Literature DB >> 2497481

Differential effects of cholinergic drugs on discriminative cues and self-stimulation produced by electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area.

J P Druhan1, H C Fibiger, A G Phillips.   

Abstract

Cholinergic receptors have been shown to modulate a subset of discriminative cues produced by electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) in rats. The present study identified the specific cholinergic receptor type modulating these electrical brain-stimulation (EBS) cues, and assessed whether these receptors also mediated the rewarding effects of VTA EBS. The EBS cues were enhanced by the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine and the muscarinic receptor agonists pilocarpine and RS-86, whereas the nicotinic receptor agonist nicotine had no effect. The enhancing effects of pilocarpine or RS-86 were attenuated by the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine. The EBS cues were not affected when scopolamine was injected alone, although high doses disrupted discriminated responses. Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) rates were depressed by physostigmine and pilocarpine and increased by nicotine and scopolamine. These results indicated a facilitatory influence of muscarinic receptors on the EBS cues, and an inhibitory role in VTA ICSS. Nicotinic receptor activation did not affect the EBS cues, but facilitated ICSS. These differential effects of cholinergic receptor activation point to a dissociation of the specific EBS cues measured in this study from the rewarding effects of VTA stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2497481     DOI: 10.1007/bf00439446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  24 in total

1.  Hypothalamic reward mechanism: two first-stage fiber populations with a cholinergic component.

Authors:  A Gratton; R A Wise
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Catecholamine theories of reward: a critical review.

Authors:  R A Wise
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-08-25       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Differential effects of physostigmine on cues produced by electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area using two discrimination procedures.

Authors:  J P Druhan; M T Martin-Iverson; D M Wilkie; H C Fibiger; A G Phillips
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Reward and detection thresholds for brain stimulation: dissociative effects of cocaine.

Authors:  C Kornetsky; R U Esposito
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-03-30       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  The curve-shift paradigm in self-stimulation.

Authors:  E Miliaressis; P P Rompre; P Laviolette; L Philippe; D Coulombe
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1986

6.  The pharmacological assessment of RS 86 (2-ethyl-8-methyl-2,8-diazaspiro-[4,5]-decan-1,3-dion hydrobromide). A potent, specific muscarinic acetylcholine receptor agonist.

Authors:  J M Palacios; G Bolliger; A Closse; A Enz; G Gmelin; J Malanowski
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1986-06-05       Impact factor: 4.432

7.  Increased in vivo tyrosine hydroxylase activity in rat telencephalon produced by self-stimulation of the ventral tegmental area.

Authors:  A G Phillips; A Jakubovic; H C Fibiger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1987-01-27       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Antagonism of oxotremorine-induced behavioral suppression by antimuscarinic drugs.

Authors:  J D Leander
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  The discriminative stimulus properties and detection thresholds of intracranial self-stimulation: effects of d-amphetamine, morphine, and haloperidol.

Authors:  G J Schaefer; R P Michael
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Task-specific effects of nicotine in rats. Intracranial self-stimulation and locomotor activity.

Authors:  G J Schaefer; R P Michael
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.250

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Intracranial self-stimulation to evaluate abuse potential of drugs.

Authors:  S Stevens Negus; Laurence L Miller
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  The effects of reinforcer magnitude on timing in rats.

Authors:  Elliot A Ludvig; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Cholinergic regulation of mood: from basic and clinical studies to emerging therapeutics.

Authors:  Stephanie C Dulawa; David S Janowsky
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 15.992

4.  On the Similarity Between the Reinforcing and the Discriminative Properties of Intracranial Self-Stimulation.

Authors:  David N Velazquez-Martinez; Benita Lizeth Pacheco-Gomez; Ana Laura Toscano-Zapien; Maria Almudena Lopez-Guzman; Daniel Velazquez-Lopez
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.558

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.