| Literature DB >> 24971143 |
Jiangang Liu1, Karoline Peter2, Dazhuo Shi1, Lei Zhang1, Guoju Dong1, Dawu Zhang1, Heimo Breiteneder2, Johannes Jakowitsch3, Yan Ma2.
Abstract
SINI TANG (SNT) IS A TRADITIONAL CHINESE HERBAL FORMULA CONSISTING OF FOUR DIFFERENT HERBS: the root of Aconitum carmichaelii, the bark of Cinnamomum cassia, the rhizome of Zingiber officinale, and the root of Glycyrrhiza uralensis. This study aims to evaluate the improvement of early ventricular remodeling and cardiac function in myocardial infarction (MI) rats by SNT. A MI model was established by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Following treatment for 4 weeks, ultrasonic echocardiography was performed. Myocardial histopathological changes were observed using haematoxylin and eosin staining. Collagens (type I and type III), transforming growth factor- β 1 (TGF- β 1), and Toll-like receptors (TLR-2 and TLR-4) were measured in plasma, serum, and myocardial tissue. SNT treatment decreased the infarct size, the left ventricular cavity area/heart cavity area ratio, and the left ventricle dimension at end systole and increased the left ventricular ejection fraction. SNT reduced the levels of TLR-2 and TLR-4 in myocardial tissue significantly and decreased the collagens content in serum and in myocardial tissue. SNT could partially reduce the level of TGF- β 1 in serum and in myocardial tissue. Our data suggest that the Chinese medicine formula SNT has the potential to improve early ventricular remodeling and cardiac function after MI.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24971143 PMCID: PMC4058176 DOI: 10.1155/2014/141938
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
The five experimental groups. Drugs diluted with distilled water were administered orally once a day for 30 days starting two days after induction of AMI.
| Group |
| Operation | Oral administration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 10 | Sham | Drinking water |
| Model | 10 | AMI | Drinking water |
| FS | 10 | AMI | Fosinopril sodium (0.9 mg/kg) |
| SNT-LD | 10 | AMI | Low dose of SNT (4.5 g/kg) |
| SNT-HD | 10 | AMI | High dose of SNT (13.5 g/kg) |
Echocardiographic parameters—overview of ventricular remodeling effects.
| Sham | Model | FS | SNT-LD | SNT-HD | Remodeling effects | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVDd (mm) | 3.29 ± 0.81 | 6.24 ± 0.72 | 4.45 ± 1.28** | 5.37 ± 1.78 | 4.87 ± 1.47 | ↓ |
| LVDs (mm) | 0.91 ± 0.20 | 6.44 ± 1.59** | 3.81 ± 1.21∗∗▲▲ | 4.95 ± 1.95** | 3.74 ± 1.47∗∗▲▲ | ↓ |
| EF (%) | 93.32 ± 2.94 | 55.48 ± 12.89** | 78.03 ± 10.70∗▲▲ | 69.69 ± 13.91∗▲ | 77.83 ± 12.32∗∗▲▲ | ↑ |
| IS (mm2) | 38.04 ± 8.35 | 23.91 ± 7.99▲▲ | 31.25 ± 10.68 | 27.81 ± 4.91▲ | ↓ | |
| HW/BW (mg/g) | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.37 ± 0.07 | 0.36 ± 0.08 | 0.35 ± 0.08 | 0.36 ± 0.07 | ↓ |
| LVAC/HCA (%) | 10.82 ± 3.01 | 22.30 ± 3.92** | 15.17 ± 6.54▲▲ | 18.48 ± 3.96* | 15.25 ± 2.78▲ | ↓ |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus sham group; ▲ P < 0.05, ▲▲ P < 0.01 versus model group.
Figure 1Histological and echocardiographic images. (a–e) Haematoxylin and eosin staining of midventricular cross-sections. (f–j) Two-dimensional-guided M-mode echocardiographic images of the left ventricle.
Figure 2Echocardiographic parameters. (a) Infarct size results, (b) echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular dimension at end diastole (LVDd), (c) left ventricular dimension at end systole (LVDs), (d) left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), and (e) left ventricular cavity area/heart cavity area ratios (LVAC/HCA).
Figure 3Immunohistochemical analysis of Toll-like receptors in myocardial tissue. TLR-2 (a–e) and TLR-4 (f–j) expression in early VR rats was observed in each experiment group after AMI using a 400x optical microscopy. Expression of TLRs is much stronger in the tissue of the model group in comparison to the sham group as shown by darker and lager granules (arrowheads in (b) and (g)). The FS and both SNT treatment groups showed reduced expression of TLR-2 and TLR-4 compared to the model group (arrows in (c), (d), (e), (h), (i), and (j)).
Overview of TLR expression levels in myocardial tissue.
| Sham | Model | FS | SNT-LD | SNT-HD | Expression levels | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In myocardial tissue | ||||||
| TLR-2 (IOD) | 896.40 ± 89.18 | 4254.60 ± 413.66** | 3381.00 ± 432.17∗∗▲▲ | 3646.60 ± 362.37** | 3316.60 ± 439.06∗∗▲▲ | ↓ |
| TLR-4 (IOD) | 973.00 ± 95.13 | 5184.40 ± 566.30** | 3470.60 ± 403.33∗∗▲▲ | 4378.60 ± 748.49** | 3732.20 ± 528.23∗∗▲▲ | ↓ |
IOD: integral optical density. **P < 0.01 versus sham group; ▲▲ P < 0.01 versus model group.
Figure 4Expression levels of type I and type III collagens. Collagen I and collagen III levels in serum (a) and myocardial tissue (b), TGF-β1 expression levels in myocardial tissue (c), and TLR expression levels in myocardial tissue (d).
Overview of collagen expression levels in serum and in myocardial tissue.
| Sham | Model | FS | SNT-LD | SNT-HD | Expression levels | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In serum | ||||||
| Collagen I ( | 2.74 ± 0.40 | 4.11 ± 0.74** | 2.67 ± 0.42▲▲ | 2.43 ± 0.38▲▲ | 2.17 ± 0.21▲▲ | ↓ |
| Collagen III ( | 1.61 ± 0.27 | 2.68 ± 0.43** | 2.00 ± 0.45▲▲ | 2.02 ± 0.47▲▲ | 1.96 ± 0.47▲▲ | ↓ |
| TGF- | 24.95 ± 4.31 | 23.91 ± 5.76 | 22.84 ± 5.07 | 23.75 ± 8.78 | 25.61 ± 7.98 | |
| In myocardial tissue | ||||||
| Collagen I ( | 0.94 ± 0.16 | 1.20 ± 0.15 | 0.86 ± 0.15▲ | 1.03 ± 0.10 | 0.89 ± 0.14▲ | ↓ |
| Collagen III ( | 0.28 ± 0.10 | 0.45 ± 0.04* | 0.33 ± 0.04 | 0.36 ± 0.08 | 0.30 ± 0.04▲ | ↓ |
| TGF- | 5.99 ± 2.17 | 6.48 ± 1.79 | 5.91 ± 2.80 | 5.32 ± 0.49 | 4.08 ± 1.05 | ↓ |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus sham group; ▲ P < 0.05, ▲▲ P < 0.01 versus model group.