Literature DB >> 24967523

Associations between statin adherence level, health care costs, and utilization.

Yongming Zhao1, Steve Zabriski, Carl Bertram.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence of the associations between statin adherence level, health care costs, and utilization is still limited. It is not clear whether better clinical outcomes derived from increasing statin adherence levels can be translated into cost savings and lower health care utilization.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the associations between statin adherence level, health care costs, hospital admission, and emergency room (ER) visits after statin therapy is taken for 1 year.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to examine whether higher statin adherence level, measured as medication possession ratio (MPR), is associated with lower health care costs and hospital admission rate and with fewer ER visits. The study sample consisted of adult patients aged 18-64 years on an index date with continuous enrollment 12 months prior to and 12 months after the index date (the first fill date of a statin between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010). Study subjects also needed to have a minimum of 2 ICD-9-CM diagnoses for hyperlipidemia or diabetes in the pre-index date period. Main data sources were medical and prescription (Rx) claims, as well as enrollment files provided by a health benefit program and a medical carrier of state government and public school employees in a midwestern state. Study subjects were stratified into 8 groups based on statin MPR level: less than  40%, 40%-59%, 60%-69%, 70%-79%, 80%-84%, 85%-89%, 90%-95%, and 96%-100%. Total medical and Rx costs, as well as all-cause hospital admission rates and ER visits in a year after the index date, were computed based on medical and Rx claims. A separate breakout of statin costs, part of total Rx costs, was also computed. Generalized linear models (GLMs) were developed to test the hypothesis that higher statin adherence levels are associated with lower health care costs and utilization.
RESULTS: A total of 10,312 subjects met the criteria and were selected. The average statin MPR in a year after the index date was 71.95%. Mean total costs (medical + Rx) in a year after the index date were $6,064.36. There were significant variations in Rx costs and total health care costs as well as ER visits among the 8 patient groups stratified using the statin MPR level. A GLM model showed that all the ratios of health care costs among groups with statin MPR from 40%-59%, 60%-69%, 80%-84%, 85%-89%, 90%-95%, and 96%-100% were larger than 1 and statistically significant compared with the reference group with statin MPR less than 40%, suggesting those groups had higher health care costs than the reference group with the lowest statin MPR level. Based on a logistic regression model of hospital utilization for this study population, all the odds ratios of all-cause hospitalization among the groups with higher statin MPR were not statistically significant, suggesting that the likelihood of hospitalization for patients with higher statin MPR was not statistically lower than that of the reference group with statin MPR less than 40%. After controlling for all other covariates, another GLM model based on the Poisson distribution and log link function showed that ratios of ER visits among groups with statin MPR from 60%-69%, 80%-84%, 85%-89%, 90%-95%, and 96%-100% were smaller than 1 and statistically significant, suggesting the groups had fewer ER visits than the reference group with statin MPR less than  40%. The patient group with statin MPR from 96%-100% was estimated to have the lowest number of ER visits.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study results show that much higher statin adherence levels are related to fewer ER visits after statin treatment is taken for a year among beneficiaries; however, the study is inconclusive whether higher statin adherence levels are associated with lower overall health care costs in a year after statin therapy is taken. Further research is needed to evaluate the associations between statin adherence level, the cost of cardiovascular care alone, and utilization over a longer period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24967523     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.7.703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm


  10 in total

Review 1.  When compliance is an issue-how to enhance statin adherence and address adverse effects.

Authors:  Kim Birtcher
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Chronic Medication Nonadherence and Potentially Preventable Healthcare Utilization and Spending Among Medicare Patients.

Authors:  Yongkang Zhang; James H Flory; Yuhua Bao
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.473

Review 3.  Economic impact of medication non-adherence by disease groups: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rachelle Louise Cutler; Fernando Fernandez-Llimos; Michael Frommer; Charlie Benrimoj; Victoria Garcia-Cardenas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The Association Between Medication Adherence for Chronic Conditions and Digital Health Activity Tracking: Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Tom Quisel; Luca Foschini; Susan M Zbikowski; Jessie L Juusola
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Effectiveness of mailed letters to improve medication adherence among Medicare Advantage Plan participants with chronic conditions.

Authors:  Amanda Mann; Tara W Esse; Omar Serna; Liana D Castel; Susan M Abughosh
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  The influence of statins on aortic aneurysm after operation: A retrospective nationwide study.

Authors:  Kuang-Ming Liao; Shih-Wei Wang; Chun-Hui Lu; Chung-Yu Chen; Yaw-Bin Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Clinician prescription of lipid-lowering drugs and achievement of treatment goals in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ana Cristina García-Ulloa; Claudia Lechuga-Fonseca; Fabiola Mabel Del Razo-Olvera; Carlos Alberto Aguilar-Salinas; Karla Ivette Galaviz; K M Venkat Narayan; Sergio Hernández-Jiménez
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2021-02

8.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on impact of suboptimal use of antidepressants, bisphosphonates, and statins on healthcare resource utilisation and healthcare cost.

Authors:  Kyu Hyung Park; Leonie Tickle; Henry Cutler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Healthcare resource utilization in patients on lipid-lowering therapies outside Western Europe and North America: findings of the cross-sectional observational International ChoLesterol management Practice Study (ICLPS).

Authors:  Lieven Annemans; Joseph Azuri; Khalid Al-Rasadi; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Veronique Daclin; Florence Mercier; Nicolas Danchin
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Identifying temporal patterns of adherence to antidepressants, bisphosphonates and statins, and associated patient factors.

Authors:  Kyu Hyung Park; Leonie Tickle; Henry Cutler
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2021-11-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.