Literature DB >> 24976894

Genome sequence of the Lebeckia ambigua-nodulating "Burkholderia sprentiae" strain WSM5005(T.).

Wayne Reeve1, Sofie De Meyer1, Jason Terpolilli1, Vanessa Melino1, Julie Ardley1, Tian Rui1, Ravi Tiwari1, John Howieson1, Ron Yates2, Graham O'Hara1, Megan Lu3, David Bruce3, Chris Detter3, Roxanne Tapia3, Cliff Han3, Chia-Lin Wei3, Marcel Huntemann3, James Han3, I-Min Chen4, Konstantinos Mavromatis3, Victor Markowitz4, Ernest Szeto4, Natalia Ivanova3, Natalia Mikhailova3, Galina Ovchinnikova3, Ioanna Pagani3, Amrita Pati3, Lynne Goodwin4, Lin Peters3, Sam Pitluck3, Tanja Woyke3, Nikos Kyrpides3.   

Abstract

"Burkholderia sprentiae" strain WSM5005(T) is an aerobic, motile, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming rod that was isolated in Australia from an effective N2-fixing root nodule of Lebeckia ambigua collected in Klawer, Western Cape of South Africa, in October 2007. Here we describe the features of "Burkholderia sprentiae" strain WSM5005(T), together with the genome sequence and its annotation. The 7,761,063 bp high-quality-draft genome is arranged in 8 scaffolds of 236 contigs, contains 7,147 protein-coding genes and 76 RNA-only encoding genes, and is one of 20 rhizobial genomes sequenced as part of the DOE Joint Genome Institute 2010 Community Sequencing Program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alphaproteobacteria; nitrogen fixation; rhizobia; root-nodule bacteria

Year:  2013        PMID: 24976894      PMCID: PMC4062628          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.4558268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Legumes of the Fabaceae family of flowering plants have the unique capacity to form a symbiotic N2-fixing symbiosis with soil-inhabiting root nodule bacteria (RNB). This symbiosis supplies leguminous species with the essential bioavailable nitrogen that could otherwise not be obtained from soils that are inherently infertile. The agricultural region of south-west Western Australia contains such impoverished soils and the successful establishment of effective legume-RNB symbioses has been exploited to drive plant and animal productivity in this landscape without the reliance on nitrogenous fertilizer [1,2]. This landscape’s rainfall patterns appear to be changing, from a dry Mediterranean-type distribution to a generally reduced annual rainfall with a less predictable distribution [3]. Due to changes in rainfall patterns, the reproduction of the commercially used annual legume species is challenged. Perennial species might be more able to adapt to climate change, though few commercial perennial forage legumes are adapted to the acid and infertile soils encountered in the region [2]. Therefore, deep-rooted herbaceous perennial legumes including Rhynchosia and Lebeckia species adapted to acid and infertile soils have been investigated for use in this Australian agricultural setting [2,4,5]. The genus Lebeckia Thunb. is part of the Crotalarieae tribe, and refers to a group of 33 species of papilionoid legumes that are endemic to the southern and western parts of South Africa, which have similar soil and climate conditions to Western Australia [6,7]. This genus has recently been revised and is now subdivided into several sections, including Lebeckia s.s., Calobota and Wiborgiella [7]. The Lebeckia s.s. section, which includes L. ambigua, can easily be distinguished from other species by their acicular leaves and 5+5 anther arrangement [7-9]. In four expeditions to the Western Cape of South Africa, between 2002 and 2007, nodules and seeds of Lebeckia ambigua were collected and stored [5]. The isolation of RNB from these nodules gave rise to a collection of 23 microsymbionts that clustered into five groups within the genus [5]. Unlike most of the previously studied rhizobial strains, this South African group appears to be associated with papilionoid forage legumes (rather than Mimosa spp.). One of these strains has now been designated as the type strain of the new species “ strain WSM5005T [10]. This isolate effectively nodulates Lebeckia ambigua and L. sepiaria [5]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of general features for “ strain WSM5005T together with the description of the complete genome sequence and its annotation.

