Literature DB >> 24975001

Dentoskeletal effects of 3 maxillary expanders in patients with clefts: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Daniel Santos Fonseca Figueiredo1, Flávia Uchôa Costa Bartolomeo1, Camila Rodrigues Romualdo1, Juan Martin Palomo2, Martinho Campolina Rebello Horta3, Ildeu Andrade4, Dauro Douglas Oliveira5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dental changes in the maxillae of patients with clefts treated with 3 expanders: hyrax, fan-type, and inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first premolars.
METHODS: Thirty patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate with transverse maxillary deficiency were divided into 3 groups, according to the type of expander that they used. Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken before and 3 months after expansion, and the paired t test was used to evaluate the changes in each group.
RESULTS: The subjects in the inverted mini-hyrax group showed significant forward displacement of the maxilla (P <0.05). On the transversal plane, the hyrax group showed greater expansion in the posterior region than in the anterior region (P <0.05). However, the fan-type and the inverted mini-hyrax groups showed significantly greater maxillary expansion anteriorly than posteriorly (P <0.05). There was a greater tendency for buccal inclination of the supporting teeth when the fan-type was used. The cleft and the noncleft sides expanded symmetrically with all appliances, and there was no difference in dental tipping between these sides (P >0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The hyrax expander showed better results for cleft patients requiring anterior and posterior maxillary expansion. The inverted mini-hyrax most effectively restricted posterior expansion, optimizing anterior expansion without causing as much buccal tipping of the supporting teeth as did the fan-type.
Copyright © 2014 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24975001     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  10 in total

1.  Dental arch size and shape after maxillary expansion in bilateral complete cleft palate: A comparison of three expander designs.

Authors:  Fernando Pugliese; Juan Martin Palomo; Louise Resti Calil; Arthur de Medeiros Alves; José Roberto Pereira Lauris; Daniela Garib
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Cephalometric evaluation of rapid and slow maxillary expansion in patients with BCLP: Secondary data analysis from a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Leonardo Gregório; Arthur César de Medeiros Alves; Araci Malagodi de Almeida; Rodrigo Naveda; Guilherme Janson; Daniela Garib
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Three-dimensional nasal septum and maxillary changes following rapid maxillary expansion in patients with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Natália Costa Veloso; Carolina Morsani Mordente; Adriana Alckmim de Sousa; Juan Martin Palomo; Marilia Yatabe; Dauro Douglas Oliveira; Bernardo Quiroga Souki; Ildeu Andrade
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Analysis of the dentoalveolar effects of slow and rapid maxillary expansion in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Arthur César de Medeiros Alves; Daniela Gamba Garib; Guilherme Janson; Araci Malagodi de Almeida; Louise Resti Calil
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Slow versus rapid maxillary expansion in bilateral cleft lip and palate: a CBCT randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Araci Malagodi de Almeida; Terumi Okada Ozawa; Arthur César de Medeiros Alves; Guilherme Janson; José Roberto Pereira Lauris; Marilia Sayako Yatabe Ioshida; Daniela Gamba Garib
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  A prospective cohort study on the effects of RME in the mandibular dentition of cleft subjects.

Authors:  L Cardinal; D S F Figueiredo; F U C Bartolomeo; J M Palomo; I Andrade; D D Oliveira
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-10-11

7.  Plaque index and gingival index during rapid maxillary expansion of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Maria Olívia Rocha; Dauro Douglas Oliveira; Fernando Oliveira Costa; Laíze Rosa Pires; Amanda Rafaela Diniz; Rodrigo Villamarim Soares
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

8.  Cleft Orthodontic Care in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Inês Francisco; Gregory S Antonarakis; Francisco Caramelo; Maria Helena Fernandes; Francisco Vale
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-17

9.  Dentoskeletal outcomes of a rapid maxillary expander with differential opening in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate: A prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Daniela Garib; Rita De Cássia Moura Carvalho Lauris; Louise Resti Calil; Arthur César De Medeiros Alves; Guilherme Janson; Araci Malagodi De Almeida; Lúcia Helena Soares Cevidanes; José Roberto Pereira Lauris
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders.

Authors:  Daniel Santos Fonseca Figueiredo; Lucas Cardinal; Flávia Uchôa Costa Bartolomeo; Juan Martin Palomo; Martinho Campolina Rebello Horta; Ildeu Andrade; Dauro Douglas Oliveira
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.