Viola Kooij1, Vidya Venkatraman1,2, Jonathan A Kirk1, Ceereena Ubaida-Mohien3, David R Graham1,3, Matthijs J Faber4, Jennifer E Van Eyk1,2. 1. Department of medicine, Division of Cardiology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA. 2. Advanced Clinical Biosystems Research Institute, Heart Institute and Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA. 3. Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Erasmus MC-Sophia, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The identification of protein isoforms in complex biological samples is challenging. We, therefore, used an MS approach to unambiguously identify cardiac myofilament protein isoforms based on the observation of a tryptic peptide consisting of a sequence unique to a particular isoform. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Three different workflows were used to isolate and fractionate rat cardiac myofilament subproteomes. All fractions were analyzed on an LTQ-Orbitrap MS, proteins were identified using various search engines (MASCOT, X!Tandem, X!Tandem Kscore, and OMSSA) with results combined via PepArML Meta-Search engine, and a postsearch analysis was performed by MASPECTRAS. All MS data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000874 (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/dataset/PXD000874). RESULTS: The combination of multiple workflows and search engines resulted in a larger number of nonredundant proteins identified than with individual methods. A total of 102 myofilament annotated proteins were observed overlapping in two or three of the workflows. Literature search for myofilament presence with manual validation of the MS spectra was carried out for unambiguous identification: ten cardiac myofilament and 17 cardiac myofilament-associated proteins were identified with 39 isoforms and subisoforms. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We have identified multiple isoforms of myofilament proteins that are present in cardiac tissue using unique tryptic peptides. Changes in distribution of these protein isoforms under pathological conditions could ultimately allow for clinical diagnostics or as therapeutic targets.
PURPOSE: The identification of protein isoforms in complex biological samples is challenging. We, therefore, used an MS approach to unambiguously identify cardiac myofilament protein isoforms based on the observation of a tryptic peptide consisting of a sequence unique to a particular isoform. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Three different workflows were used to isolate and fractionate rat cardiac myofilament subproteomes. All fractions were analyzed on an LTQ-Orbitrap MS, proteins were identified using various search engines (MASCOT, X!Tandem, X!Tandem Kscore, and OMSSA) with results combined via PepArML Meta-Search engine, and a postsearch analysis was performed by MASPECTRAS. All MS data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000874 (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/dataset/PXD000874). RESULTS: The combination of multiple workflows and search engines resulted in a larger number of nonredundant proteins identified than with individual methods. A total of 102 myofilament annotated proteins were observed overlapping in two or three of the workflows. Literature search for myofilament presence with manual validation of the MS spectra was carried out for unambiguous identification: ten cardiac myofilament and 17 cardiac myofilament-associated proteins were identified with 39 isoforms and subisoforms. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We have identified multiple isoforms of myofilament proteins that are present in cardiac tissue using unique tryptic peptides. Changes in distribution of these protein isoforms under pathological conditions could ultimately allow for clinical diagnostics or as therapeutic targets.
Authors: Anja Linnemann; Padmanabhan Vakeel; Eduardo Bezerra; Zacharias Orfanos; Kristina Djinović-Carugo; Peter F M van der Ven; Gregor Kirfel; Dieter O Fürst Journal: J Muscle Res Cell Motil Date: 2012-12-09 Impact factor: 2.698
Authors: Juan Antonio Vizcaíno; Richard G Côté; Attila Csordas; José A Dianes; Antonio Fabregat; Joseph M Foster; Johannes Griss; Emanuele Alpi; Melih Birim; Javier Contell; Gavin O'Kelly; Andreas Schoenegger; David Ovelleiro; Yasset Pérez-Riverol; Florian Reisinger; Daniel Ríos; Rui Wang; Henning Hermjakob Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Padmesh S Rajput; Jessica Lamb; Shweta Kothari; Benedict Pereira; Daniel Soetkamp; Yizhou Wang; Jie Tang; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Eric S Mullins; Patrick D Lyden Journal: Glia Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 7.452
Authors: Daniel Soetkamp; Romain Gallet; Sarah J Parker; Ronald Holewinski; Vidya Venkatraman; Kiel Peck; Joshua I Goldhaber; Eduardo Marbán; Jennifer E Van Eyk Journal: Circ Res Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Marisa J Stachowski; Ronald J Holewinski; Eric Grote; Vidya Venkatraman; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Jonathan A Kirk Journal: Proteomics Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Joel D Federspiel; Panna Tandon; Caralynn M Wilczewski; Lauren Wasson; Laura E Herring; Samvida S Venkatesh; Ileana M Cristea; Frank L Conlon Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 8.029