Literature DB >> 24976192

Brain magnetic resonance imaging: perception and expectations of neurologists, neurosurgeons and psychiatrists.

Paulo Branco1, Margarida Ayres-Basto2, Pedro Portugal3, Isabel Ramos4, Daniela Seixas5.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has rapidly become an essential diagnostic tool in modern medicine. Understanding the objectives, perception and expectations of the different medical specialties towards MRI is therefore important to improve the quality of the examinations. Our aim was to better comprehend the reasons and expectations of neurologists, neurosurgeons and psychiatrists when requesting brain MRI scans for their patients, and also to perceive the degree of confidence of these specialists in the images and respective reports. Sixty-three specialists were recruited from two tertiary hospitals and answered a tailored questionnaire. Neurosurgeons were more concerned with the images themselves; neurologists lacked confidence in both MRI images and reports, and one third of the psychiatrists only read the report and were the most confident of the specialties in MRI findings. These results possibly reflect the idiosyncrasies of each of these medical specialties. This knowledge, driven by efficient communication between neuroradiologists and neurosurgeons, neurologists and psychiatrists, may contribute to improve the quality of MRI examinations and consequently patient care and management of health resources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethics; interdisciplinary communication; magnetic resonance imaging; neurology; neurosurgery; psychiatry; radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24976192      PMCID: PMC4202898          DOI: 10.15274/NRJ-2014-10051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiol J        ISSN: 1971-4009


  11 in total

1.  Relationships between radiologists and clinicians: results from three surveys.

Authors:  L Dalla Palma; F Stacul; S Meduri; J T Geitung
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Radiology reporting: a general practitioner's perspective.

Authors:  F M Grieve; A A Plumb; S H Khan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  The radiology report--are we getting the message across?

Authors:  A Wallis; P McCoubrie
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 4.  National initiatives for measuring quality performance for the practicing neuroradiologist.

Authors:  Nikesh Anumula; Pina C Sanelli
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 5.  Combating overutilization: radiology benefits managers versus order entry decision support.

Authors:  David M Yousem
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Radiology reporting: attitudes of referring physicians.

Authors:  N J Clinger; T B Hunter; B J Hillman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Twenty years of functional MRI: the science and the stories.

Authors:  Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Neuroimaging in psychiatry: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  David E J Linden; Andreas J Fallgatter
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Making sense of neuroimaging in psychiatry.

Authors:  G S Malhi; J Lagopoulos
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 6.392

10.  Quality assurance of neuroradiology in a District General Hospital.

Authors:  M O McCarron; C Sands; P McCarron
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2006-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.