Classification and general features

“ strain WSM5005T is a motile, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming rod (Figure 1, left and center panels) in the order of the class [10]. It is fast growing, forming 2-4 mm diameter colonies within 2-3 days when grown on half Lupin Agar (½LA) [11] at 28°C. Colonies on ½LA are white-opaque, slightly domed, moderately mucoid with smooth margins (Figure 1, right panel).
Figure 1

Images of “ strain WSM5005T using scanning (Left) and transmission (Center) electron microscopy and the colony morphology on a solid medium (Right).

Images of “ strain WSM5005T using scanning (Left) and transmission (Center) electron microscopy and the colony morphology on a solid medium (Right). Minimum Information about the Genome Sequence (MIGS) is provided in Table 1. Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic relationship of “ strain WSM5005T in a 16S rRNA sequence based tree. This strain clusters closest to STM678T (CIP 108238T) and KP23T with 98.2% and 96.9% sequence identity, respectively.
Table 1

Classification and general features of “ strain WSM5005T according to the MIGS recommendations [12,13].

MIGS ID       Property        Term     Evidence code
       Current classification        Domain Bacteria     TAS [13]
        Phylum Proteobacteria     TAS [14]
        Class Betaproteobacteria     TAS [15,16]
        Order Burkholderiales     TAS [15,17]
        Family Burkholderiaceae     TAS [15,18]
        Genus Burkholderia     TAS [19-21]
        Species Burkholderia sprentiae     TAS [10]
       Gram stain        Negative     IDA [22]
       Cell shape        Rod     IDA
       Motility        Motile     IDA
       Sporulation        Non-sporulating     IDA [22]
       Temperature range        Mesophile     IDA [22]
       Optimum temperature        28°C     IDA
       Salinity        Not reported
MIGS-22       Oxygen requirement        Aerobic     IDA
       Carbon source        Not reported
       Energy source        Chemoorganotroph     IDA [22]
MIGS-6       Habitat        Soil, root nodule on host     IDA
MIGS-15       Biotic relationship        Free living, symbiotic     IDA
MIGS-14       Pathogenicity        Non-pathogenic     NAS
       Biosafety level        1     TAS [23]
       Isolation        Root nodule     IDA
MIGS-4       Geographic location        South Africa     IDA
MIGS-5       Nodule collection date        October, 2007     IDA
MIGS-4.1        Longitude        18.621111     IDA
MIGS-4.2       Latitude        -31.799722     IDA
MIGS-4.3       Depth        Not recorded
MIGS-4.4       Altitude        Not recorded

Evidence codes – IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [24].

Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree showing the relationships of “ strain WSM5005T (shown in blue print) with some of the bacteria in the order based on aligned sequences of the 16S rRNA gene (1,322 bp internal region). All sites were informative and there were no gap-containing sites. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA, version 5.05 [25]. The tree was built using the maximum likelihood method with the General Time Reversible model. Bootstrap analysis [26] with 500 replicates was performed to assess the support of the clusters. Type strains are indicated with a superscript T. Strains with a genome sequencing project registered in GOLD [27] are in bold print and the GOLD ID is mentioned after the accession number. Published genomes are designated with an asterisk.

Evidence codes – IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [24]. Phylogenetic tree showing the relationships of “ strain WSM5005T (shown in blue print) with some of the bacteria in the order based on aligned sequences of the 16S rRNA gene (1,322 bp internal region). All sites were informative and there were no gap-containing sites. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA, version 5.05 [25]. The tree was built using the maximum likelihood method with the General Time Reversible model. Bootstrap analysis [26] with 500 replicates was performed to assess the support of the clusters. Type strains are indicated with a superscript T. Strains with a genome sequencing project registered in GOLD [27] are in bold print and the GOLD ID is mentioned after the accession number. Published genomes are designated with an asterisk.

