| Literature DB >> 24966797 |
Teresa Bronisława Pop1, Bożenna Karczmarek-Borowska2, Monika Tymczak1, Ireneusz Hałas3, Joanna Banaś1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Kinesiology Taping is a method that assists healing processes and improves the physical efficiency. THE AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of Kinesiology Taping on the lymphoedema reduction among women after mastectomy.Entities:
Keywords: Kinesiology Taping; lymphoedema; mastectomy
Year: 2014 PMID: 24966797 PMCID: PMC4068810 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2014.40644
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contemp Oncol (Pozn) ISSN: 1428-2526
Comparison of age and somatic features
| Examined feature | Study group | Clinical control group |
|---|---|---|
| age | ‘x = 63 | ‘x = 61 |
| height | ‘x = 165 cm | ‘x = 167 cm |
| weight | ‘x = 68 kg | ‘x = 71 kg |
|
|
Student's t-test
Methods of treatment. Assessment of the lymphoedema
| Examined feature | Study group (number of subjects) | Clinical control group (number of subjects) |
|---|---|---|
| radical surgery | 13 | 15 |
| breast conserving therapy | 9 | 7 |
| radiotherapy | 9 | 7 |
| 1st degree of lymph oedema | 17 | 15 |
| 2nd degree of lymph oedema | 5 | 7 |
Fig. 1Self-made measuring apparatus
Fig. 2The own method of taping
Subjective assessment of therapeutic effects
| Subjective assessment of therapeutic effects | Study group | Clinical control group |
|---|---|---|
| bad | 0 | 0 |
| moderate | 3 | 9 |
| good | 9 | 9 |
| very good | 10 | 4 |
Assessment of lymphoedema reduction
| Average reduction in the volume of lymphoedema | Study group | Clinical control group |
|---|---|---|
| examination I | 0% | 0% |
| examination II | 32% | 18% |
| examination III | 42% | 23% |
| examination IV | 55% | 27% |
|
| ||
|
|
Student's t-test
ANOVA test
Grip strength
| Grip strength [kg] | Study group | Clinical control group |
|---|---|---|
| examination I | 14 | 13 |
| examination II | 19 | 16 |
| examination III | 20 | 16 |
| examination IV | 22 | 18 |
|
| ||
|
|
Student's t-test
ANOVA test
Improvement in range of motion in the shoulder and glenohumeral joint
| Motion | Study group | Clinical control group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| flexion in the sagittal plane | examination I | 155° | 150° |
| examination II | 160° | 160° | |
| examination III | 170° | 170° | |
| examination IV | 175° | 170° | |
| therapy effect | 20° | 20° | |
| extension in the sagittal plane | examination I | 20° | 20° |
| examination II | 30° | 25° | |
| examination III | 40° | 30° | |
| examination IV | 40° | 30° | |
| therapy effect | 20° | 10° | |
| abduction in the frontal plane | examination I | 150° | 150° |
| examination II | 160° | 155° | |
| examination III | 165° | 160° | |
| examination IV | 170° | 170° | |
| therapy effect | 20° | 20° | |
| flexion in the horizontal plane | examination I | 110° | 110° |
| examination II | 120° | 110° | |
| examination III | 120° | 110° | |
| examination IV | 120° | 120° | |
| therapy effect | 10° | 10° | |
| extension in the horizontal plane | examination I | 20° | 20° |
| examination II | 30° | 20° | |
| examination III | 30° | 20° | |
| examination IV | 30° | 25° | |
| therapy effect | 10° | 5° | |
| outside rotation (F90) | examination I | 50° | 50° |
| examination II | 65° | 50° | |
| examination III | 70° | 55° | |
| examination IV | 75° | 60° | |
| therapy effect | 25° | 10° |
Student's t-test – p < 0.001, ANOVA test – p < 0.001