Literature DB >> 24972736

Cross-sectional area of the abdomen predicts complication incidence in patients undergoing sternal reconstruction.

Jeffrey H Kozlow1, Jeffrey Lisiecki1, Michael N Terjimanian2, Jacob Rinkinen1, Robert Cameron Brownley1, Shailesh Agarwal1, Stewart C Wang3, Benjamin Levi4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sternal reconstruction with vascularized flaps is central to the management of sternal wound infections and mediastinitis but carries a high risk of complications. There is a need to identify reliable predictors of complication risk to help inform patients and clinicians in preparation for surgery. Unfortunately, body mass index and serum albumin may not be reliable predictors of complication rates. Analytic morphomics provides a robust quantitative method to measure patients' obesity as it pertains to their risk of complications in undergoing sternal reconstruction.
METHODS: We identified 34 patients with preoperative computed tomography scans of the abdomen from a cohort of sternal reconstructions performed between 1997 and 2010. Using semiautomated analytic morphomics, we identified the patients' skin and fascia layers between the ninth and 12th thoracic spine levels; from these landmarks, we calculated morphomic measurements of the patients' abdomens, including their total body cross sectional area and the cross sectional area of their subcutaneous fat. We obtained the incidence of complications from chart review and correlated the incidence of complications (including seroma, hematoma, recurrent wounds, mediastinitis, tracheostomy, and death) with patients' morphomic measurements.
RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of patients (n = 21) suffered complications after their operation. Those who suffered from complications, relative to those who did not have complications, had increased visceral fat area (12,547.2 mm(2)versus 6569.9 mm(2), P = 0.0080), subcutaneous fat area (16,520.2 mm(2)versus 8020.1 mm(2), P = 0.0036), total body area (91,028.6 mm(2)versus 67,506.5 mm(2), P = 0.0022), fascia area (69,238.4 mm(2)versus 56,730.9 mm(2), P = 0.0118), total body circumference (1101.8 mm versus 950.2 mm, P = 0.0017), and fascia circumference (967.5 mm versus 868.1 mm, P = 0.0077). We also demonstrated a significant positive correlation between the previously mentioned morphomic measurements and the incidence of complications in multivariate logistic regression models, with odds ratios ranging from 1.19-3.10 (P values ranging from 0.010-0.022).
CONCLUSIONS: Increases in abdominal morphomic measurements correlate strongly with the incidence of complications in patients undergoing sternal reconstruction. This finding may influence preoperative risk stratification and surgical decision making in this patient population.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Morphomics; Sternal reconstruction; Subcutaneous fat

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24972736      PMCID: PMC4631610          DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  29 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts in the management and reconstruction of the dehisced median sternotomy.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Graeber; William T McClelland
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004

2.  Introduction to chest wall reconstruction: anatomy and physiology of the chest and indications for chest wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark W Clemens; Karen K Evans; Samir Mardini; Phillip G Arnold
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Definitive closure of the infected median sternotomy wound: a treatment algorithm utilizing vacuum-assisted closure followed by rigid plate fixation.

Authors:  Sara R Dickie; Amir H Dorafshar; David H Song
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Osteosynthetic thoracic stabilization after complete resection of the sternum.

Authors:  Bernhard Voss; Robert Bauernschmitt; Gernot Brockmann; Rüdiger Lange
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Prevention of sternal dehiscence and infection in high-risk patients: a prospective randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Christoph Schimmer; Wilko Reents; Silvia Berneder; Peter Eigel; Oemer Sezer; Hans Scheld; Kerim Sahraoui; Brigitte Gansera; Oliver Deppert; Alvaro Rubio; Richard Feyrer; Cathrin Sauer; Olaf Elert; Rainer Leyh
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Pectoral muscle flap with V-Y skin paddle for covering sternal defects.

Authors:  Martin Molitor; Martin Simek; Vladimír Lonský; Martin Kaláb; Jiří Veselý; Bohumil Zálešák
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Significant predictors of complications after sternal wound reconstruction: a 21-year experience.

Authors:  Hamid R Zahiri; Kimberly Lumpkins; Shahrooz S Kelishadi; Yue Zhu; Daniel Medina; Alexandra Condé-Green; Ronald P Silverman; Sheri Slezak; Nelson H Goldberg; Luther H Holton; Devinder P Singh
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Surgical site infection and analytic morphometric assessment of body composition in patients undergoing midline laparotomy.

Authors:  Jay S Lee; Michael N Terjimanian; Lindsay M Tishberg; Abbas Z Alawieh; Calista M Harbaugh; Kyle H Sheetz; Sven A Holcombe; Stewart C Wang; Christopher J Sonnenday; Michael J Englesbe
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Sternotomy wounds: rectus flap versus modified pectoral reconstruction.

Authors:  Steven P Davison; Mark W Clemens; Deana Armstrong; Ernest D Newton; William Swartz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Immediate versus delayed one-stage sternal débridement and pectoralis muscle flap reconstruction of deep sternal wound infections.

Authors:  Edmond B Cabbabe; Samer W Cabbabe
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bariatric Surgery and Time to Total Joint Arthroplasty: Does It Affect Readmission and Complication Rates?

Authors:  Ran Schwarzkopf; Jessica A Lavery; Jessica Hooper; Manish Parikh; Heather T Gold
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  The Association Between Metabolic Derangement and Wound Complications in Elective Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Amanda R Sergesketter; Yisong Geng; Ronnie L Shammas; Gerald V Denis; Robin Bachelder; Scott T Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.417

3.  Does peritrochanteric fat thickness increase the risk of early reoperation for infection or wound complications following total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Joshua A Bell; Andrew Jeong; Daniel D Bohl; Brett Levine; Craig Della Valle; Denis Nam
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-04-08

4.  Thickness of the Subcutaneous Fat as a Risk Factor for Surgical Site Infection Following Fragility Hip Fracture Surgery.

Authors:  Tal Frenkel Rutenberg; Rotem Markman; Ran Rutenberg; Efrat Daglan; Tomer Rubin; Shai Shemesh
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-23

5.  Soft-tissue thickness radiographic measurement: a marker to evaluate acute periprosthetic joint infection risk in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Laura Rey Fernández; Francesc Angles Crespo; Silvia María Miguela Álvarez; Martí Carles Bernaus-Johnson; Agustí Bartra Ylla; Lluís Font-Vizcarra
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2021-06-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.