| Literature DB >> 24971909 |
James A Browne1, Ann Harris2, Shih-Hsing Leir1.
Abstract
A critical part of generating robust chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) data is the optimization of chromatin purification and size selection. This is particularly important when ChIP is combined with next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq) to identify targets of DNA-binding proteins, genome-wide. Current protocols refined by the ENCODE consortium generally use a two-step cell lysis procedure that is applicable to a wide variety of cell types. However, the isolation and size selection of chromatin from primary human epithelial cells may often be particularly challenging. These cells tend to form sheets of formaldehyde cross-linked material in which cells are resistant to membrane lysis, nuclei are not released and subsequent sonication produces extensive high molecular weight contamination. Here we describe an optimized protocol to prepare high quality ChIP-grade chromatin from primary human bronchial epithelial cells. The ENCODE protocol was used as a starting point to which we added the following key steps to separate the sheets of formaldehyde-fixed cells prior to lysis. (1) Incubation of the formaldehyde-fixed adherent cells in Trypsin-EDTA (0.25% room temperature) for no longer than 5 min. (2) Equilibration of the fixed cells in detergent-free lysis buffers prior to each lysis step. (3) The addition of 0.5% Triton X-100 to the complete cell membrane lysis buffer. (4) Passing the cell suspension (in complete cell membrane lysis buffer) through a 25-gauge needle followed by continuous agitation on ice for 35 min. Each step of the modified protocol was documented by light microscopy using the Methyl Green-Pyronin dual dye, which stains cytoplasm red (Pyronin) and the nuclei grey-blue (Methyl green). This modified method is reproducibly effective at producing high quality sheared chromatin for ChIP and is equally applicable to other epithelial cell types.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24971909 PMCID: PMC4074041 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
A comparison of modified (protocol 1) and unmodified (protocol 2) Myers Lab Protocol [5]) for the isolation of primary epithelial cell chromatin for ChIP.
| Protocol 1 (Modified Protocol) | Protocol 2 (Original Myers Protocol | |||
| Primary Airway | Primary Urogenital | Multiple cell types | ||
|
| 1.0×107 | 1.5×107 | 2.0×107 | |
|
|
| ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
|
| ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | |
|
| ✓+0.5% Triton X-100 | ✓+0.5% Triton X-100 | ✓ | |
|
| ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | |
|
| ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | |
|
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
|
|
| 35–40 | 35–40 | Not specified |
|
| 16–18 | 16–18 | Not specified | |
Steps included (✓) or omitted (✗).
Figure 1Light microscopy of Methyl Green-Pyronin stained primary human airway epithelial (HBE) cells during the modified (A, Protocol 1) and unmodified (B, Protocol 2) and resulting sonicated chromatin (C, D), separated on 2% agarose gels post-stained with 0.01% ethidium bromide.
Note, the sheets of cells have not lysed during protocol 2 and the resulting sheared DNA is of poor quality for ChIP. Methods as described in the text. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 2Light microscopy of the Methyl Green-Pyronin stained human airway epithelial cell line, Calu-3 during the modified (A, Protocol 1) and unmodified (B, Protocol 2) and resulting sonicated chromatin (C, D), separated on 2% agarose gels post-stained with 0.01% ethidium bromide.
Note, the sheets of cells have not lysed during protocol 2 and the resulting sheared DNA is of poor quality for ChIP. Methods as described in the text. Scale bar = 50 µm for A (Protocol 1) and 100 µm for B (Protocol 2).