Literature DB >> 24976884

Genome sequence of the lupin-nodulating Bradyrhizobium sp. strain WSM1417.

Wayne Reeve1, Jason Terpolilli1, Vanessa Melino1, Julie Ardley1, Rui Tian1, Sofie De Meyer1, Ravi Tiwari1, Ronald Yates2, Graham O'Hara1, John Howieson1, Mohamed Ninawi1, Hazuki Teshima3, David Bruce3, Chris Detter3, Roxanne Tapia3, Cliff Han3, Chia-Lin Wei3, Marcel Huntemann3, James Han3, I-Min Chen4, Konstantinos Mavrommatis3, Victor Markowitz4, Natalia Ivanova3, Galina Ovchinnikova3, Ioanna Pagani3, Amrita Pati3, Lynne Goodwin5, Lin Peters3, Tanja Woyke3, Nikos Kyrpides3.   

Abstract

Bradyrhizobium sp. strain WSM1417 is an aerobic, motile, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming rod that was isolated from an effective nitrogen (N2) fixing root nodule of Lupinus sp. collected in Papudo, Chile, in 1995. However, this microsymbiont is a poorly effective N2 fixer with the legume host Lupinus angustifolius L.; a lupin species of considerable economic importance in both Chile and Australia. The symbiosis formed with L. angustifolius produces less than half of the dry matter achieved by the symbioses with commercial inoculant strains such as Bradyrhizobium sp. strain WSM471. Therefore, WSM1417 is an important candidate strain with which to investigate the genetics of effective N2 fixation in the lupin-bradyrhizobia symbioses. Here we describe the features of Bradyrhizobium sp. strain WSM1417, together with genome sequence information and annotation. The 8,048,963 bp high-quality-draft genome is arranged in a single scaffold of 2 contigs, contains 7,695 protein-coding genes and 77 RNA-only encoding genes, and is one of 20 rhizobial genomes sequenced as part of the DOE Joint Genome Institute 2010 Community Sequencing Program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alphaproteobacteria; nitrogen fixation; rhizobia; root-nodule bacteria

Year:  2013        PMID: 24976884      PMCID: PMC4062640          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.4518260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

The Fabaceae plant family is the third largest family of flowering plants with a unique ecological role in nitrogen (N2) fixation. This family encompasses the three subfamilies Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoideae, and Faboideae (or Papilionoideae). The legume genus Lupinus (commonly known as lupin) consists of around 280 species classified within the Genisteae tribe of the subfamily Faboideae with major centers of diversity in South and Western North America, the Andes, the Mediterranean regions, and Africa. This legume has been grown in rotations with cereals for at least 2000 years [1] and is widely distributed within the old and new worlds [2]. The grain may be easily harvested and contains the full range of essential amino acids, and because of its high concentration of sulfur containing amino acids has high feed value for stock [2]. The lupin root nodule bacteria have all been classified within the genus [3,4] with the exception of that was found to nodulate with Lupinus texensis [5]. spp. are commonly associated with the nodulation of sub-tropical and tropical legumes such as soybean [6,7]. In contrast, lupins are the only agricultural grain legume nodulated by this genus in Mediterranean-type climatic zones. Strains of lupin-nodulating are also able to nodulate the herbaceous Mediterranean legume Ornithopus (seradella) spp. In this context, lupin strains are rare microsymbionts of herbaceous and crop legumes endemic to the cool climatic regions of the world. The cultivation of lupin in these regions provides a cash crop alternative to soy. Lupinus angustifolius in particular has been extensively used to extend grain production into poor quality soils without fertilizer supplementation since fixed nitrogen can be obtained from the symbiosis with [8]. Considerable variation exists in the amount of N2 fixed in the lupin- association [8]. This is significant in agricultural ecosystems, as the benefits derived from growing lupins accrue both to the grain produced and the N2 fixed [9]. A well-grown lupin crop may fix up to 300 kg of N per ha. It is therefore important to understand the genetic constraints to optimal N2 fixation in this symbiosis. strain WSM1417 represents the lower end of the scale in strain N2 fixation capacity on L. angustifolius, and hence its genome sequence presents an opportunity to understand the genetic elements responsible for this trait. Here we present a summary classification and a set of general features for WSM1417 together with the description of the complete genome sequence and its annotation.

Classification and general features

WSM1417 is a motile, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming rod (Figure 1 Left and Center) in the order of the class . It is slow growing in laboratory culture, forming 1-2mm colonies within 7-10 days when grown on half Lupin Agar (½LA) [10] at 28°C. Colonies on ½LA are white-opaque, slightly domed, moderately mucoid with smooth margins (Figure 1C). Minimum Information about the Genome Sequence (MIGS) is provided in Table 1. Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of strain WSM1417 in a 16S rRNA sequence based tree. This strain clusters closest to LMG 22265T and LMG 6138T with 99.85% and 99.48% sequence identity, respectively.
Figure 1

Images of sp strain WSM1417 using scanning (Left) and transmission (Center) electron microscopy as well as light microscopy to visualize colony morphology on a solid medium (Right).

