Jennifer Daubenmier1, Dara Hayden2, Vickie Chang3, Elissa Epel4. 1. Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States. Electronic address: Jennifer.Daubenmier@ucsf.edu. 2. The Wright Institute, Berkeley, California, United States. Electronic address: drdarahayden@gmail.com. 3. Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The cortisol awakening response (CAR) is a natural metabolic response that can be potentiated by negative cognitive-emotional processes, including stress appraisals, negative affect, and rumination. Psychological distress and the CAR are not consistently related, however. Individual differences in aspects of dispositional mindfulness which reflect how people relate to negative thoughts and emotions may help explain such inconsistencies. We tested whether the tendency to (1) label and describe inner experiences and (2) accept negative thoughts and feelings without judgment moderated the association between psychological distress and the CAR. METHODS:Self-reported dispositional mindfulness, perceived stress, anxiety, negative affect, rumination, and the CAR were assessed among overweight/obese women. Regression analyses were conducted to examine whether dispositional mindfulness moderated the relationship between indicators of psychological distress and the CAR. RESULTS: While psychological distress was consistently positively related to the CAR, these associations were qualified by significant interactions with both components of dispositional mindfulness. Psychological distress was associated with the CAR at lower levels of dispositional mindfulness but not at higher levels. CONCLUSION: These findings are consistent with the idea that the tendency to describe and accept experiences may buffer the impact of psychological distress on physiological arousal. These metacognitive processes may be important moderators in unraveling the complex relationship between psychological distress and physiological stress reactivity. Further research is recommended to replicate this approach in other populations.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The cortisol awakening response (CAR) is a natural metabolic response that can be potentiated by negative cognitive-emotional processes, including stress appraisals, negative affect, and rumination. Psychological distress and the CAR are not consistently related, however. Individual differences in aspects of dispositional mindfulness which reflect how people relate to negative thoughts and emotions may help explain such inconsistencies. We tested whether the tendency to (1) label and describe inner experiences and (2) accept negative thoughts and feelings without judgment moderated the association between psychological distress and the CAR. METHODS: Self-reported dispositional mindfulness, perceived stress, anxiety, negative affect, rumination, and the CAR were assessed among overweight/obesewomen. Regression analyses were conducted to examine whether dispositional mindfulness moderated the relationship between indicators of psychological distress and the CAR. RESULTS: While psychological distress was consistently positively related to the CAR, these associations were qualified by significant interactions with both components of dispositional mindfulness. Psychological distress was associated with the CAR at lower levels of dispositional mindfulness but not at higher levels. CONCLUSION: These findings are consistent with the idea that the tendency to describe and accept experiences may buffer the impact of psychological distress on physiological arousal. These metacognitive processes may be important moderators in unraveling the complex relationship between psychological distress and physiological stress reactivity. Further research is recommended to replicate this approach in other populations.
Authors: Yuri Miyamoto; Jennifer Morozink Boylan; Christopher L Coe; Katherine B Curhan; Cynthia S Levine; Hazel Rose Markus; Jiyoung Park; Shinobu Kitayama; Norito Kawakami; Mayumi Karasawa; Gayle D Love; Carol D Ryff Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2013-07-31 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Jennifer Daubenmier; Jean Kristeller; Frederick M Hecht; Nicole Maninger; Margaret Kuwata; Kinnari Jhaveri; Robert H Lustig; Margaret Kemeny; Lori Karan; Elissa Epel Journal: J Obes Date: 2011-10-02
Authors: Ian A Boggero; Camelia E Hostinar; Eric A Haak; Michael L M Murphy; Suzanne C Segerstrom Journal: Biol Psychol Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 3.251
Authors: Julianne C Flanagan; Nathaniel L Baker; Aimee L McRae-Clark; Kathleen T Brady; Margaret M Moran-Santa Maria Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2015-07-23 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Fadel Zeidan; Tim Salomons; Suzan R Farris; Nichole M Emerson; Adrienne Adler-Neal; Youngkyoo Jung; Robert C Coghill Journal: Pain Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Amanda Skoranski; Nichole R Kelly; Rachel M Radin; Katherine A Thompson; Ovidiu Galescu; Andrew P Demidowich; Sheila M Brady; Kong Y Chen; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff; Jack A Yanovski; Lauren B Shomaker Journal: J Child Fam Stud Date: 2018-03-19
Authors: Stephanie L Dalager; Shelly Annameier; Stephanie M Bruggink; Bernadette Pivarunas; J Douglas Coatsworth; Arlene A Schmid; Christopher Bell; Patricia Broderick; Kirk Warren Brown; Jordan Quaglia; Lauren B Shomaker Journal: Adv Mind Body Med Date: 2018 Fall
Authors: Jennifer Daubenmier; Elissa S Epel; Patricia J Moran; Jason Thompson; Ashley E Mason; Michael Acree; Veronica Goldman; Jean Kristeller; Frederick M Hecht; Wendy B Mendes Journal: Mindfulness (N Y) Date: 2019-09-10