| Literature DB >> 24971107 |
S M Mostafa Kamal1, Che Hashim Hassan2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between socioeconomic factors affecting contraceptive use among tribal women of Bangladesh with focusing on son preference over daughter.Entities:
Keywords: Bangladesh; Contraceptive use; Ethnic tribal women; Logistic regression; Sex preference
Year: 2013 PMID: 24971107 PMCID: PMC4064774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Reprod Health ISSN: 1735-9392
Profile of the ethnic tribal women of Rangamati Hill District, Bangladesh
| Characteristics | n | % |
|---|---|---|
| Gender composition of living children | ||
| Only daughter(s) | 183 | 22.7 |
| Only son(s) | 224 | 27.8 |
| Both daughter(s) and son(s) | 399 | 49.5 |
| Tribal groups | ||
| Chakma | 254 | 31.5 |
| Marma | 186 | 23.1 |
| Tanchangya | 179 | 22.2 |
| Tripura | 187 | 23.2 |
| Current age | ||
| <25 | 136 | 16.9 |
| 25-34 | 354 | 43.9 |
| 35+ | 316 | 39.2 |
| Women's education | ||
| No education | 488 | 60.5 |
| Primary | 106 | 13.2 |
| Junior | 110 | 13.6 |
| Secondary+ | 102 | 12.7 |
| Husband's education | ||
| No education | 35.0 | 35.0 |
| Primary | 21.5 | 21.5 |
| Junior | 20.7 | 20.7 |
| Secondary+ | 22.8 | 22.8 |
| Residence | ||
| Rural | 628 | 77.9 |
| Urban | 178 | 22.1 |
| Women's work status | ||
| Homestead/Housewife | 389 | 48.3 |
| Self-employed | 331 | 41.1 |
| Paid employment | 86 | 10.7 |
| Experience of child mortality | ||
| No | 676 | 83.9 |
| Yes | 130 | 16.1 |
| Type of family | ||
| Nuclear | 621 | 77.0 |
| Extended | 185 | 23.0 |
| Have electricity connection in the household | ||
| No | 469 | 58.2 |
| Yes | 337 | 41.8 |
| Have TV | ||
| No | 482 | 59.8 |
| Yes | 324 | 40.2 |
| Number of times married | ||
| Once | 775 | 96.2 |
| More than once | 31 | 3.8 |
| Visited by FPW | ||
| No | 433 | 53.7 |
| Yes | 373 | 46.3 |
| Total | 806 | 100.0 |
Current use status of contraception of the ethnic tribal women by socio-demographic characteristics
| Characteristics | % using contraceptives | Chi-square | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| No | Yes | ||
| Gender composition of living children | 6.90* | ||
| Only daughter(s) | 31.7 | 68.3 | |
| Only son(s) | 30.7 | 69.6 | |
| Both daughter(s) and son(s) | 22.8 | 77.2 | |
| Tribal groups | 16.09 | ||
| Chakma | 21.3 | 78.7 | |
| Marma | 37.6 | 62.4 | |
| Tanchangya | 23.5 | 76.5 | |
| Tripura | 27.3 | 72.7 | |
| Current age | 15.60 | ||
| <25 | 39.7 | 60.3 | |
| 25-34 | 22.0 | 78.0 | |
| 35+ | 26.9 | 73.1 | |
| Women's education | 13.05 | ||
| No education | 30.9 | 69.1 | |
| Primary | 22.6 | 77.4 | |
| Junior | 24.5 | 75.5 | |
| Secondary+ | 14.7 | 85.3 | |
| Husband's education | 23.64 | ||
| No education | 36.2 | 63.8 | |
| Primary | 19.1 | 80.9 | |
| Junior | 28.1 | 71.9 | |
| Secondary+ | 19.0 | 81.0 | |
| Residence | 14.55 | ||
| Rural | 30.1 | 69.9 | |
| Urban | 15.7 | 84.3 | |
| Women's work status | 1.25 | ||
| Homestead/Housewife | 27.0 | 73.0 | |
| Self-employed | 28.1 | 71.9 | |
| Paid employment | 22.1 | 77.9 | |
| Experience of child mortality | 1.17 | ||
| No | 26.2 | 73.8 | |
| Yes | 30.8 | 69.2 | |
| Type of family | 5.30 | ||
| Nuclear | 25.0 | 75.0 | |
| Extended | 33.5 | 66.5 | |
| Have electricity connection in the HH | 11.14 | ||
| No | 31.3 | 68.7 | |
| Yes | 20.8 | 79.2 | |
| Have TV | 15.40 | ||
| No | 32.0 | 68.0 | |
| Yes | 19.4 | 80.6 | |
| Number of times married | 7.55 | ||
| Once | 26.1 | 73.9 | |
| More than once | 48.4 | 51.6 | |
| Visited by FPW | 41.76 | ||
| No | 37.8 | 62.2 | |
| Yes | 17.6 | 82.4 | |
| Total | 26.9 | 73.1 | |
Note: Level of significance
p<0.001
p<0.01
not significant
Figure 1Contraceptive method mix among tribal women and in national level
Crude odds ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) of the logistic regression analysis showing the effects of sex composition of living children on current use of any contraceptive method among the ethnic tribal women
| Characteristics | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Lower | Upper | ||
| Gender composition of living children | |||
| Only daughter(s) | 0.637 | 0.431 | 0.940 |
| Only son(s) | 0.678 | 0.469 | 0.980 |
| Both daughter(s) and son(s) | Reference | --- | --- |
Note: Level of significance
p<0.05.
Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) of the logistic regression analysis showing the effects of socio-demographic characteristics on current use of contraception of the ethnic tribal women
| Characteristics | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Lower | Upper | ||
| Gender composition of living children | |||
| Only daughter(s) | 0.559 | 0.343 | 0.910 |
| Only son(s) | 0.586 | 0.368 | 0.934 |
| Both daughter(s) and son(s) | Reference | --- | --- |
| Tribal groups | |||
| Chakma | Reference | --- | --- |
| Marma | 0.567 | 0.353 | 0.912 |
| Tanchangya | 1.521 | 0.907 | 2.551 |
| Tripura | 0.867 | 0.501 | 1.500 |
| Current age | |||
| <25 | Reference | --- | --- |
| 25-34 | 2.043 | 1.254 | 3.327 |
| 35+ | 1.145 | 0.647 | 2.027 |
| Women's education | |||
| No education | Reference | --- | --- |
| Primary | 1.383 | 0.762 | 2.509 |
| Junior | 1.307 | 0.682 | 2.502 |
| Secondary+ | 2.065 | 0.787 | 5.416 |
| Husband's education | |||
| No education | Reference | --- | --- |
| Primary | 1.827 | 1.098 | 3.039 |
| Junior | 1.069 | 0.626 | 1.827 |
| Secondary+ | 0.915 | 0.430 | 1.947 |
| Residence | |||
| Rural | Reference | --- | --- |
| Urban | 1.622 | 0.885 | 2.975 |
| Women's work status | |||
| Homestead/Housewife | Reference | --- | --- |
| Self-employed | 0.982 | 0.643 | 1.500 |
| Paid employment | 0.816 | 0.395 | 1.685 |
| Experience of child mortality | |||
| No | Reference | --- | --- |
| Yes | 0.944 | 0.583 | 1.528 |
| Type of family | |||
| Nuclear | Reference | --- | --- |
| Extended | 0.579 | 0.383 | 0.876 |
| Have electricity connection in the HH | |||
| No | Reference | --- | --- |
| Yes | 1.476 | 0.885 | 2.460 |
| TV ownership | |||
| No | Reference | --- | --- |
| Yes | 1.458 | 0.923 | 2.302 |
| Number of times married | |||
| Once | Reference | --- | --- |
| More than once | 0.376 | 0.164 | 0.860 |
| Visited by FPW | |||
| No | Reference | --- | --- |
| Yes | 2.776 | 1.960 | 3.932 |
Note: Level of significance
p<0.001
p<0.01
p<0.05
p<0.10
not significant
Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) of the logistic regression analysis showing the effects of parity on current use of contraception of the ethnic tribal women
| Parity | Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval | Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |||
|
|
| |||||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||
| Parity 1: 0 son | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Parity 1: 1 son | 1.43 | 0.84 | 2.43 | 1.41 | 0.81 | 2.45 |
| Parity 2: 0 son | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Parity 2: 1 son | 0.85 | 0.37 | 1.96 | 1.10 | 0.46 | 2.66 |
| Parity 2: 2 sons | 0.55 | 0.22 | 1.35 | 0.72 | 0.28 | 1.84 |
| Parity 3: 0 son | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Parity 3: 1 son | 2.17 | 0.63 | 7.51 | 4.11 | 1.03 | 16.45 |
| Parity 3: 2 sons | 0.83 | 0.26 | 2.65 | 1.30 | 0.37 | 4.60 |
| Parity 3: 3 sons | 2.08 | 0.41 | 10.53 | 3.11 | 0.56 | 17.30 |
| Parity ≥4: 0 son | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Parity ≥4: 1 son | 0.33 | 0.04 | 3.12 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 2.93 |
| Parity ≥4: 2 sons | 0.49 | 0.06 | 4.27 | 0.46 | 0.05 | 4.11 |
| Parity ≥4: ≥3 sons | 0.36 | 0.04 | 3.31 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 3.04 |
Note: Level of significance
p<0.05
Adjusted for women's education, residence, electricity connection in the HHs and TV ownership.