David D Schwartz1, Marni E Axelrad2, Barbara J Anderson2. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX Psychology Service, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX ddschwar@bcm.edu. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX Psychology Service, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether impairments in neurocognitive functioning are detectable at type 1 diabetes diagnosis and associated with subsequent glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Children/adolescents (N = 147) aged 5-18 years completed neuropsychological testing during their inpatient hospitalization for new-onset type 1 diabetes. Test scores were compared with normative data using one-sample Student t tests. Children with onset before 8 years of age were compared with children aged 9-18 years using ANOVA, and associations between neurocognitive performance at diagnosis and glycemic control 1 year postdiagnosis were examined using regression analyses. RESULTS: Children with type 1 diabetes performed significantly below expectations on most neurocognitive measures (P values <0.0001), with large decrements from the normative mean evident in psychomotor speed (>1 SD), visuomotor integration (0.7 SD), and phonemic fluency (0.8 SD). High incidence of impairment (scores less than second percentile) was evident on all tasks except digit span. Dominant-hand psychomotor speed was significantly associated with poor glycemic control (A1C ≥9.5% [80 mmol/mol]; P = 0.032) 1 year postdiagnosis, controlling for race/ethnicity, sex, and reading ability. Impaired psychomotor speed was associated with a 0.77% increase in mean A1C (8.4 mmol/mol). CONCLUSIONS: Deficits were evident in neurocognitive functioning within days of diabetes diagnosis that were associated with diabetes outcomes over 1 year postdiagnosis. Impairment was most apparent in psychomotor speed, consistent with research implicating damage to posterior white matter tracts and associated gray matter regions in type 1 diabetes. Psychomotor impairment may be an early marker for a broader neurobehavioral vulnerability that has implications for long-term diabetes management.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether impairments in neurocognitive functioning are detectable at type 1 diabetes diagnosis and associated with subsequent glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Children/adolescents (N = 147) aged 5-18 years completed neuropsychological testing during their inpatient hospitalization for new-onset type 1 diabetes. Test scores were compared with normative data using one-sample Student t tests. Children with onset before 8 years of age were compared with children aged 9-18 years using ANOVA, and associations between neurocognitive performance at diagnosis and glycemic control 1 year postdiagnosis were examined using regression analyses. RESULTS:Children with type 1 diabetes performed significantly below expectations on most neurocognitive measures (P values <0.0001), with large decrements from the normative mean evident in psychomotor speed (>1 SD), visuomotor integration (0.7 SD), and phonemic fluency (0.8 SD). High incidence of impairment (scores less than second percentile) was evident on all tasks except digit span. Dominant-hand psychomotor speed was significantly associated with poor glycemic control (A1C ≥9.5% [80 mmol/mol]; P = 0.032) 1 year postdiagnosis, controlling for race/ethnicity, sex, and reading ability. Impaired psychomotor speed was associated with a 0.77% increase in mean A1C (8.4 mmol/mol). CONCLUSIONS: Deficits were evident in neurocognitive functioning within days of diabetes diagnosis that were associated with diabetes outcomes over 1 year postdiagnosis. Impairment was most apparent in psychomotor speed, consistent with research implicating damage to posterior white matter tracts and associated gray matter regions in type 1 diabetes. Psychomotor impairment may be an early marker for a broader neurobehavioral vulnerability that has implications for long-term diabetes management.
Authors: Karen A Nunley; Christopher M Ryan; Howard J Aizenstein; J Richard Jennings; Rebecca L MacCloud; Trevor J Orchard; Caterina Rosano Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Diane K Wherrett; Jane L Chiang; Alan M Delamater; Linda A DiMeglio; Stephen E Gitelman; Peter A Gottlieb; Kevan C Herold; Daniel J Lovell; Trevor J Orchard; Christopher M Ryan; Desmond A Schatz; David S Wendler; Carla J Greenbaum Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 19.112