Literature DB >> 24969546

Sensitivity of alternative testing for pancreaticobiliary cancer: a 10-y review of the literature.

Atuhani S Burnett1, Joanelle Bailey2, Joseph B Oliver2, Sushil Ahlawat2, Ravi J Chokshi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biliary strictures present a diagnostic challenge to differentiate benign disease from hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) malignancies. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cytology is commonly performed in these patients; however, its sensitivity for diagnosis of HPB malignancy is poor (41.6%). Many adjunctive tests have been investigated to improve the sensitivity of HPB biopsies. To determine the best tests available, however, we reviewed the literature and performed a comparative analysis of all recently investigated tests and their sensitivities.
METHODS: A PubMed search identified articles published between 2003 and 2014, describing alternate methods for diagnosing HPB malignancies, reported sensitivity, final pathology, and had data available online. Meta-analysis was conducted for tests with multiple articles. Tests with the highest sensitivity and specificities were reported.
RESULTS: A total of 77 studies were identified. Meta-analysis was performed on the sensitivity of EUS-FNA (74.2%), fluorescence in situ hybridization (54.2%), immunostain of insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding Protein 3 (IMP3; 80.4%), IMP3 + cytology (86.4%), K homology domain containing protein overexpressed in cancer (KOC; 85.9%), S100P (77.8%), serum CA19-9 (69.3%), and K-ras mutations (47.0%) to detect malignancy. Ultimately, 12 tests were identified with superior sensitivity (85.3%-100%) and specificities (81.6%-100%) including stricture scrapping, brush sectioning, IMP3 stain + cytology, IMP3+S100A4, bile carcinoembryonic cell adhesion molecule 6 protein (±CA19-9), bile micro RNA (miRNA)-135b, serum miRNA-RNU2-1f, serum miRNA-21 (+CA19-9), peripheral blood mononuclear cells miRNA-27a-3p (+CA19-9), serum miRNA-16 + miRNA-196a (+CA19-9), peripheral blood mononuclear cells mRNAs h-TERT + CK20 + CEA + C-MET.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend immunostaining with a panel of IMP3+KOC + S100A4 + cytology to achieve maximum sensitivity and specificity from HPB biopsies. One biliary protein (carcinoembryonic cell adhesion molecule 6) and several RNAs (bile and blood) offer exceptional sensitivity and specificity and should be tested prospectively in larger populations. Overall, this review identifies several tests to improve the sensitivity of diagnostic algorithms to identify HPB malignancies.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biliary cancer; ERCP; Pancreatic cancer; Sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24969546     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  5 in total

Review 1.  Adult bile duct strictures: differentiating benign biliary stenosis from cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hiep Nguyen Canh; Kenichi Harada
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 2.  Evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures.

Authors:  Christopher L Bowlus; Kristin A Olson; M Eric Gershwin
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Protein Signatures and Tissue Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Patrick W Underwood; Michael H Gerber; Kathy Nguyen; Daniel Delitto; Song Han; Ryan M Thomas; Christopher E Forsmark; Jose G Trevino; William E Gooding; Steven J Hughes
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancy by detection of minichromosome maintenance protein 5 in biliary brush cytology.

Authors:  Margaret G Keane; Matthew T Huggett; Michael H Chapman; Gavin J Johnson; George J Webster; Douglas Thorburn; James Mackay; Stephen P Pereira
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  How SpyGlass™ May Impact Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Practice and Patient Management.

Authors:  Pedro Pereira; Filipe Vilas-Boas; Armando Peixoto; Patrícia Andrade; Joanne Lopes; Guilherme Macedo
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.