BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) strain is a potentially useful prognostic marker in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, published reports regarding the accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE)-derived RV strain against an independent reference in this patient population are limited. The aims of this study were: (1) to study the relationship between 2DE RV longitudinal strain and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived RV ejection fraction (RVEF) in patients with PAH; (2) to compare 2DE-derived and CMR-derived RV longitudinal strain in these patients; and (3) to determine the reproducibility of these measurements. METHODS: Thirty patients with PAH underwent 2DE and CMR imaging within a 2-hour time period. 2DE RV longitudinal strain was measured from a focused RV apical four-chamber view using speckle tracking software. CMR RV longitudinal strain was measured from short-axis slices acquired using fast-strain-encoded sequence. Global peak systolic RV longitudinal strain was calculated for both 2DE and CMR. RESULTS: RV longitudinal strain using 2DE software correlated well with CMR-derived RVEF (R = 0.69, P = 0.0006). There was moderate agreement when comparing 2DE to CMR RV longitudinal strain (R = 0.74, P = 0.0002; bias -1%, limits of agreement -9 to 7%). Inter-observer variability and intra-observer variability for RV longitudinal strain were lower for 2DE than CMR. CONCLUSIONS: RV longitudinal strain by 2DE provides a good alternative for CMR-derived RVEF in patients with PAH. The moderate agreement in strain measurements between 2DE and CMR suggests that further software improvements are needed before these measurements can be used interchangeably in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) strain is a potentially useful prognostic marker in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, published reports regarding the accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE)-derived RV strain against an independent reference in this patient population are limited. The aims of this study were: (1) to study the relationship between 2DE RV longitudinal strain and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived RV ejection fraction (RVEF) in patients with PAH; (2) to compare 2DE-derived and CMR-derived RV longitudinal strain in these patients; and (3) to determine the reproducibility of these measurements. METHODS: Thirty patients with PAH underwent 2DE and CMR imaging within a 2-hour time period. 2DE RV longitudinal strain was measured from a focused RV apical four-chamber view using speckle tracking software. CMR RV longitudinal strain was measured from short-axis slices acquired using fast-strain-encoded sequence. Global peak systolic RV longitudinal strain was calculated for both 2DE and CMR. RESULTS: RV longitudinal strain using 2DE software correlated well with CMR-derived RVEF (R = 0.69, P = 0.0006). There was moderate agreement when comparing 2DE to CMR RV longitudinal strain (R = 0.74, P = 0.0002; bias -1%, limits of agreement -9 to 7%). Inter-observer variability and intra-observer variability for RV longitudinal strain were lower for 2DE than CMR. CONCLUSIONS: RV longitudinal strain by 2DE provides a good alternative for CMR-derived RVEF in patients with PAH. The moderate agreement in strain measurements between 2DE and CMR suggests that further software improvements are needed before these measurements can be used interchangeably in clinical practice.
Authors: Augusto Alberto da Costa Junior; Jaquelina Sonoe Ota-Arakaki; Roberta Pulcheri Ramos; Marly Uellendahl; Frederico José Neves Mancuso; Manuel Adan Gil; Cláudio Henrique Fischer; Valdir Ambrosio Moises; Antonio Carlos de Camargo Carvalho; Orlando Campos Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Benjamin H Freed; Jeremy D Collins; Christopher J François; Alex J Barker; Michael J Cuttica; Naomi C Chesler; Michael Markl; Sanjiv J Shah Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-06
Authors: Anna Calleja; Frédéric Poulin; Ciril Khorolsky; Masoud Shariat; Philippe L Bedard; Eitan Amir; Harry Rakowski; Michael McDonald; Diego Delgado; Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan Journal: J Oncol Date: 2015-08-03 Impact factor: 4.375
Authors: Rachel K Hopper; Yan Wang; Valerie DeMatteo; Ashley Santo; Steven M Kawut; Okan U Elci; Brian D Hanna; Laura Mercer-Rosa Journal: Pulm Circ Date: 2018-02-26 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: Jennifer Erley; Radu Tanacli; Davide Genovese; Natalie Tapaskar; Nina Rashedi; Paulius Bucius; Keigo Kawaji; Ilya Karagodin; Roberto M Lang; Sebastian Kelle; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 5.364