David L Wood1, Gregory S Sawicki2, M David Miller3, Carmen Smotherman4, Katryne Lukens-Bull5, William C Livingood4, Maria Ferris6, Dale F Kraemer7. 1. Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine-Jacksonville, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Fla; Center for Health Equity and Quality Research, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Fla. Electronic address: david.wood@jax.ufl.edu. 2. Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. 3. School of Human Development and Organizational Studies, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla. 4. Center for Health Equity and Quality Research, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Fla. 5. Duval County Health Department, Florida Department of Health, Jacksonville, Fla. 6. University of North Carolina Kidney Center at Chapel Hill, NC. 7. Department of Neurology, College of Medicine-Jacksonville, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Fla.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: National consensus statements recommend that providers regularly assess the transition readiness skills of adolescent and young adults (AYA). In 2010 we developed a 29-item version of Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ). We reevaluated item performance and factor structure, and reassessed the TRAQ's reliability and validity. METHODS: We surveyed youth from 3 academic clinics in Jacksonville, Florida; Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Boston, Massachusetts. Participants were AYA with special health care needs aged 14 to 21 years. From a convenience sample of 306 patients, we conducted item reduction strategies and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). On a second convenience sample of 221 patients, we conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha and criterion validity. Analyses were conducted by the Wilcoxon rank sum test and mixed linear models. RESULTS: The item reduction and EFA resulted in a 20-item scale with 5 identified subscales. The CFA conducted on a second sample provided a good fit to the data. The overall scale has high reliability overall (Cronbach's alpha = .94) and good reliability for 4 of the 5 subscales (Cronbach's alpha ranging from .90 to .77 in the pooled sample). Each of the 5 subscale scores were significantly higher for adolescents aged 18 years and older versus those younger than 18 (P < .0001) in both univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The 20-item, 5-factor structure for the TRAQ is supported by EFA and CFA on independent samples and has good internal reliability and criterion validity. Additional work is needed to expand or revise the TRAQ subscales and test their predictive validity.
OBJECTIVE: National consensus statements recommend that providers regularly assess the transition readiness skills of adolescent and young adults (AYA). In 2010 we developed a 29-item version of Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ). We reevaluated item performance and factor structure, and reassessed the TRAQ's reliability and validity. METHODS: We surveyed youth from 3 academic clinics in Jacksonville, Florida; Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Boston, Massachusetts. Participants were AYA with special health care needs aged 14 to 21 years. From a convenience sample of 306 patients, we conducted item reduction strategies and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). On a second convenience sample of 221 patients, we conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha and criterion validity. Analyses were conducted by the Wilcoxon rank sum test and mixed linear models. RESULTS: The item reduction and EFA resulted in a 20-item scale with 5 identified subscales. The CFA conducted on a second sample provided a good fit to the data. The overall scale has high reliability overall (Cronbach's alpha = .94) and good reliability for 4 of the 5 subscales (Cronbach's alpha ranging from .90 to .77 in the pooled sample). Each of the 5 subscale scores were significantly higher for adolescents aged 18 years and older versus those younger than 18 (P < .0001) in both univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The 20-item, 5-factor structure for the TRAQ is supported by EFA and CFA on independent samples and has good internal reliability and criterion validity. Additional work is needed to expand or revise the TRAQ subscales and test their predictive validity.
Authors: Lauren E Wisk; Jonathan A Finkelstein; Sara L Toomey; Gregory S Sawicki; Mark A Schuster; Alison A Galbraith Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Gregory S Sawicki; Katharine C Garvey; Sara L Toomey; Kathryn A Williams; Yuefan Chen; J Lee Hargraves; Jessica Leblanc; Mark A Schuster; Jonathan A Finkelstein Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Lewis L Hsu; Nancy S Green; E Donnell Ivy; Cindy E Neunert; Arlene Smaldone; Shirley Johnson; Sheila Castillo; Amparo Castillo; Trevor Thompson; Kisha Hampton; John J Strouse; Rosalyn Stewart; TaLana Hughes; Sonja Banks; Kim Smith-Whitley; Allison King; Mary Brown; Kwaku Ohene-Frempong; Wally R Smith; Molly Martin Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Ryan J Coller; Sarah Ahrens; Mary L Ehlenbach; Kristin A Shadman; Mala Mathur; Kristin Caldera; Paul J Chung; Andrew LaRocque; Heather Peto; Kole Binger; Windy Smith; Ann Sheehy Journal: Hosp Pediatr Date: 2020-08-05