Literature DB >> 24969154

Challenges of cluster randomized trials.

Michael J Campbell1.   

Abstract

Cluster randomized trials are trials that randomize clusters of people, rather than individuals. They are becoming increasingly common. A number of innovations have been developed recently, particularly in the calculation of the required size of a cluster trial, the handling of missing data, designs to minimize recruitment bias, the ethics of cluster randomized trials and the stepped wedge design. This article will highlight and illustrate these developments. It will also discuss issues with regards to the reporting of cluster randomized trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cluster randomized trials; covariate adjustment; ethics; missing data; recruitment bias; sample size; stepped wedge

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24969154     DOI: 10.2217/cer.14.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Eff Res        ISSN: 2042-6305            Impact factor:   1.744


  7 in total

1.  Beyond interviews and focus groups: a framework for integrating innovative qualitative methods into randomised controlled trials of complex public health interventions.

Authors:  Katy Davis; Nicole Minckas; Virginia Bond; Cari Jo Clark; Tim Colbourn; Sarah J Drabble; Therese Hesketh; Zelee Hill; Joanna Morrison; Oliver Mweemba; David Osrin; Audrey Prost; Janet Seeley; Maryam Shahmanesh; Esther J Spindler; Erin Stern; Katrina M Turner; Jenevieve Mannell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Effect of a Modified Hospital Elder Life Program on Delirium and Length of Hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Cheryl Chia-Hui Chen; Hsiu-Ching Li; Jin-Tung Liang; I-Rue Lai; Jerry Dwi Trijoyo Purnomo; Yi-Ting Yang; Been-Ren Lin; John Huang; Ching-Yao Yang; Yu-Wen Tien; Chiung-Nien Chen; Ming-Tsan Lin; Guan-Hua Huang; Sharon K Inouye
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Selection bias and subject refusal in a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rochelle Yang; Barry L Carter; Tyler H Gums; Brian M Gryzlak; Yinghui Xu; Barcey T Levy
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Evaluation of machine learning solutions in medicine.

Authors:  Tony Antoniou; Muhammad Mamdani
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 8.262

5. 

Authors:  Tony Antoniou; Muhammad Mamdani
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Impact of general practice endorsement on the social gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening.

Authors:  Rosalind Raine; Stephen W Duffy; Jane Wardle; Francesca Solmi; Stephen Morris; Rosemary Howe; Ines Kralj-Hans; Julia Snowball; Nicholas Counsell; Sue Moss; Allan Hackshaw; Christian von Wagner; Gemma Vart; Lesley M McGregor; Samuel G Smith; Stephen Halloran; Graham Handley; Richard F Logan; Sandra Rainbow; Steve Smith; Mary C Thomas; Wendy Atkin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Effect of a Fracture Liaison Service on the Rate of Subsequent Fracture Among Patients With a Fragility Fracture in the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT): A Trial Protocol.

Authors:  Camilla Andreasen; Lene B Solberg; Trude Basso; Tove T Borgen; Cecilie Dahl; Torbjørn Wisløff; Gunhild Hagen; Ellen M Apalset; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Wender Figved; Lars M Hübschle; Jens M Stutzer; Jan Elvenes; Ragnar M Joakimsen; Unni Syversen; Erik F Eriksen; Lars Nordsletten; Frede Frihagen; Tone K Omsland; Åshild Bjørnerem
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-12-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.