Literature DB >> 24971489

Extended regimens of combined hormonal contraception to reduce symptoms related to withdrawal bleeding and the hormone-free interval: a systematic review of randomised and observational studies.

Nicolás Mendoza1, Paloma Lobo, Roberto Lertxundi, Marta Correa, Esteban Gonzalez, Alberto Salamanca, Rafael Sánchez-Borrego.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether continuous and extended regimens (CRs/ERs) of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) improve symptoms related to withdrawal bleeding or the hormone-free interval and to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost of CRs/ERs to those of conventional 28-day regimens. STUDY
DESIGN: A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies published in any language between 2006 and 2013.
RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs and 14 observational studies evaluated issues related to our objectives. CRs/ERs, whose efficacy and safety were comparable to those described for conventional regimens, were preferred due to their improvement of symptoms related to withdrawal bleeding or the hormone-free interval and the lower costs resulting from the reduced incidence of these symptoms.
CONCLUSION: The contraceptive efficacy and safety of CR/ER use of CHCs is at least equal to that of 28-days conventional regimens, and this use may have some cost savings. CRs/ERs are recommended for women willing to take a CHC for treatment of symptoms related to withdrawal bleeding or the hormone-free interval.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Combined hormonal contraceptives; Continuous regimen; Contraception; Extended regimen; Hormone-free interval; Withdrawal bleeding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24971489     DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2014.927423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1362-5187            Impact factor:   1.848


  3 in total

1.  Cycle control with an extended-regimen oral contraceptive combining levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol that includes continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol instead of the traditional hormone-free interval.

Authors:  Rossella E Nappi; Paloma Lobo Abascal; Jennifer Hsieh; Marie-Christine Micheletti
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-10-05

Review 2.  Extended regimen combined oral contraception: A review of evolving concepts and acceptance by women and clinicians.

Authors:  Rossella E Nappi; Andrew M Kaunitz; Johannes Bitzer
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Real-world experience of women using extended-cycle vs monthly-cycle combined oral contraception in the United States: the National Health and Wellness Survey.

Authors:  Rossella E Nappi; Iñaki Lete; Lulu K Lee; Natalia M Flores; Marie-Christine Micheletti; Boxiong Tang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.809

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.