Literature DB >> 24975984

Time-related changes in the prognostic significance of the total number of examined lymph nodes in node-negative pancreatic head cancer.

Ana L Gleisner1, Gaya Spolverato, Aslam Ejaz, Timothy M Pawlik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of study was to assess time trends in the association between the total number of lymph nodes examined (TNLE) and survival in patients operated for adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas.
METHODS: Patients operated for node-negative adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas between 1988 and 2007 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2002 were compared to those diagnosed between 2003 and 2007.
RESULTS: A total of 3,406 patients were included. Although TNLE was associated with survival, the effect was not uniform. Compared to patients with >12 TNLE, survival decreased with lower TNLE (4-12 TNLE: hazard ratio [HR] 1.27, 95% CI 1.10-1.46; <4 TNLE: HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.20-1.60) among patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2002. In contrast, for those diagnosed between 2003 and 2007, while there was decreased survival for those with <4 nodes (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.22-1.71), no effect was seen for patients with TNLE 4-12 (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.85-1.14).
CONCLUSION: The prognostic significance of the TNLE in patients operated for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas is not constant over time.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lymph node; pancreatic cancer; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24975984     DOI: 10.1002/jso.23715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  5 in total

1.  Lymph Node Evaluation for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Its Value as a Quality Metric.

Authors:  Erin E Burke; Schelomo Marmor; Beth A Virnig; Todd M Tuttle; Eric H Jensen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Number of Nodes Examined and Optimal Lymph Node Prognostic Scheme.

Authors:  Fabio Bagante; Thuy Tran; Gaya Spolverato; Andrea Ruzzenente; Stefan Buttner; Cecilia G Ethun; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Simone Conci; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Gerardo Vitiello; Jan N M IJzermans; Shishir K Maithel; George Poultsides; Alfredo Guglielmi; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Number of evaluated lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and log odds evaluation in early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: numerology or valid indicators of patient outcome?

Authors:  G Lahat; N Lubezky; F Gerstenhaber; E Nizri; M Gysi; M Rozenek; Y Goichman; I Nachmany; R Nakache; I Wolf; J M Klausner
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Surgery for elderly patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, a comparison with non-surgical treatments: a retrospective study outcomes of resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Hyeong Min Park; Sang-Jae Park; Sung-Sik Han; Seoung Hoon Kim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Prognostic impact of lymph node status in patients after total pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A strobe-compliant study.

Authors:  Zhen-Jiang Zheng; Mo-Jin Wang; Chun-Lu Tan; Yong-Hua Chen; Jie Ping; Xu-Bao Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.