Literature DB >> 24973904

The effect of immediate postpartum compared to delayed postpartum and interval etonogestrel contraceptive implant insertion on removal rates for bleeding.

Luu Doan Ireland1, Vinita Goyal2, Christina A Raker2, Anne Murray2, Rebecca H Allen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the discontinuation rate of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant due to irregular vaginal bleeding among women with immediate postpartum insertion is increased compared to delayed postpartum and interval placement. STUDY
DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study compared women who underwent immediate postpartum etonogestrel contraceptive implant insertion (within 96 h of delivery) to delayed postpartum (6 to 12 weeks postpartum) and interval insertion between January 2008 and December 2010. Charts were reviewed for date and reason for removal. A chi-squared test was used to compare discontinuation due to bleeding between cohorts. Baseline characteristics predictive of implant removal were evaluated by simple logistic regression.
RESULTS: There were 259 women in the immediate postpartum group, 49 in the delayed postpartum group and 106 in the interval group. Average age at insertion was 22.6 (±5.5) years. Overall, 19.3% of women in the immediate postpartum group requested removal due to irregular bleeding compared to 18.4% in the delayed postpartum group [odds ratio (OR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-2.33] and 20.8% in the interval group (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.52-1.60). There was no difference between groups in premature removal rates for any side effect. There were no sociodemographic or clinical characteristics predictive of removal in any group.
CONCLUSION: One-fifth of etonogestrel contraceptive implant users requested premature removal due to irregular bleeding. Immediate postpartum implant insertion does not lead to increased removal rates and may help reduce unintended pregnancy. Mechanisms to help women manage irregular bleeding due to the implant are needed. IMPLICATIONS: Immediate postpartum insertion of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant does not lead to increased removal rates due to vaginal bleeding compared to delayed postpartum or interval insertion. Immediate postpartum implant insertion may increase uptake of long-acting reversible contraception and help reduce short interpregnancy intervals and unintended pregnancy.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Etonogestrel; Implanon; Implant; Nexplanon; Postpartum contraception

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24973904     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  7 in total

1.  Immediate versus delayed postpartum use of levonorgestrel contraceptive implants: a randomized controlled trial in Uganda.

Authors:  Sarah Averbach; Othman Kakaire; Herbert Kayiga; Felicia Lester; Abby Sokoloff; Josaphat Byamugisha; Christine Dehlendorf; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Beyond the Surface: Care Seeking Among Patients Initiating Contraceptive Implant in an Urban Federally Qualified Health Center Network.

Authors:  Anita Ravi; Linda Prine; Gabrielle deFiebre; Susan E Rubin
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-09-19

Review 3.  Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant for contraception.

Authors:  Jen Sothornwit; Yuthapong Werawatakul; Srinaree Kaewrudee; Pisake Lumbiganon; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-22

4.  Determinants of early discontinuation of etonogestrel sub-dermal implant among reproductive-age women in Legambo district, Northeast Ethiopia: An unmatched case-control study.

Authors:  Yesuf Yimer; Niguss Cherie; Yitaysh Damtie
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-03-29

Review 5.  Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Morena Luigia Rocca; Anna Rita Palumbo; Federica Visconti; Costantino Di Carlo
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-08

Review 6.  Innate Immunity and Biomaterials at the Nexus: Friends or Foes.

Authors:  Susan N Christo; Kerrilyn R Diener; Akash Bachhuka; Krasimir Vasilev; John D Hayball
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Prenatal contraceptive counseling and method provision after childbirth.

Authors:  Anita L Nelson
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2015-05-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.