Table 1

Classification and general features of strain WSM1417 according to the MIGS recommendations [11,12].

MIGS ID    Property    Term   Evidence code
    Current classification    Domain Bacteria   TAS [12]
    Phylum Proteobacteria   TAS [13]
    Class Alphaproteobacteria   TAS [4,14]
    Order Rhizobiales   TAS [14,15]
    Family Bradyrhizobiaceae   TAS [14,16]
    Genus Bradyrhizobium   TAS [17]
    Species Bradyrhizobium sp.   IDA
    Gram stain    Negative   IDA
    Cell shape    Rod   IDA
    Motility    Motile   IDA
    Sporulation    Non-sporulating   NAS
    Temperature range    Mesophile   NAS
    Optimum temperature    28°C   NAS
    Salinity    Not reported
MIGS-22    Oxygen requirement    Aerobic   NAS
    Carbon source    Varied   IDA
    Energy source    Chemoorganotroph   NAS
MIGS-6    Habitat    Soil, root nodule, host   IDA
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship    Free living, symbiotic   IDA
MIGS-14    Pathogenicity    Non-pathogenic   NAS
    Biosafety level    1   TAS [18]
    Isolation    Root nodule   IDA
MIGS-4    Geographic location    Papudo, Chile   IDA
MIGS-5    Nodule collection date    1995   IDA
MIGS-4.1     Longitude    -71.452814   IDA
MIGS-4.2    Latitude    -32.521849   IDA
MIGS-4.3    Depth    Not recorded
MIGS-4.4    Altitude    Not recorded

Evidence codes – IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (i.e. first time published); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [19].

Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree showing the relationships of strain WSM1417 (shown in blue print) with some of the root nodule bacteria in the order based on aligned sequences of the 16S rRNA gene (1,334 bp internal region). All sites were informative and there were no gap-containing sites. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA, version 5.05 [20]. The tree was built using the maximum likelihood method with the General Time Reversible model. Bootstrap analysis [21] with 500 replicates was performed to assess the support of the clusters. Type strains are indicated with a superscript T. Strains with a genome sequencing project registered in GOLD [22] are in bold print and the GOLD ID is mentioned after the accession number. Published genomes are designated with an asterisk.

Images of sp strain WSM1417 using scanning (Left) and transmission (Center) electron microscopy as well as light microscopy to visualize colony morphology on a solid medium (Right). Evidence codes – IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (i.e. first time published); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [19]. Phylogenetic tree showing the relationships of strain WSM1417 (shown in blue print) with some of the root nodule bacteria in the order based on aligned sequences of the 16S rRNA gene (1,334 bp internal region). All sites were informative and there were no gap-containing sites. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA, version 5.05 [20]. The tree was built using the maximum likelihood method with the General Time Reversible model. Bootstrap analysis [21] with 500 replicates was performed to assess the support of the clusters. Type strains are indicated with a superscript T. Strains with a genome sequencing project registered in GOLD [22] are in bold print and the GOLD ID is mentioned after the accession number. Published genomes are designated with an asterisk.

Symbiotaxonomy

WSM1417 is poorly effective on L. angustifolius, producing only 45% of the dry matter compared to that achieved by the commercial inoculant strain WSM471 on this species. In contrast on L. mutabilis, WSM1417 performs much better, yielding 83% of the dry matter produced by WSM471 on this same host.

Genome sequencing and annotation information

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its environmental and agricultural relevance to issues in global carbon cycling, alternative energy production, and biogeochemical importance, and is part of the Community Sequencing Program at the U.S. Department of Energy, Joint Genome Institute (JGI) for projects of relevance to agency missions. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [22] and an improved-high-quality-draft genome sequence in IMG. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the JGI. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information for strain WSM1417.

MIGS ID    Property    Term
MIGS-31    Finishing quality    Improved high-quality draft
MIGS-28    Libraries used    Illumina GAii shotgun and paired end 454 libraries
MIGS-29    Sequencing platforms    Illumina GAii and454 GS FLX Titanium technologies
MIGS-31.2    Sequencing coverage    8.1× 454 paired end
MIGS-30    Assemblers    Velvet 1.0.13, Newbler 2.3, phrap 4.24
MIGS-32    Gene calling methods    Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
    GOLD ID    Gi06490
    NCBI project ID    61989
    Database: IMG    2507262055
    Project relevance    Symbiotic N2 fixation, agriculture