Symbiotaxonomy

“ strain WSM5005T is part of a cadre of strains that were assessed for nodulation and nitrogen fixation on three separate L. ambigua genotypes (CRSLAM-37, CRSLAM-39 and CRSLAM-41) and on L. sepiaria [5]. Representatives of this group of nodule bacteria are generally Nod+ and Fix- on Macroptillium atropurpureum and appear to have a very narrow host range for symbiosis. They belong to a group of strains that nodulate papilionoid forage legumes rather than the classical hosts Mimosa spp. (Mimosoideae) [28].

Genome sequencing and annotation information

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its environmental and agricultural relevance to issues in global carbon cycling, alternative energy production, and biogeochemical importance, and is part of the Community Sequencing Program at the U.S. Department of Energy, Joint Genome Institute (JGI) for projects of relevance to agency missions. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [27] and an improved-high-quality-draft genome sequence in IMG. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the JGI. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information for “ strain WSM5005T

MIGS ID     Property    Term
MIGS-31     Finishing quality    Improved high-quality draft
MIGS-28     Libraries used    Illumina GAii shotgun and paired end 454 libraries
MIGS-29     Sequencing platforms    Illumina HiSeq 2000 and 454 GS FLX Titanium technologies
MIGS-31.2     Sequencing coverage    8.4x 454 paired end, 300 x Illumina
MIGS-30     Assemblers    VELVET 1.013, Newbler 2.3, phrap 4.24
MIGS-32     Gene calling methods    Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
     GOLD ID    Gi06497
     GenBank ID    AXBN01000000
     Database: IMG    2510065045
     Project relevance    Symbiotic N2fixation, agriculture

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

“ strain WSM5005T was grown to mid logarithmic phase in TY rich medium [29] on a gyratory shaker at 28°C. DNA was isolated from 60 mL of cells using a CTAB (Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) bacterial genomic DNA isolation method [30].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of “ strain WSM5005T was sequenced at the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using a combination of Illumina [31] and 454 technologies [32]. An Illumina GAii shotgun library which generated 76,247,610 reads totaling 5,794.8 Mb, and a paired end 454 library with an average insert size of 13 kb which generated 612,483 reads totaling 112.9 Mb of 454 data were generated for this genome. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at [30]. The initial draft assembly contained 420 contigs in 8 scaffolds. The 454 paired end data was assembled with Newbler, version 2.3. The Newbler consensus sequences were computationally shredded into 2 kb overlapping fake reads (shreds). Illumina sequencing data were assembled with VELVET, version 1.0.13 [33], and the consensus sequences were computationally shredded into 1.5 kb overlapping fake reads (shreds). We integrated the 454 Newbler consensus shreds, the Illumina VELVET consensus shreds and the read pairs in the 454 paired end library using parallel phrap, version SPS - 4.24 (High Performance Software, LLC). The software Consed [34-36] was used in the following finishing process. Illumina data was used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using the software Polisher developed at JGI (Alla Lapidus, unpublished). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected using gapResolution (Cliff Han, unpublished), Dupfinisher [37], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR (J-F Cheng, unpublished) primer walks. A total of 352 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The estimated genome size is 7.8 Mb and the final assembly is based on 65.2 Mb of 454 draft data which provides an average 8.4× coverage of the genome and 2,340 Mb of Illumina draft data which provides an average 300× coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [38] as part of the DOE-JGI Annotation pipeline [39], followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [40]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. These data sources were combined to assert a product description for each predicted protein. Non-coding genes and miscellaneous features were predicted using tRNAscan-SE [41], RNAMMer [42], Rfam [43], TMHMM [44], and SignalP [45]. Additional gene prediction analyses and functional annotation were performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG-ER) platform [46].

Genome properties

The genome is 7,761,063 nucleotides with 63.18% GC content (Table 3) and comprised of 8 scaffolds of 236 contigs. From a total of 7,223 genes, 7,147 were protein encoding and 76 RNA only encoding genes. Within the genome, 377 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of genes (76.16%) were assigned a putative function whilst the remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4, Figure 3 and Figure 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics for “ strain WSM5005T.

