| Literature DB >> 24967312 |
En-Ju D Lin1, C Wymond Symes2, Andrea Townsend-Nicholson3, Matthias Klugmann2, Claudia B Klugmann2, Klaus Lehnert4, Dahna Fong2, Deborah Young2, Matthew J During1.
Abstract
We have previously demonstrated the therapeutic potential of inducing a humoral response with autoantibodies to the N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor using a genetic approach. In this study, we generated three recombinant proteins to different functional domains of the NMDA receptor, which is implicated in mediating brain tolerance, specifically NR1[21-375], NR1[313-619], NR1[654-800], and an intracellular scaffolding protein, Homer1a, with a similar anatomical expression pattern. All peptides showed similar antigenicity and antibody titers following systemic vaccination, and all animals thrived. Two months following vaccination, rats were administered the potent neurotoxin, kainic acid. NR1[21-375] animals showed an antiepileptic phenotype but no neuroprotection. Remarkably, despite ineffective antiepileptic activity, 6 of 7 seizing NR1[654-800] rats showed absolutely no injury with only minimal changes in the remaining animal, whereas the majority of persistently seizing rats in the other groups showed moderate to severe hippocampal injury. CREB, BDNF, and HSP70, proteins associated with preconditioning, were selectively upregulated in the hippocampus of NR1[654-800] animals, consistent with the observed neuroprotective phenotype. These results identify NR1 epitopes important in conferring anticonvulsive and neuroprotective effects and support the concept of an immunological strategy to induce a chronic state of tolerance in the brain.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24967312 PMCID: PMC4045558 DOI: 10.1155/2014/103213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Neurosci ISSN: 2314-4661
Seizure-induced hippocampal cell death.
| Vaccination group | Number of rats examined | Hippocampal injury in CA1 and CA3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (−) | (+) | (++) | (+++) | ||
| naïve | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| NR1[21–375] | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| NR1[313–619] | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| NR1[654–800] | 7 | 6* | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Homer1a | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
The brains of rats to reach stage 4 or beyond were analysed by TUNEL labeling. Hippocampal injury was graded as follows: (−) no injury; (+) minimal injury (1–20 TUNEL labelled cells); (++) moderate (21–100 TUNEL cells); (+++) high (>100 TUNEL cells). *P < 0.05compared to either Homer1a or naïve groups.
Figure 1Generation of the NR1 fragments and screening of resultant vaccine antisera. (a) Schematic representation of the NMDAR1 subunit and (b) the engineered and generated NR1 fragments (figure adapted from http://www.pharmacology2000.com/Central/Opioids/Advanced_opioids3.htm). (c) SDS-PAGE analysis of washed inclusion bodies from E. coli expressing each of the NR1 fragments, showing degree of purity and molecular weight prior to vaccination. (d) Protein-G purified IgG from NR1 preimmune or immune rat sera was used at 100 mg/mL on naïve hippocampal sections. The affinity-purified commercial NR1 polyclonal antibody (Chemicon AB1516) was used at 1 : 200. Scale bar = 400 μm.
Figure 2Effects of the NR1 fragments as vaccine antigens in a systemic KA seizure model. (a) Latency to reach each of the three defined seizure stages. Stage 2: wet dog shakes, Stage 4: forearm clonus, and Stage 5: forearm clonus accompanied by rearing and falling on back. Values represent mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. a P < 0.05 with respect to naïve group, b P < 0.05 with respect to NR1[21–375], c P < 0.01 with respect to NR1[313–619]. (b) The percentage of rats to reach each of the stages. *P < 0.05, chi-square test.
Figure 3Seizure-induced damage in the hippocampus following systemic KA administration. TUNEL labeling (arrows) of neuronal cell death in the CA1 region of the hippocampus indicates the extent of damage in representative brain sections of NR1 vaccinated and control rats four days after receiving systemic kainic acid. Each image was from a different animal with the ID given in the bottom left corner. The vaccination treatment each rat had is given on the left. Scale bar = 200 μm.
Figure 4Expression analysis of hippocampal lysates from vaccinated rats. (a) Representative immunoblots of hippocampal samples obtained from vaccinated rats. For each group, samples from five individual animals were screened three times for every antigen, standardised to GAPDH, and graphed as a function of relative expression to a nonvaccinated group. (b) Values represent mean ± SEM. # P < 0.05, *P < 0.01, **P < 0.001 with respect to Homer1a rats.
(a)
| Vaccination group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NR1[21–375] | NR1[313–619] | NR1[654–800] | Homer1a | |
| Titer at week 7 | 10082 ± 4884 | 10670 ± 4405 | 23457 ± 8300 | 27174 ± 14572 |
| Titer at week 18 | 5370 ± 1377 | 5712 ± 1471 | 8891 ± 1836 | 11586 ± 2886 |
Sera were collected 7 and 18 weeks after vaccination and antigen-specific titers were determined. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
(b)
| Vaccination group | Rat ID | Antigen-specific titer | OD at 450 nm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 : 90 | 1 : 810 | |||
| NR1[21–375] | H6 | 17556 | 0.432 (0.069) | 0.185 (0.066) |
| H3 | 8982 | 0.336 (0.066) | 0.163 (0.069) | |
| NR1[313–619] | K2 | 23879 | 0.491 (0.069) | 0.484 (0.074) |
| K19 | 13194 | 0.461 (0.079) | 0.345 (0.058) | |
| NR1[654–800] | J3 | 39149 | 0.516 (0.061) | 0.364 (0.058) |
| J15 | 23879 | 0.376 (0.057) | 0.243 (0.065) | |
| Homer1a | L6 | 41360 | 0.082 (0.062) | 0.070 (0.062) |
| L20 | 3729 | 0.068 (0.062) | 0.066 (0.063) | |
| AB1516 | 0.420 | 0.199 | ||
OD at 450 nm represents antibodies bound to immobilised NR1 protein in an antigen capture ELISA (see Section 2). OD at 450 nm for preimmune sera is shown in brackets.