Literature DB >> 24976648

An Interactional Model of the Call for Survey Participation: Actions and Reactions in the Survey Recruitment Call.

Nora Cate Schaeffer1, Dana Garbarski1, Jeremy Freese1, Douglas W Maynard1.   

Abstract

Previous research has proposed that the actions of sample members may provide encouraging, discouraging, or ambiguous interactional environments for interviewers soliciting participation in surveys. In our interactional model of the recruitment call that brings together the actions of interviewers and sample members, we examine features of actions that may contribute to an encouraging or discouraging environment in the opening moments of the call. Using audio recordings from the 2004 wave of the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study and an innovative design that controls for sample members' estimated propensity to participate in the survey, we analyze an extensive set of interviewers' and sample members' actions, the characteristics of those actions, and their sequential location in the interaction. We also analyze whether a sample member's subsequent actions (e.g., a question about the length of the interview or a "wh-type" question) constitute an encouraging, discouraging, or ambiguous environment within which the interviewer must produce her next action. Our case-control design allows us to analyze the consequences of actions for the outcome of the call.

Year:  2013        PMID: 24976648      PMCID: PMC4072894          DOI: 10.1093/poq/nft006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Opin Q        ISSN: 0033-362X


  8 in total

1.  Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration.

Authors:  R M Groves; E Singer; A Corning
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

2.  How social processes distort measurement: the impact of survey nonresponse on estimates of volunteer work in the United States.

Authors:  Katharine G Abraham; Stanley Presser; Sara Helms
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2009-01

3.  Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice.

Authors:  D B Rubin; N Thomas
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Are Interactional Behaviors Exhibited When the Self-Reported Health Question is Asked Associated with Health Status?

Authors:  Dana Garbarski; Nora Cate Schaeffer; Jennifer Dykema
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2011-07-01

5.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Disfluency rates in conversation: effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender.

Authors:  H Bortfeld; S D Leon; J E Bloom; M F Schober; S E Brennan
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.500

7.  Requests, Blocking Moves, and Rational (Inter)action in Survey Introductions.

Authors:  Douglas W Maynard; Jeremy Freese; Nora Cate Schaeffer
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  2010-10

Review 8.  Toward a theory of motivational interviewing.

Authors:  William R Miller; Gary S Rose
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2009-09
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Asking to Speak to Another: A Skill for Soliciting Survey Participation.

Authors:  Douglas W Maynard; Matthew M Hollander
Journal:  Res Lang Soc Interact       Date:  2014

2.  Interviewing Practices, Conversational Practices, and Rapport: Responsiveness and Engagement in the Standardized Survey Interview.

Authors:  Dana Garbarski; Nora Cate Schaeffer; Jennifer Dykema
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2016-09-20

3.  Interaction Before and During the Survey Interview: Insights from Conversation Analysis.

Authors:  Nora Cate Schaeffer
Journal:  Int J Soc Res Methodol       Date:  2020-09-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.