Attribute    Value     % of Total
Genome size (bp)    7,761,063     100
DNA coding region (bp)    6,514,546     83.94
DNA G+C content (bp)    4,903,511     63.18
Number of scaffolds    8
Number of contigs    236
Total genes    7,223     100
RNA genes    76     1.05
Protein-coding genes    7,147     98.95
Genes with function prediction    5,501     76.16
Genes assigned to COGs    5,456     75.54
Genes assigned Pfam domains    5,800     80.30
Genes with signal peptides    687     9.51
Genes with transmembrane helices    1,634     22.62
CRISPR repeats    0
Table 4

Number of protein coding genes of “ strain WSM5005T associated with the general COG functional categories.

Code     Value       %age     Description
J     205       3.34     Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A     2       0.03     RNA processing and modification
K     566       9.22     Transcription
L     257       4.18     Replication, recombination and repair
B     1       0.02     Chromatin structure and dynamics
D     46       0.75     Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y     0       0.00     Nuclear structure
V     70       1.14     Defense mechanisms
T     313       5.10     Signal transduction mechanisms
M     409       6.66     Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N     114       1.86     Cell motility
Z     0       0.00     Cytoskeleton
W     2       0.03     Extracellular structures
U     154       2.51     Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O     185       3.01     Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C     442       7.20     Energy production conversion
G     486       7.91     Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E     576       9.38     Amino acid transport metabolism
F     96       1.56     Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H     219       3.57     Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I     288       4.69     Lipid transport and metabolism
P     282       4.59     Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q     176       2.87     Secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R     738       12.02     General function prediction only
S     515       8.38     Function unknown
-     1,767       24.46     Not in COGS
Figure 3

Graphical map of the chromosome of “ strain WSM5005T. From the bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 4

Color code for Figure 3.

Graphical map of the chromosome of “ strain WSM5005T. From the bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Color code for Figure 3.
  23 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Rfam: an RNA family database.

Authors:  Sam Griffiths-Jones; Alex Bateman; Mhairi Marshall; Ajay Khanna; Sean R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0.

Authors:  Jannick Dyrløv Bendtsen; Henrik Nielsen; Gunnar von Heijne; Søren Brunak
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing.

Authors:  D Gordon; C Abajian; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence.

Authors:  T M Lowe; S R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Constructs for insertional mutagenesis, transcriptional signal localization and gene regulation studies in root nodule and other bacteria.

Authors:  Wayne G Reeve; Ravi P Tiwari; Penelope S Worsley; Michael J Dilworth; Andrew R Glenn; John G Howieson
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.777

10.  Burkholderia spp. are the most competitive symbionts of Mimosa, particularly under N-limited conditions.

Authors:  Geoffrey N Elliott; Jui-Hsing Chou; Wen-Ming Chen; Guido V Bloemberg; Cyril Bontemps; Esperanza Martínez-Romero; Encarna Velázquez; J Peter W Young; Janet I Sprent; Euan K James
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 5.491

View more
  3 in total

1.  High-quality permanent draft genome sequence of the Lebeckia ambigua-nodulating Burkholderia sp. strain WSM4176.

Authors:  Sofie E De Meyer; Rui Tian; Rekha Seshadri; Tbk Reddy; Victor Markowitz; Natalia Ivanova; Amrita Pati; Tanja Woyke; Nikos Kyrpides; Ron Yates; John Howieson; Wayne Reeve
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2015-10-16

2.  Genome Sequence Analysis of Two Pseudomonas putida Strains to Identify a 17-Hydroxylase Putatively Involved in Sparteine Degradation.

Authors:  Andrew P Detheridge; Gareth W Griffith; David J Hopper
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  High-quality permanent draft genome sequence of the Lebeckia - nodulating Burkholderia dilworthii strain WSM3556(T).

Authors:  Sofie E De Meyer; Rui Tian; Rekha Seshadri; Natalia Ivanova; Amrita Pati; Victor Markowitz; Tanja Woyke; Ron Yates; John Howieson; Nikos Kyrpides; Wayne Reeve
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2015-09-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.