| Literature DB >> 24971149 |
Sriranjini Sitaram Jaideep1, Dindagur Nagaraja2, Pramod Kumar Pal2, D Sudhakara3, Sathyaprabha N Talakad4.
Abstract
Objectives. Cardiac autonomic dysfunction in stroke has implications on morbidity and mortality. Ayurveda (Indian system of medicine) describes stroke as pakshaghata. We intended to study the effect of Ayurveda therapies on the cardiac autonomic dysfunction. Methods. Fifty patients of ischemic stroke (middle cerebral artery territory) (mean age 39.26 ± 9.88 years; male 43, female 7) were recruited within one month of ictus. All patients received standard allopathic medications as advised by neurologist. In addition, patients were randomized to receive physiotherapy (Group I) or Ayurveda treatment (Group II) for 14 days. Continuous electrocardiogram and finger arterial pressure were recorded for 15 min before and after treatments and analyzed offline to obtain heart rate and blood pressure variability and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). Results were analysed by RMANOVA. Results. Patients in Group II showed statistically significant improvement in cardiac autonomic parameters. The standard deviation of normal to normal intervals,and total and low frequency powers were significantly enhanced (F = 8.16, P = 0.007, F = 9.73, P = 0.004, F = 13.51, and P = 0.001, resp.). The BRS too increased following the treatment period (F = 10.129, P = 0.004). Conclusions. The current study is the first to report a positive modulation of cardiac autonomic activity after adjuvant Ayurveda treatment in ischemic stroke. Further long term studies are warranted.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24971149 PMCID: PMC4058279 DOI: 10.1155/2014/634695
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Medicines used.
| Ingredients | |
|---|---|
| Sanskrit name | Latin name |
| (1) | |
| Bala |
|
| Sahachara |
|
| Eranda |
|
| Shunti |
|
| Rasna |
|
| Suradruma |
|
| Sinduvara |
|
| Lasuna |
|
|
| |
| (2) | |
| Balamoola |
|
| Tila taila | Gingelly oil |
| Goksheera | Milk |
| Balamoola kalka |
|
|
| |
| (3) | |
| Ashwagandha |
|
| Bala |
|
| Tila taila | Gingelly oil |
| Lodhra |
|
| Sarjikakshara | |
| Bidara |
|
| Haridra |
|
| Daruharidra |
|
| Renuka seeds |
|
| Kushta |
|
| Musta |
|
| Srigandha |
|
| Sariva |
|
| Katukarohini |
|
| Shatahva |
|
| Devadaru |
|
| Manjistha |
|
| Yashti |
|
| Usheera |
|
| Ksheera | Milk |
|
| |
| (4) | |
| Masha |
|
| Bilva |
|
| Agnimantha |
|
| Shyonaka |
|
| Kashmiri |
|
| Patala |
|
| Brihati |
|
| Kantakari |
|
| Gokshura |
|
| Salaprni |
|
| Prishnaparni |
|
| Jala | Water |
| Tila taila | Gingelly oil |
| Ksheera | Milk |
| Ashwagandha |
|
| Vidari |
|
| Shatavari |
|
| Kachora |
|
| Devadaru |
|
| Bala |
|
| Rasna |
|
| Prasarini |
|
| Kushta |
|
| Shatahva |
|
| Parushaka |
|
| Bharangi |
|
| Punarnava |
|
| Pippali Mula |
|
| Chitrak |
|
| Jivanti |
|
| Sariva |
|
| Mashaparni |
|
| Mudgaparni |
|
| Guduchi |
|
| Yashti |
|
| Saindhava lavana | Rock salt |
| Hingu |
|
Demographic details of the patients.
| Variable | Group I ( | Group II ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (in years) | 40.12 ± 9.31 | 38.40 ± 10.50 | 0.543 |
| Gender (M : F) | 20 : 5 | 23 : 2 | 0.111 |
| Height (cm) | 168.08 ± 2.04 | 170.84 ± 1.43 | 0.274 |
| Weight (kg) | 66.72 ± 2.38 | 67.01 ± 2.51 | 0.936 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.04 ± 0.78 | 23.33 ± 0.76 | 0.519 |
| Duration of illness (days) | 14.96 ± 4.16 | 17.20 ± 5.74 | 0.121 |
| Smoking | 14 | 17 | 0.718 |
| Alcohol | 15 | 17 | 0.860 |
| Hypertension | 2 | 3 | 1.000 |
| Diabetics | 2 | 2 | 1.000 |
| Right side infarct | 10 | 8 | — |
| Left side infarct | 15 | 17 | — |
M: male; F: female; BMI: body mass index; values expressed as mean ± SD.
Comparison of heart rate variability (HRV) measures between healthy controls and ischemic stroke patients.
| HRV variables | Controls ( | Patients ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| NN interval (ms) | 869.96 ± 23.15 | 795.67 ± 16.22 | 0.009** |
| HR (bpm) | 70.44 ± 1.88 | 76.08 ± 1.61 | 0.026* |
| SDNN (ms) | 48.01 ± 3.42 | 36.47 ± 2.25 | 0.004** |
| RMSSD (ms) | 38.06 ± 4.13 | 28.00 ± 2.80 | 0.027* |
| TP (ms2) | 2489.00 ± 337.06 | 1286.63 ± 148.50 | 0.000*** |
| LF (ms2) | 527.16 ± 62.53 | 290.11 ± 34.87 | 0.001** |
| LFnu | 44.92 ± 2.71 | 49.01 ± 3.13 | 0.481 |
| HF (ms2) | 812.62 ± 196.77 | 364.71 ± 90.81 | 0.005** |
| HFnu | 49.18 ± 2.61 | 41.87 ± 3.30 | 0.042* |
| Sympathovagal balance | 1.09 ± 0.13 | 1.66 ± 0.20 | 0.043* |
NN: R-R interval (ms); HR: heart rate (bpm: beats per minute); SDNN: standard deviation of NN intervals (ms); RMSSD: square root of the mean of the sum of squares of differences between adjacent NN intervals (ms); TP: total power (ms2); LF: low frequency power (ms2); HF: high frequency power (ms2); nu: normalized units; SVB: sympathovagal balance; values expressed as mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 1Effect of intervention on heart rate variability measures and baroreflex sensitivity (a) NN—R-R interval (ms); (b) HR—heart rate (bpm—beats per minute); (c) SDNN—standard deviation of NN intervals (ms); (d) RMSSD—square root of the mean of the sum of squares of differences between adjacent NN intervals (ms); (e) TP—total power (ms2); (f) LF—low frequency power (ms2); (g) BRS—baroreflex sensitivity (ms/mm Hg); values expressed as Mean±SEM; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, pre versus post, within group comparison; † P < 0.05 Group I versus Group II at 2 weeks.