Literature DB >> 24976070

Response of the sand fly Phlebotomuspapatasi to visual, physical and chemical attraction features in the field.

Günter C Müller1, Jerome A Hogsette2, Daniel L Kline2, John C Beier3, Edita E Revay4, Rui-De Xue5.   

Abstract

In this study, 27 CDC traps were modified with various attractive features and compared with a CDC trap with no light source or baits to evaluate the effects on attraction to Phlebotomus papatasi (Scopoli) north of the Dead Sea near Jericho. Attractive features included CO2, lights, colored trap bodies, heat, moisture, chemical lures and different combinations of the same. Traps were placed 20m apart and rotated from one trap location to the next after 24h trapping periods. The most significant attractive feature was CO2, which attracted more sand flies than any other feature evaluated. Ultraviolet light was the next most attractive feature, followed by incandescent light. When evaluated alone, black or white trap bodies, heat and moisture, all influenced trap catch but effects were greater when these attractive features were used together. The results of this study suggest that traps with CO2 and UV light could be used in batteries as control interventions if suitable CO2 sources become available.
Copyright © 2014 Z. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDC traps; CO(2); Sand flies; UV light; Visual preference

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24976070     DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Trop        ISSN: 0001-706X            Impact factor:   3.112


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of light-emitting diodes as attractant for sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) in northeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Francinaldo Soares Silva; Jefferson Mesquita Brito; Benedita Maria Costa Neta; Shelre Emile Pereira Duarte Lobo
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.743

2.  Do Different LED Colours Influence Sand Fly Collection by Light Trap in the Mediterranean?

Authors:  Gabriella Gaglio; Ettore Napoli; Francesca Arfuso; Jessica Maria Abbate; Salvatore Giannetto; Emanuele Brianti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Understanding sand fly sampling methods: sticky traps are attraction-based and not interceptive sampling tools of Phlebotomus orientalis.

Authors:  Dia-Eldin Elnaiem; Altayeb Khogali; Bashir Alsharif; Osman Dakein; Tayseer Jibreel; Mohamed Hassan; Hassan H Edries; Hanan Elhadi; Bakri Elnur; Omran F Osman; Margriet den Boer; Jorge Alvar; Noteila M Khalid
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Diel periodicity and visual cues guide oviposition behavior in Phlebotomus papatasi, vector of old-world cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Tatsiana Shymanovich; Lindsey Faw; Nima Hajhashemi; Jimmie Teague; Coby Schal; Loganathan Ponnusamy; Charles S Apperson; Eduardo Hatano; Gideon Wasserberg
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2019-03-05

Review 5.  Artificial light and biting flies: the parallel development of attractive light traps and unattractive domestic lights.

Authors:  Roksana Wilson; Andrew Wakefield; Nicholas Roberts; Gareth Jones
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.047

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.