Paul A Della Gatta1, David Cameron-Smith, Jonathan M Peake. 1. Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Intense resistance exercise causes mechanical loading of skeletal muscle, followed by muscle adaptation. Chemotactic factors likely play an important role in these processes. PURPOSE: We investigated the time course of changes in the expression and tissue localization of several key chemotactic factors in skeletal muscle during the early phase of recovery following resistance exercise. METHODS: Muscle biopsy samples were obtained from vastus lateralis of eight untrained men (22 ± 0.5 years) before and 2, 4 and 24 h after three sets of leg press, squat and leg extension at 80 % 1-RM. RESULTS: Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (95×), interleukin-8 (2,300×), IL-6 (317×), urokinase-type plasminogen activator (15×), vascular endothelial growth factor (2×) and fractalkine (2.5×) mRNA was significantly elevated 2 h post-exercise. Interleukin-8 (38×) and interleukin-6 (58×) protein was also significantly elevated 2 h post-exercise, while monocyte chemotactic protein-1 protein was significantly elevated at 2 h (22×) and 4 h (21×) post-exercise. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and interleukin-8 were expressed by cells residing in the interstitial space between muscle fibers and, in some cases, were co-localized with CD68 + macrophages, PAX7 + satellite cells and blood vessels. However, the patterns of staining were inconclusive and not consistent. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, resistance exercise stimulated a marked increase in the mRNA and protein expression of various chemotactic factors in skeletal muscle. Myofibers were not the dominant source of these factors. These findings suggest that chemotactic factors regulate remodeling/adaptation of skeletal muscle during the early phase of recovery following resistance exercise.
INTRODUCTION: Intense resistance exercise causes mechanical loading of skeletal muscle, followed by muscle adaptation. Chemotactic factors likely play an important role in these processes. PURPOSE: We investigated the time course of changes in the expression and tissue localization of several key chemotactic factors in skeletal muscle during the early phase of recovery following resistance exercise. METHODS: Muscle biopsy samples were obtained from vastus lateralis of eight untrained men (22 ± 0.5 years) before and 2, 4 and 24 h after three sets of leg press, squat and leg extension at 80 % 1-RM. RESULTS:Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (95×), interleukin-8 (2,300×), IL-6 (317×), urokinase-type plasminogen activator (15×), vascular endothelial growth factor (2×) and fractalkine (2.5×) mRNA was significantly elevated 2 h post-exercise. Interleukin-8 (38×) and interleukin-6 (58×) protein was also significantly elevated 2 h post-exercise, while monocyte chemotactic protein-1 protein was significantly elevated at 2 h (22×) and 4 h (21×) post-exercise. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and interleukin-8 were expressed by cells residing in the interstitial space between muscle fibers and, in some cases, were co-localized with CD68 + macrophages, PAX7 + satellite cells and blood vessels. However, the patterns of staining were inconclusive and not consistent. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, resistance exercise stimulated a marked increase in the mRNA and protein expression of various chemotactic factors in skeletal muscle. Myofibers were not the dominant source of these factors. These findings suggest that chemotactic factors regulate remodeling/adaptation of skeletal muscle during the early phase of recovery following resistance exercise.
Authors: Gordon L Warren; Tracy Hulderman; Dawn Mishra; Xin Gao; Lyndell Millecchia; Laura O'Farrell; William A Kuziel; Petia P Simeonova Journal: FASEB J Date: 2004-12-15 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Shuen-Ei Chen; Eric Gerken; Yingmin Zhang; Mei Zhan; Raja K Mohan; Andrew S Li; Michael B Reid; Yi-Ping Li Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2005-08-03 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Gordon L Warren; Laura O'Farrell; Mukesh Summan; Tracy Hulderman; Dawn Mishra; Michael I Luster; William A Kuziel; Petia P Simeonova Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2004-01-14 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Jakob L Nielsen; Per Aagaard; Tatyana A Prokhorova; Tobias Nygaard; Rune D Bech; Charlotte Suetta; Ulrik Frandsen Journal: J Physiol Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Aliza B Rubenstein; J Matthew Hinkley; Venugopalan D Nair; German Nudelman; Robert A Standley; Fanchao Yi; GongXin Yu; Todd A Trappe; Marcas M Bamman; Scott W Trappe; Lauren M Sparks; Bret H Goodpaster; Rick B Vega; Stuart C Sealfon; Elena Zaslavsky; Paul M Coen Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Marissa K Caldow; Emily E Thomas; Michael J Dale; Grant R Tomkinson; Jonathan D Buckley; David Cameron-Smith Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2015-09
Authors: David C Nieman; Kevin A Zwetsloot; Dominic D Lomiwes; Mary P Meaney; Roger D Hurst Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Brian McDonagh; Siobhan M Scullion; Aphrodite Vasilaki; Natalie Pollock; Anne McArdle; Malcolm J Jackson Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 7.376