Literature DB >> 24969355

Magnetic-resonance imaging for kinetic analysis of permeability changes during focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening and brain drug delivery.

Wen-Yen Chai1, Po-Chun Chu2, Meng-Yen Tsai2, Yu-Chun Lin3, Jiun-Jie Wang4, Kuo-Chen Wei5, Yau-Yau Wai6, Hao-Li Liu7.   

Abstract

Focused ultrasound (FUS) with the presence of microbubbles has been shown to induce transient and local opening of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) for the delivery of therapeutic molecules which normally cannot penetrate into the brain. The success of FUS brain-drug delivery relies on its integration with in-vivo imaging to monitor kinetic change of therapeutic molecules into the brain. In this study, we developed a dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) technique for kinetic analysis of delivered molecules during FUS-BBB opening. Three kinetic parameters (Ktrans, Ve, Kep) were characterized dynamically to describe BBB-permeability at two FUS exposure conditions (0.4 or 0.8MPa) over 24h. Ktrans, defined as the influx volume transfer constant from plasma to EES, and Ve, the EES volume fraction, were both found to be pressure-dependent. Ktrans and Ve showed a peak increase of 0.0086-0.0131min(-1) (for 0.4-0.8MPa pressure), and 0.0431-0.0692, respectively, immediately after FUS exposure. Both parameters subsequently decreased exponentially as a function of time, with estimated half-lives of decay of 2.89-5.3 and 2.2-4.93h, respectively. The kinetics of Kep, defined as the efflux rate constant from the extracellular extravascular space (EES) to the plasma, were complementary to Ktrans, with an initial decrease from 0.2010 to 0.1901min(-1) followed by a significantly longer recovery time (half-life of 17.39-99.92h). Our observations strongly supported the existence of imbalanced and mismatched kinetics of influx (Ktrans) and efflux (Kep) between the plasma and EES, indicating the existence of directional permeability during FUS-BBB opening. We further showed that kinetic change determined by DCE-MRI correlated well with the concentration of Evans Blue (EB)-albumin (coefficient of 0.74-0.89). These findings suggest that MRI kinetic monitoring may serve as an alternative method for in-vivo monitoring of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) change of therapeutic agents during drug delivery to the brain, and provide useful information for future optimization of FUS-BBB opening.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood–brain barrier; Focused ultrasound; Kinetic analysis; MRI; Microbubble

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24969355     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  23 in total

1.  Predicting and optimizing the territory of blood-brain barrier opening by superselective intra-arterial cerebral infusion under dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI guidance.

Authors:  Miroslaw Janowski; Piotr Walczak; Monica S Pearl
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Evaluation of permeability, doxorubicin delivery, and drug retention in a rat brain tumor model after ultrasound-induced blood-tumor barrier disruption.

Authors:  Juyoung Park; Muna Aryal; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Yong-Zhi Zhang; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 3.  Towards controlled drug delivery in brain tumors with microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Scott Schoen; M Sait Kilinc; Hohyun Lee; Yutong Guo; F Levent Degertekin; Graeme F Woodworth; Costas Arvanitis
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 4.  Recent development of contrast agents for magnetic resonance and multimodal imaging of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Danping Zhuang; Huifen Zhang; Genwen Hu; Bing Guo
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 9.429

5.  Noninvasive disconnection of targeted neuronal circuitry sparing axons of passage and nonneuronal cells.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Matthew J Anzivino; Yanrong Zhang; Edward H Bertram; James Woznak; Alexander L Klibanov; Erik Dumont; Max Wintermark; Kevin S Lee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 5.408

6.  Application of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability Imaging in Global Cerebral Edema.

Authors:  J Ivanidze; O N Kallas; A Gupta; E Weidman; H Baradaran; D Mir; A Giambrone; A Z Segal; J Claassen; P C Sanelli
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Drug and gene delivery across the blood-brain barrier with focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Kelsie F Timbie; Brian P Mead; Richard J Price
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  MR-guided blood-brain barrier opening induced by rapid short-pulse ultrasound in non-human primates.

Authors:  Hui Zhou; Yang Liu; Xiaojing Long; Yangzi Qiao; Jo Lee; Xin Liu; Hairong Zheng; Chao Zou
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

9.  Probing Cerebral Metabolism with Hyperpolarized 13C Imaging after Opening the Blood-Brain Barrier with Focused Ultrasound.

Authors:  Edward P Hackett; Bhavya R Shah; Bingbing Cheng; Evan LaGue; Vamsidihara Vemireddy; Manuel Mendoza; Chenchen Bing; Robert M Bachoo; Kelvin L Billingsley; Rajiv Chopra; Jae Mo Park
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 5.780

10.  Neuromodulation accompanying focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening.

Authors:  Po-Chun Chu; Hao-Li Liu; Hsin-Yi Lai; Chung-Yin Lin; Hong-Chieh Tsai; Yu-Cheng Pei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.