Cemalettin Cabi1, Isil Bahar Sayman Muslubas2, Ayse Yesim Aydin Oral3, Metin Dastan4. 1. Eye Clinic, Sinop Government Hospital, Sinop 57000, Turkey. 2. Eye Clinic, Semdinli Government Hospital, Hakkari 30800, Turkey. 3. Eye Clinic, Dr Lutfi Kİrdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34600, Turkey. 4. Eye Clinic, Kars Governmet Hospital, Kars 36000, Turkey.
Abstract
AIM: To compare the efficacies of patching and penalization therapies for the treatment of amblyopia patients. METHODS: The records of 64 eyes of 50 patients 7 to 16y of age who had presented to our clinics with a diagnosis of amblyopia, were evaluated retrospectively. Forty eyes of 26 patients who had received patching therapy and 24 eyes of 24 patients who had received penalization therapy included in this study. The latencies and amplitudes of visual evoked potential (VEP) records and best corrected visual acuities (BCVA) of these two groups were compared before and six months after the treatment. RESULTS: In both patching and the penalization groups, the visual acuities increased significantly following the treatments (P<0.05). The latency measurements of the P100 wave obtained at 1.0°, 15 arc min. Patterns of both groups significantly decreased following the 6-months-treatment. However, the amplitude measurements increased (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The patching and the penalization methods, which are the main methods used in the treatment of amblyopia, were also effective over the age of 7y, which has been accepted as the critical age for the treatment of amblyopia.
AIM: To compare the efficacies of patching and penalization therapies for the treatment of amblyopiapatients. METHODS: The records of 64 eyes of 50 patients 7 to 16y of age who had presented to our clinics with a diagnosis of amblyopia, were evaluated retrospectively. Forty eyes of 26 patients who had received patching therapy and 24 eyes of 24 patients who had received penalization therapy included in this study. The latencies and amplitudes of visual evoked potential (VEP) records and best corrected visual acuities (BCVA) of these two groups were compared before and six months after the treatment. RESULTS: In both patching and the penalization groups, the visual acuities increased significantly following the treatments (P<0.05). The latency measurements of the P100 wave obtained at 1.0°, 15 arc min. Patterns of both groups significantly decreased following the 6-months-treatment. However, the amplitude measurements increased (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The patching and the penalization methods, which are the main methods used in the treatment of amblyopia, were also effective over the age of 7y, which has been accepted as the critical age for the treatment of amblyopia.
Authors: J Vernon Odom; Michael Bach; Mitchell Brigell; Graham E Holder; Daphne L McCulloch; Alma Patrizia Tormene Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2009-10-14 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Michael X Repka; Susan A Cotter; Roy W Beck; Raymond T Kraker; Eileen E Birch; Donald F Everett; Richard W Hertle; Jonathan M Holmes; Graham E Quinn; Nicholas A Sala; Mitchell M Scheiman; David R Stager; David K Wallace Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Jonathan M Holmes; Raymond T Kraker; Roy W Beck; Eileen E Birch; Susan A Cotter; Donald F Everett; Richard W Hertle; Graham E Quinn; Michael X Repka; Mitchell M Scheiman; David K Wallace Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Catherine E Stewart; Merrick J Moseley; David A Stephens; Alistair R Fielder Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.799