarized. Most of the animal data pertained to dogs. The highest P50 for dogs, 296 kPa, was associated with smooth-rising overpressure. For complex wave patterns occurring inside open shelters subjected to nuclear blasts, the P50 was 205 kPa. For fast-rising blasts in a shock tube it was 78 kPa, and 105 kPa for statically applied pressures. The duration of the overpressure was not a factor unless it was very short. The influence of the orientation of the head to the oncoming blast was demonstrated. An ear facing the blast may receive reflected overpressures several times that for one side-on to the blast. An ear on the downstream side of the head was exposed to about the same overpressure as the side-on ear. A P50 for humans of 100 kPa and a threshold of 35 kPa has been used widely in blast criteria. A recent study suggests a threshold (P1) of about 20 kPa, and gives the overpressures required to produce minor, moderate, and major eardrum ruptures. These data were presented in the form of curves showing the overpressures as a function of duration required to inflict a P1 and a P50 of eardrum rupture of the three levels of severity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2497697     DOI: 10.1177/00034894890980s507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl        ISSN: 0096-8056


  7 in total

1.  Intracochlear pressure measurements during acoustic shock wave exposure.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Mohamed A Alhussaini; James R Easter; Theodore F Argo; Tim Walilko; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Pneumatic low-coherence interferometry otoscope to quantify tympanic membrane mobility and middle ear pressure.

Authors:  Jungeun Won; Guillermo L Monroy; Pin-Chieh Huang; Roshan Dsouza; Malcolm C Hill; Michael A Novak; Ryan G Porter; Eric Chaney; Ronit Barkalifa; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Mechanical damage of tympanic membrane in relation to impulse pressure waveform - A study in chinchillas.

Authors:  Rong Z Gan; Don Nakmali; Xiao D Ji; Kegan Leckness; Zachary Yokell
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  An insight to tympanic membrane perforation pressure through morphometry: A cadaver study.

Authors:  Derya Ümit Talas; Orhan Beger; Ülkü Çömelekoglu; Salim Çakir; Pourya Taghipour; Yusuf Vayisoglu
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 0.887

5.  Air blast injuries killed the crew of the submarine H.L. Hunley.

Authors:  Rachel M Lance; Lucas Stalcup; Brad Wojtylak; Cameron R Bass
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Primary blast wave protection in combat helmet design: A historical comparison between present day and World War I.

Authors:  Joost Op 't Eynde; Allen W Yu; Christopher P Eckersley; Cameron R Bass
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Understanding blast-induced neurotrauma: how far have we come?

Authors:  Ibolja Cernak
Journal:  Concussion       Date:  2017-06-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.