Literature DB >> 24968879

Critical assessment of complications associated with use of the Pipeline Embolization Device.

Min S Park1, Felipe C Albuquerque1, Michael Nanaszko1, Matthew R Sanborn1, Karam Moon1, Adib A Abla2, Cameron G McDougall1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has become an important tool in the treatment of complex cerebrovascular pathology since it was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in April 2011.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the overall complication rate (permanent and transient) associated with the use of this new device from a single institution.
METHODS: We retrospectively examined a prospectively maintained database of our patients treated with the PED since its availability to the current time. 126 patients (24 men, 102 women; age range 14-83 years, mean 59.8 years) were treated for a total of 137 intracranial aneurysms, one cervical internal carotid artery dissection, one cervical vertebral artery dissection, and one carotid-cavernous fistula with a total of 217 PEDs (1.72 PED/patient).
RESULTS: A total of 40 complications were experienced by 33 patients in our cohort. Four complications (4/126, 3.2%) in four patients were permanent, resulting in three deaths and one permanent disability. The other 36 complications (28.6%) occurred in 29 patients, all of whom went on to recover completely. The total complication rate associated with the use of the PED was 31.7% (40/126).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a low rate of permanent complications associated with the PED in this series, the total complication rate was high. This finding supports the conclusion that this device should be reserved for the most challenging aneurysms. Patients should be advised of this higher rate of transient periprocedural complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: IRB#:14BN027 Q7. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Device

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24968879     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  16 in total

1.  Traumatic cervical internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm in a child refractory to initial endovascular treatment: case report and technical considerations.

Authors:  Arthur Wang; Justin G Santarelli; Michael F Stiefel
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Balloon sandwich technique for retrieval of fractured delivery wire of pipeline stent.

Authors:  Russell Cerejo; Mark Bain; Thomas Masaryk
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Direct carotid-cavernous fistula: A complication of, and treatment with, flow diversion.

Authors:  Krishna Amuluru; Fawaz Al-Mufti; Chirag D Gandhi; Charles J Prestigiacomo; I Paul Singh
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Flow Diversion in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Pragmatic Randomized Care Trial.

Authors:  J Raymond; D Iancu; W Boisseau; J D B Diestro; R Klink; M Chagnon; J Zehr; B Drake; H Lesiuk; A Weill; D Roy; M W Bojanowski; C Chaalala; J L Rempel; C O'Kelly; M M Chow; S Bracard; T E Darsaut
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.966

5.  Pipeline Embolization Device with or without Adjunctive Coil Embolization: Analysis of Complications from the IntrePED Registry.

Authors:  M S Park; C Kilburg; P Taussky; F C Albuquerque; D F Kallmes; E I Levy; P Jabbour; I Szikora; E Boccardi; R A Hanel; A Bonafé; C G McDougall
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Treatment of carotid cavernous sinus fistulas with flow diverters. A case report and systematic review.

Authors:  Theodosios Stamatopoulos; Evangelos Anagnostou; Sotirios Plakas; Konstantinos Papachristou; Panagiotis Lagos; Apostolos Samelis; Shahram Derakhshani; Aristotelis Mitsos
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 1.610

7.  Usefulness of the Pipeline Embolic Device for Large and Giant Carotid Cavernous Aneurysms.

Authors:  Shigeru Miyachi; Ryo Hiramatsu; Hiroyuki Ohnishi; Ryokichi Yagi; Toshihiko Kuroiwa
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2017-09-05

8.  Pipeline embolization device as primary treatment for cervical internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysms.

Authors:  Arthur Wang; Justin Santarelli; Michael F Stiefel
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-01-19

Review 9.  Bailout Strategies and Complications Associated with the Use of Flow-Diverting Stents for Treating Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Fawaz Al-Mufti; Eric R Cohen; Krishna Amuluru; Vikas Patel; Mohammad El-Ghanem; Rolla Nuoman; Neil Majmundar; Neha S Dangayach; Philip M Meyers
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2018-10-16

10.  Inadvertent Complication of a Pipeline Embolization Device for Treatment with Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm : Distal Tip Fracture of Delivery Wire.

Authors:  Jung Soo Park; Hyo Sung Kwak; Jong Myong Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.