James F Burke1, Vicki A Freedman2, Lynda D Lisabeth2, Devin L Brown2, Adrianne Haggins2, Lesli E Skolarus2. 1. From the Stroke Program (J.F.B., L.D.L., D.L.B., L.E.S.), Institute for Social Research (V.A.F.), and Departments of Epidemiology (L.D.L.) and Emergency Medicine (A.H.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. jamesbur@umich.edu. 2. From the Stroke Program (J.F.B., L.D.L., D.L.B., L.E.S.), Institute for Social Research (V.A.F.), and Departments of Epidemiology (L.D.L.) and Emergency Medicine (A.H.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize racial differences in disability among older stroke survivors. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 806 self-reported stroke survivors from the 2011 National Health and Aging Trends Study was performed. Race was based on self-report. Primary outcome was activity limitations (requiring assistance with mobility, self-care, and household activities). Secondary outcome was participation restrictions, which were defined as reductions/absence in valued social activities because of health. Physical capacity was measured by a validated scale (0 low-12 high). Logistic regression was used to estimate average marginal effects of activity limitations and participation restrictions by race before and after adjusting for sociodemographics, comorbidities, and physical and cognitive capacity. RESULTS: Non-Hispanic black participants had lower physical capacity than non-Hispanic white participants (mean 5.1 vs 6.9, p < 0.01). For most activities, black participants had significantly greater limitations than white participants. These differences persisted after accounting for sociodemographic factors and comorbidities, but largely became nonsignificant after accounting for physical capacity. The only unadjusted racial difference in participation restriction was in religious service attendance (18.2% of white participants vs 28.6% of black participants, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: After stroke, black individuals have a greater prevalence of activity limitations than white individuals, largely due to their greater physical capacity limitations. Further understanding of the causes of racial differences in capacity after stroke is needed to reduce activity limitations after stroke and decrease racial disparities.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize racial differences in disability among older stroke survivors. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 806 self-reported stroke survivors from the 2011 National Health and Aging Trends Study was performed. Race was based on self-report. Primary outcome was activity limitations (requiring assistance with mobility, self-care, and household activities). Secondary outcome was participation restrictions, which were defined as reductions/absence in valued social activities because of health. Physical capacity was measured by a validated scale (0 low-12 high). Logistic regression was used to estimate average marginal effects of activity limitations and participation restrictions by race before and after adjusting for sociodemographics, comorbidities, and physical and cognitive capacity. RESULTS: Non-Hispanic black participants had lower physical capacity than non-Hispanic white participants (mean 5.1 vs 6.9, p < 0.01). For most activities, black participants had significantly greater limitations than white participants. These differences persisted after accounting for sociodemographic factors and comorbidities, but largely became nonsignificant after accounting for physical capacity. The only unadjusted racial difference in participation restriction was in religious service attendance (18.2% of white participants vs 28.6% of black participants, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: After stroke, black individuals have a greater prevalence of activity limitations than white individuals, largely due to their greater physical capacity limitations. Further understanding of the causes of racial differences in capacity after stroke is needed to reduce activity limitations after stroke and decrease racial disparities.
Authors: Dawn Kleindorfer; Joseph Broderick; Jane Khoury; Matthew Flaherty; Daniel Woo; Kathleen Alwell; Charles J Moomaw; Alexander Schneider; Rosie Miller; Rakesh Shukla; Brett Kissela Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-08-31 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Yuji Okura; Lynn H Urban; Douglas W Mahoney; Steven J Jacobsen; Richard J Rodeheffer Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Vicki A Freedman; Judith D Kasper; Jennifer C Cornman; Emily M Agree; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Vincent Mor; Brenda C Spillman; Robert Wallace; Douglas A Wolf Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: R L Sacco; B Boden-Albala; R Gan; X Chen; D E Kargman; S Shea; M C Paik; W A Hauser Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1998-02-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Virginia J Howard; Dawn O Kleindorfer; Suzanne E Judd; Leslie A McClure; Monika M Safford; J David Rhodes; Mary Cushman; Claudia S Moy; Elsayed Z Soliman; Brett M Kissela; George Howard Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Kurt Kroenke; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams; Patrick O Monahan; Bernd Löwe Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-03-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: David L Roth; Orla C Sheehan; Jin Huang; James D Rhodes; Suzanne E Judd; Meredith Kilgore; Brett Kissela; Janet Prvu Bettger; William E Haley Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Kimon L H Ioannides; Avi Baehr; David N Karp; Douglas J Wiebe; Brendan G Carr; Daniel N Holena; M Kit Delgado Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Robert J Adams; Charles Ellis; Gayenell Magwood; Mark S Kindy; Leonardo Bonilha; Daniel T Lackland Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Suzanne Perea Burns; Brandi M White; Gayenell Magwood; Charles Ellis; Ayaba Logan; Joy N Jones Buie; Robert J Adams Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Lesli E Skolarus; Lynda D Lisabeth; James F Burke; Deborah A Levine; Lewis B Morgenstern; Linda S Williams; Paul N Pfeiffer; Devin L Brown Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2015 Impact factor: 1.847