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

strain WSM1417 was grown to mid logarithmic phase in TY rich medium [23] on a gyratory shaker at 28°C. DNA was isolated from 60 mL of cells using a CTAB (Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) bacterial genomic DNA isolation method [24].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of strain WSM1417 was sequenced at the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using a combination of Illumina [25] and 454 technologies [26]. An Illumina GAii shotgun library which generated 82,690,654 reads totaling 6,284.5 Mb, and a paired end 454 library with an average insert size of 10 kb which generated 770,255 reads totaling 144.4 Mb of 454 data were generated for this genome. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at the JGI website [24]. The initial draft assembly contained 2 contigs in 1 scaffold. The 454 paired end data was assembled with Newbler, version 2.3. The Newbler consensus sequences were computationally shredded into 2 kb overlapping fake reads (shreds). Illumina sequencing data were assembled with Velvet, version 1.0.13 [27], and the consensus sequences were computationally shredded into 1.5 kb overlapping fake reads (shreds). We integrated the 454 Newbler consensus shreds, the Illumina Velvet consensus shreds and the read pairs in the 454 paired end library using parallel phrap, version SPS - 4.24 (High Performance Software, LLC). The software Consed (Ewing and Green 1998; Ewing et al. 1998; Gordon et al. 1998) was used in the following finishing process. Illumina data was used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using the software Polisher developed at JGI (Alla Lapidus, unpublished). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected using gapResolution (Cliff Han, unpublished), Dupfinisher (Han, 2006), or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR (J-F Cheng, unpublished) primer walks. A total of 126 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The estimated genome size is 8.1 Mb and the final assembly is based on 65.8 Mb of 454 draft data, which provides an average 8.1× coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [28] as part of the DOE-JGI Annotation pipeline [29], followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [30]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. These data sources were combined to assert a product description for each predicted protein. Non-coding genes and miscellaneous features were predicted using tRNAscan-SE [31], RNAMMer [32], Rfam [33], TMHMM [34], and SignalP [35]. Additional gene prediction analyses and functional annotation were performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG-ER) platform [24,36].

Genome properties

The genome is 8,048,963 nucleotides with 63.16% GC content (Table 3) and comprised of a single scaffold of two contigs. From a total of 7,772 genes, 7,695were protein encoding and 77 RNA only encoding genes. Within the genome, 272 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of genes (74.03%) were assigned a putative function whilst the remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4 and Figure 3.
Table 3

Genome statistics for strain WSM1417.

Attribute    Value     % of Total
Genome size (bp)    8,048,963     100.00
DNA coding region (bp)    6,769,978     84.11
DNA G+C content (bp)    5,084,093     63.16
Number of scaffolds    1
Number of contigs    2
Total genes    7,772     100.00
RNA genes    77     0.99
rRNA operons    1
Protein-coding genes    7,695     99.01
Genes with function prediction    5,754     74.03
Genes assigned to COGs    5,704     73.39
Genes assigned Pfam domains    6,011     77.34
Genes with signal peptides    872     11.22
Genes with transmembrane helices    1,826     23.49
CRISPR repeats    0
Table 4

Number of protein coding genes of WSM1417 associated with the general COG functional categories.

Code    Value    %age     COG Category
J    202    3.15     Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    3    0.05     RNA processing and modification
K    430    6.71     Transcription
L    283    4.42     Replication, recombination and repair
B    2    0.03     Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    37    0.58     Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y    0    0.00     Nuclear structure
V    90    1.40     Defense mechanisms
T    354    5.53     Signal transduction mechanisms
M    315    4.92     Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N    130    2.03     Cell motility
Z    1    0.02     Cytoskeleton
W    0    0.00     Extracellular structures
U    138    2.15     Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O    210    3.28     Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    417    6.51     Energy production conversion
G    431    6.73     Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    678    10.58     Amino acid transport metabolism
F    90    1.40     Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    235    3.67     Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    332    5.18     Lipid transport and metabolism
P    331    5.17     Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    244    3.81     Secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    793    12.38     General function prediction only
S    660    10.30     Function unknown
-    2,068    26.61     Not in COGS
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome of strain WSM1417. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Graphical circular map of the chromosome of strain WSM1417. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  20 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Rfam: an RNA family database.

Authors:  Sam Griffiths-Jones; Alex Bateman; Mhairi Marshall; Ajay Khanna; Sean R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Solexa Ltd.

Authors:  Simon Bennett
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0.

Authors:  Jannick Dyrløv Bendtsen; Henrik Nielsen; Gunnar von Heijne; Søren Brunak
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence.

Authors:  T M Lowe; S R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Constructs for insertional mutagenesis, transcriptional signal localization and gene regulation studies in root nodule and other bacteria.

Authors:  Wayne G Reeve; Ravi P Tiwari; Penelope S Worsley; Michael J Dilworth; Andrew R Glenn; John G Howieson
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.777

10.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  1 in total

1.  Site-Specific Conditions Change the Response of Bacterial Producers of Soil Structure-Stabilizing Agents Such as Exopolysaccharides and Lipopolysaccharides to Tillage Intensity.

Authors:  Barbara Cania; Gisle Vestergaard; Marjetka Suhadolc; Rok Mihelič; Maike Krauss; Andreas Fliessbach; Paul Mäder; Anna Szumełda; Michael Schloter; Stefanie Schulz
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 5.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.