Literature DB >> 24966574

Craniomapper for accurate localization of lesion during craniotomy: How much benefit does it have over anatomical marking? Report of two cases.

Pralaya Kishore Nayak1, Jawhar Dutta1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24966574      PMCID: PMC4064201          DOI: 10.4103/0976-3147.131692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract        ISSN: 0976-3155


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, Localizing smaller lesions in the brain while marking for craniotomy is, sometimes, a difficult and cumbersome task. At times we miss the margin by a few millimeters, which lead to the use of brain retraction and/or bone resection. This is particularly true in high convexity areas where the landmarks are obscured and reference bony points are far. Further, the use of a stereotactic frame or Neuronavigation is not available widely in India. This is particularly applied where precise craniotomy is required, may it be routine or emergency surgery where wide craniotomy is not desired. The author used a special frame designed to surface mark the lesion during computed tomography (CT) scanning of the brain, particularly in lesions located near the eloquent area. The more precise localization provided thereby facilitated planning and performance of surgery.[1] Craniomapper (Surgiwear, India) is an external plastic frame embedded with radio opaque markers placed around the patient head during CT scanning. The vertical and horizontal lines of the frame serve as a guide to a particular site. A CT topogram is superimposed over the frame. The radioopaque markers are visible on an axial plane, from the anterior to the posterior direction. Any particular axial section of interest is marked by laser light inside the gantry, and the distance from the midline is counted following the markers. Then, the most target part is outlined by a permanent marker pen [Figure 1]. It accurately provides a 2D plane, whereas a 3D plane cannot be exactly defined as in the image guidance system.
Figure 1

Craniomapper with axial marker computed tomography

Craniomapper with axial marker computed tomography The author tried the use of Craniomapper in two patients with high parietal convexity spontaneous bleed. The patients were properly investigated prior to emergency surgery. Both were conscious with neurologically mild motor deficit. CT brain showed localized superficial bleed with less brain edema. To locate the bleed precisely and to avoid brain retraction, we decided to use the external frame as wide craniotomy was not indicated in these patients. The difficulty of localization of the small intracranial lesion on CT has been widely recognized by neurosurgeons. Experience may minimize the error, but the precise localization of high-convexity lesion still poses a considerable challenge.[2] CT, with its inherent accuracy in identifying and localizing intracranial lesions, has been adapted by several groups for use in stereotactic neurosurgical procedures.[3] Frame-based stereotactic systems provide valuable localization information for the performance of neurosurgical procedures.[4] Marking of the skull prior to craniotomy on the basis of CT images can prove to be a difficult problem.[5] Conventional methods of preoperative localization include measurement and calculation from the baseline, such as orbito–meatal line, or obtaining a CT scan with a marker on the scalp.[6] However, easy and less-technical localization is mandatory in emergency surgery and small lesion in routine surgery, where such facilities are not available. A similar rapid, simple and inexpensive CT technique has been developed for marking the scalp and lateral skull radiograph of patients with small cerebral convexity lesions.[1] It is safe to use the frame and needs no special training. It is also not costly and can address the issue, where image guidance/stereotactic systems are not available. We need to try it with other small lesions like brain tumor and in a number of cases prior to judging its efficacy. It is helpful in localization of brain lesions in developing countries without high technical facilities.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Computer-assisted preoperative planning, interactive surgery, and frameless stereotaxy.

Authors:  B L Guthrie; J R Adler
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1992

2.  [Craniotomy for lesions in the cerebral convexity; how to precisely localize the lesions with conventional CT slices].

Authors:  A Ikeda; K Ito; K Matsuzawa; Y Tanaka; Y Miyazaki; I Yamamoto; O Sato
Journal:  No Shinkei Geka       Date:  1992-08

3.  Computed tomography-guided scalp marking of cerebral surface lesions; an alternative to stereotaxis for small convexity lesions.

Authors:  G H Spincemaille; C W Versteege; G Blaauw
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  An overview of CT based stereotactic systems for the localization of intracranial lesions.

Authors:  G Alker; P J Kelly
Journal:  Comput Radiol       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug

5.  Intracranial lesion localisation: a simple method using CT scanning.

Authors:  N I Azzam
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Scalp markers for precise craniotomy siting, using computed tomography.

Authors:  L A Hayman; R A Evans; V C Hinck
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 1.826

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  One of nature's basic rules: The simpler the better-why this is also valid for neuronavigation.

Authors:  Lennart Henning Stieglitz
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2014-04

2.  HeaDax: A simple pre-surgical procedure for localizing superficial brain lesions in resource-limited environments.

Authors:  Ali Akhaddar
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-12-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.