Literature DB >> 24967471

A bibliometric analysis on top-cited articles in pain research.

Kun-Yang Chuang, Yuh-Shan Ho.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The field of pain-related research has gained more attention as the prevalence of chronic pain increased over the years. The objective of this research was to identify highly cited papers, as well as contributors, to pain-related research.
DESIGN: Pain-related articles published from 1900 to 2011 were screened, and highly cited papers, with at least 100 citations since publication, were identified and selected for a bibliometric analysis. The total number of papers, authorship, and collaboration statistics are presented for countries, institutions, and authors. To assess contributions, a new indicator, the major contributor index (MCI), was used. Citation trends for all papers, as well as for top papers, are presented.
RESULTS: A total of 7,327 articles, 2.4% of all pain related articles, had received at least 100 citations since publication. In recent decades, top-cited articles have reached a citation peak more quickly, and have shown a more-rapid decreasing trend, compared with top-cited articles from earlier decades. The leading countries were United States, U.K., Canada, and Germany. The leading institutions were Harvard University, University of California, San Francisco, University of Texas, and University of Washington. MCI varied among leading institutions, as well as among individual authors.
CONCLUSIONS: An indicator like the MCI can provide a proxy for the contributions made by an individual or institution. It reflects the independent research ability and leadership. In future evaluations of institution or individual performances, the MCI should be included, together with the number of total papers, to provide a better profile of research performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24967471     DOI: 10.1111/pme.12308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  8 in total

1.  Levels of Evidence in the Plastic Surgery Literature: A Citation Analysis of the Top 50 'Classic' Papers.

Authors:  Kenneth M Joyce; Cormac W Joyce; John C Kelly; Jack L Kelly; Sean M Carroll
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-07-14

Review 2.  Scientific landscape and trend analysis of keloid research: a 30-year bibliometric review.

Authors:  Yuming Chong; Xiao Long; Yuh-Shan Ho
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-06

3.  The 100 most-cited articles on aortic dissection.

Authors:  Ping Lai; Yuan-Hui Liu; Jin-Hua Xue; Peng-Cheng He; Yue-Qun Qiu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 4.  The Canadian Pain Society: A historical perspective.

Authors:  Guillaume Léonard; Manon Choinière; Gilles Lavigne; Barry J Sessle
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2020-10-06

5.  Bibliometric Analysis of Research Articles on Pain in the Elderly Published from 2000 to 2019.

Authors:  Yanqiao Zhao; Ziping Zhang; Suimin Guo; Beibei Feng; Xiaoyu Zhao; Xueqiang Wang; Yuling Wang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 6.  Research Trends and Hotspots of Q Fever Research: A Bibliometric Analysis 1990-2019.

Authors:  Muhammad Farooq; Aman Ullah Khan; Hosny El-Adawy; Katja Mertens-Scholz; Iahtasham Khan; Heinrich Neubauer; Yuh-Shan Ho
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Citation Classics in Asthma Research: The 100 Top-Cited Articles During 1960-2014.

Authors:  Sha Li; Cheng-Jie Zhu; Yu-Lan Qu; Yu-Chao Dong; Yan Shang; Chong Bai
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Scientometric overview of nursing research on pain management.

Authors:  Hale Turhan Damar; Ozlem Bilik; Guzin Ozdagoglu; Aşkın Ozdagoglu; Muhammet Damar
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2018-09-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.