Literature DB >> 24969310

Desktop-based computer-assisted orthopedic training system for spinal surgery.

Rohit Rambani1, James Ward2, Warren Viant2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simulation and surgical training has moved on since its inception during the end of the last century. The trainees are getting more exposed to computers and laboratory training in different subspecialties. More needs to be done in orthopedic simulation in spinal surgery. AIMS: To develop a training system for pedicle screw fixation and validate its effectiveness in a cohort of junior orthopedic trainees. TRAINING SYSTEM: Fully simulated computer-navigated training system is used to train junior orthopedic trainees perform pedicle screw insertion in the lumbar spine. Real patient computed tomography scans are used to produce the real-time fluoroscopic images of the lumbar spine.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The training system was developed to simulate pedicle screw insertion in the lumbar spine. A total of 12 orthopedic senior house officers performed pedicle screw insertion in the lumbar spine before and after the training on training system. The results were assessed based on the scoring system, which included the amount of time taken, accuracy of pedicle screw insertion, and the number of exposures requested to complete the procedure.
RESULTS: The result shows a significant improvement in amount of time taken, accuracy of fixation, and the number of exposures after the training on simulator system. This was statistically significant using paired Student t test (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Fully simulated computer-navigated training system is an efficient training tool for young orthopedic trainees. This system can be used to augment training in the operating room, and trainees acquire their skills in the comfort of their study room or in the training room in the hospital. The system has the potential to be used in various other orthopedic procedures for learning of technical skills in a manner aimed at ensuring a smooth escalation in task complexity leading to the better performance of procedures in the operating theater.
Copyright © 2014 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical Knowledge; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Systems-Based Practice; computer navigation; simulation; spinal fractures; training system

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24969310     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  7 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review on Orthopedic Simulators for Psycho-Motor Skill and Surgical Procedure Training.

Authors:  Darshan D Ruikar; Ravindra S Hegadi; K C Santosh
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  Simulation and resident education in spinal neurosurgery.

Authors:  Parker E Bohm; Paul M Arnold
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 3.  Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw instrumentation in treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Tian; Lai-Yong Tu; Wen-Fei Gu; En-Feng Zhang; Zhen-Bin Wang; Ge Chu; Haer Ka; Jiang Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Virtual reality in spinal endoscopy: a paradigm shift in education to support spine surgeons.

Authors:  Ryan Lohre; Jeffrey C Wang; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Danny P Goel
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

5.  Cadaveric Spinal Surgery Simulation: A Comparison of Cadaver Types.

Authors:  James E Tomlinson; Marina Yiasemidou; Anna L Watts; Dave J H Roberts; Jake Timothy
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-09-29

6.  Analysis of Tools Used in Assessing Technical Skills and Operative Competence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgical Training: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hannah K James; Anna W Chapman; Giles T R Pattison; Joanne D Fisher; Damian R Griffin
Journal:  JBJS Rev       Date:  2020-06

Review 7.  XR (Extended Reality: Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality) Technology in Spine Medicine: Status Quo and Quo Vadis.

Authors:  Tadatsugu Morimoto; Takaomi Kobayashi; Hirohito Hirata; Koji Otani; Maki Sugimoto; Masatsugu Tsukamoto; Tomohito Yoshihara; Masaya Ueno; Masaaki Mawatari
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.