Literature DB >> 24975863

Foundations of resilience thinking.

Charles G Curtin1, Jessica P Parker.   

Abstract

Through 3 broad and interconnected streams of thought, resilience thinking has influenced the science of ecology and natural resource management by generating new multidisciplinary approaches to environmental problem solving. Resilience science, adaptive management (AM), and ecological policy design (EPD) contributed to an internationally unified paradigm built around the realization that change is inevitable and that science and management must approach the world with this assumption, rather than one of stability. Resilience thinking treats actions as experiments to be learned from, rather than intellectual propositions to be defended or mistakes to be ignored. It asks what is novel and innovative and strives to capture the overall behavior of a system, rather than seeking static, precise outcomes from discrete action steps. Understanding the foundations of resilience thinking is an important building block for developing more holistic and adaptive approaches to conservation. We conducted a comprehensive review of the history of resilience thinking because resilience thinking provides a working context upon which more effective, synergistic, and systems-based conservation action can be taken in light of rapid and unpredictable change. Together, resilience science, AM, and EPD bridge the gaps between systems analysis, ecology, and resource management to provide an interdisciplinary approach to solving wicked problems.
© 2014 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diseño de políticas; adaptive management; complex systems; estabilidad; gestión adaptativa; policy design; resilience; resiliencia; sistemas complejos; stability; sustainability; sustentabilidad

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24975863     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  6 in total

1.  A quantitative framework for assessing ecological resilience.

Authors:  Didier L Baho; Craig R Allen; Ahjond S Garmestani; Hannah B Fried-Petersen; Sophia E Renes; Lance H Gunderson; David G Angeler
Journal:  Ecol Soc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.403

2.  Natural biotic resources in LCA: Towards an impact assessment model for sustainable supply chain management.

Authors:  Eleonora Crenna; Sara Sozzo; Serenella Sala
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 9.297

Review 3.  A general neurologist's perspective on the urgent need to apply resilience thinking to the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Grazyna Pomorska; Judith K Ockene
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2017-09-12

4.  Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement.

Authors:  David G Angeler; Craig R Allen; Ahjond Garmestani; Kevin L Pope; Dirac Twidwell; Mirco Bundschuh
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Guiding restoration of riparian ecosystems degraded by plant invasions: Insights from a complex social-ecological system in the Global South.

Authors:  Nicola S du Plessis; Alanna J Rebelo; David M Richardson; Karen J Esler
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 5.129

6.  Agro-ecosystem sensitivity to climate change over the Ethiopian highlands in a watershed of Lake Tana sub-basin.

Authors:  Mintesinot Azene Taye
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-07-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.