BACKGROUND: It is conceivable that overstimulation of chemo- and mechano-sensors in the Roux and common limbs by uncontrolled influx of undigested nutrients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) could lead to exaggerated satiety signaling via vagal afferents and contribute to body weight loss. Because previous clinical and preclinical studies using vagotomy came to different conclusions, the aim was to examine the effects of selective and histologically verified celiac branch vagotomy on reduced food intake and body weight loss induced by RYGB. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent either RYGB + celiac branch vagotomy (RYGB/VgX, n=15), RYGB + sham celiac branch vagotomy (RYGB/Sham VgX; n=6), Sham RYGB + celiac branch vagotomy (Sham/VgX; n=6), or sham RYGB + sham celiac branch vagotomy (Sham/Sham; n=6), and body weight, body composition, and food choice were monitored for 3 months after intervention. RESULTS: In rats with RYGB, histologically confirmed celiac branch vagotomy significantly moderated weight loss during the first 40 days after surgery, compared to either sham or failed vagotomy (P<0.05). In contrast, celiac branch vagotomy slightly, but non-significantly, reduced body weight gain in sham RYGB rats compared to sham/sham rats. Furthermore, the significant food intake suppression during the first 32 days after RYGB (P<0.05) was also moderated in rats with verified celiac branch vagotomy. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that signals carried by vagal afferents from the mid and lower intestines contribute to the early RYGB-induced body weight loss and reduction of food intake.
BACKGROUND: It is conceivable that overstimulation of chemo- and mechano-sensors in the Roux and common limbs by uncontrolled influx of undigested nutrients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) could lead to exaggerated satiety signaling via vagal afferents and contribute to body weight loss. Because previous clinical and preclinical studies using vagotomy came to different conclusions, the aim was to examine the effects of selective and histologically verified celiac branch vagotomy on reduced food intake and body weight loss induced by RYGB. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent either RYGB + celiac branch vagotomy (RYGB/VgX, n=15), RYGB + sham celiac branch vagotomy (RYGB/Sham VgX; n=6), Sham RYGB + celiac branch vagotomy (Sham/VgX; n=6), or sham RYGB + sham celiac branch vagotomy (Sham/Sham; n=6), and body weight, body composition, and food choice were monitored for 3 months after intervention. RESULTS: In rats with RYGB, histologically confirmed celiac branch vagotomy significantly moderated weight loss during the first 40 days after surgery, compared to either sham or failed vagotomy (P<0.05). In contrast, celiac branch vagotomy slightly, but non-significantly, reduced body weight gain in sham RYGB rats compared to sham/sham rats. Furthermore, the significant food intake suppression during the first 32 days after RYGB (P<0.05) was also moderated in rats with verified celiac branch vagotomy. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that signals carried by vagal afferents from the mid and lower intestines contribute to the early RYGB-induced body weight loss and reduction of food intake.
Authors: M W Furnes; B Stenstrom; K Tømmerås; T Skoglund; S L Dickson; B Kulseng; C-M Zhao; D Chen Journal: Eur Surg Res Date: 2008-02-05 Impact factor: 1.745
Authors: A Perathoner; H Weiss; W Santner; G Brandacher; E Laimer; E Höller; F Aigner; A Klaus Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2008-08-15 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: A Miranda; A Mickle; B Medda; Z Zhang; R J Phillips; N Tipnis; T L Powley; R Shaker; J N Sengupta Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Huiyuan Zheng; Andrew C Shin; Natalie R Lenard; R Leigh Townsend; Laurel M Patterson; David L Sigalet; Hans-Rudolf Berthoud Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Marco Bueter; Christian Löwenstein; Hutan Ashrafian; Jacquelien Hillebrand; Stephen R Bloom; Torsten Olbers; Thomas Lutz; Carel W le Roux Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2010-01-30 Impact factor: 4.129