Literature DB >> 24967205

Comparison of scanning electron microscopy findings regarding biofilm colonization with microbiological results in nasolacrimal stents for external, endoscopic and transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy.

Melike Balikoglu-Yilmaz1, Tolga Yilmaz1, Sule Cetinel2, Umit Taskin3, Ayse Banu Esen4, Muhittin Taskapili1, Timur Kose5.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare bacterial biofilm colonization in lacrimal stents following external dacryocystorhinostomy (EX-DCR), endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR), and transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy (TC-DCR) with multidiode laser.
METHODS: This prospective study included 30 consecutive patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction who underwent EXT-, EN-, or TC-DCR. Thirty removed lacrimal stent fragments and conjunctival samples were cultured. The lacrimal stent biofilms were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
RESULTS: Eleven (36.7%) of the 30 lacrimal stent cultures were positive for aerobic bacteria (most commonly Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). However anaerobic bacteria and fungi were not identified in the lacrimal stent cultures. Twenty-seven (90%) patients had biofilm-positive lacrimal stents. The conjunctival culture positivity after the DCR, biofilm positivity on stents, the grade of biofilm colonization, and the presence of mucus and coccoid and rod-shaped organisms did not significantly differ between any of the groups (P>0.05). However, a significant difference was found when the SEM results were compared to the results of the lacrimal stent and conjunctival cultures (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Type of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery did not affect the biofilm colonization of the lacrimal stents. SEM also appears to be more precise than microbiological culture for evaluating the presence of biofilms on lacrimal stents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biofilms; dacryocystitis; epiphora; nasolacrimal duct obstruction; scanning electron microscopy

Year:  2014        PMID: 24967205      PMCID: PMC4067673          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  33 in total

1.  Bacterial biofilms and ocular infections.

Authors:  Michael E Zegans; Robert M Q Shanks; George A O'Toole
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 2.  Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Deepa Anijeet; Lynne Dolan; Caroline J Macewen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-01-19

3.  Biofilm colonisation in nasolacrimal stents.

Authors:  A Ibáñez; A Trinidad; J R García-Berrocal; D Gómez; J San Román; R Ramírez-Camacho
Journal:  B-ENT       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 0.082

4.  Infectious endophthalmitis in adult eyes receiving Boston type I keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Rajeev S Ramchandran; David A Diloreto; Mina M Chung; David M Kleinman; Ronald P Plotnik; Paul Graman; James V Aquavella
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  [Anatomic and subjective success of structured surgical treatment strategy in the management of chronic epiphora - a postoperative analysis of contentment].

Authors:  C Eisenbeis; B Neppert; T Menke; S Pape; S Schrader; G Geerling; M Müller
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 0.700

6.  The detection of bacteria and bacterial biofilms in punctal plug holes.

Authors:  J Sugita; N Yokoi; N J Fullwood; A J Quantock; Y Takada; Y Nakamura; S Kinoshita
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Isolation, vancomycin resistance and biofilm production of Staphylococcus epidermidis from patients with conjunctivitis, corneal ulcers, and endophthalmitis.

Authors:  Marco Adán Juárez-Verdayes; Miguel Angel Reyes-López; Mario Eugenio Cancino-Díaz; Susana Muñoz-Salas; Sandra Rodríguez-Martínez; Francisco Javier Zavala-Díaz de la Serna; César Hugo Hernández-Rodríguez; Juan Carlos Cancino-Díaz
Journal:  Rev Latinoam Microbiol       Date:  2006 Jul-Dec

8.  Increased resistance of contact lens-related bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial activity of soft contact lens care solutions.

Authors:  Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Yoshifumi Imamura; Jyotsna Chandra; Changping Yu; Pranab K Mukherjee; Eric Pearlman; Mahmoud A Ghannoum
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Biofilm formation on pyrolytic carbon heart valves: influence of surface free energy, roughness, and bacterial species.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Litzler; Laetitia Benard; Noëlle Barbier-Frebourg; Sebastien Vilain; Thierry Jouenne; Eric Beucher; Claude Bunel; Jean-François Lemeland; Jean-Paul Bessou
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Description, etiology, and prevention of an outbreak of diffuse lamellar keratitis after LASIK.

Authors:  Alberto Villarrubia; Elisa Palacín; Miguel Gómez del Río; Purificación Martínez
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  4 in total

1.  Yeast Surface Display of Escherichia coli Enterotoxin and Its Effects of Intestinal Microflora and Mucosal Immunity.

Authors:  ShiYu Li; Zhou Sha; Xiaoxu Wang; Zhaoyang Bu; Li Wang; Xiaohui Guan; Xulong Lang; Xinglong Wang
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  Biofilms in infections of the eye.

Authors:  Paulo J M Bispo; Wolfgang Haas; Michael S Gilmore
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2015-03-23

3.  Conjunctival bacterial flora in fellow eyes of patients with unilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction and its changes after successful dacryocystorhinostomy surgery.

Authors:  Bahram Eshraghi; Sayyed Amirpooya Alemzadeh; Zohreh Abedinifar
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-03

4.  Species-specific characteristics of the biofilm generated in silicone tube: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Dong Ju Kim; Joo-Hee Park; Minwook Chang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.209

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.