Literature DB >> 2497566

Algorithms for evaluating the appropriateness of blood transfusion.

C Coffin1, K Matz, E Rich.   

Abstract

Medicare regulations and the guidelines of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations require assessment of the appropriateness of transfusions by a hospital committee. A set of criteria maps for component transfusion review by nurses or technical personnel was designed, tested, and modified. The algorithms were based on written guidelines developed by a group of physicians. In the first part of the study, 196 medical records of patients from medical and surgical diagnosis-related groups with the highest utilization of blood (Group I) were screened. Forty patients were excluded because of a preexisting transfusion protocol. Of the remaining 156 patients, 146 (94%) received red cell transfusions, of which 96 percent were indicated, 1 percent not indicated, and 3 percent controversial. Thirty-five patients (22%) received fresh-frozen plasma transfusions, of which 69 percent were indicated, 11 percent not indicated, 17 percent controversial, and 6 percent indeterminate. In the second part of the study, medical records were screened from 99 randomly selected patients who had received red cell transfusions (Group II), and the results were similar to those in Group I. Physician review was necessary in 20 percent of the transfused patients screened with the criteria maps. It is concluded that algorithms for transfusion review can be developed and used easily to fulfill regulatory and accreditation requirements and to plan focused educational programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2497566     DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1989.29489242793.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  6 in total

1.  Perioperative blood transfusion: a plea for guidelines.

Authors:  S Sudhindran
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Rational use of blood components - an audit.

Authors:  Minal Wade; Ratna Sharma; Mamta Manglani
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Transfusion practices among patients who did and did not predonate autologous blood before elective cardiac surgery.

Authors:  J Y Dupuis; B Bart; G Bryson; J Robblee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-04-06       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Evaluation of red blood cell transfusion practices with the use of preset criteria.

Authors:  W A Ghali; A Palepu; W G Paterson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Factors associated with transfusion requirements during treatment for acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  G Favre; M Fopp; J Gmür; A Tichelli; M F Fey; A Tobler; E Schatzmann; A Gratwohl
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.673

6.  Variation in red cell transfusion practice in the intensive care unit: a multicentre cohort study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.097

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.