Literature DB >> 24966312

Synchronous dynamics of zooplankton competitors prevail in temperate lake ecosystems.

David A Vasseur1, Jeremy W Fox2, Andrew Gonzalez3, Rita Adrian4, Beatrix E Beisner5, Matthew R Helmus6, Catherine Johnson7, Pavel Kratina8, Colin Kremer9, Claire de Mazancourt10, Elizabeth Miller9, William A Nelson11, Michael Paterson12, James A Rusak13, Jonathan B Shurin14, Christopher F Steiner15.   

Abstract

Although competing species are expected to exhibit compensatory dynamics (negative temporal covariation), empirical work has demonstrated that competitive communities often exhibit synchronous dynamics (positive temporal covariation). This has led to the suggestion that environmental forcing dominates species dynamics; however, synchronous and compensatory dynamics may appear at different length scales and/or at different times, making it challenging to identify their relative importance. We compiled 58 long-term datasets of zooplankton abundance in north-temperate and sub-tropical lakes and used wavelet analysis to quantify general patterns in the times and scales at which synchronous/compensatory dynamics dominated zooplankton communities in different regions and across the entire dataset. Synchronous dynamics were far more prevalent at all scales and times and were ubiquitous at the annual scale. Although we found compensatory dynamics in approximately 14% of all combinations of time period/scale/lake, there were no consistent scales or time periods during which compensatory dynamics were apparent across different regions. Our results suggest that the processes driving compensatory dynamics may be local in their extent, while those generating synchronous dynamics operate at much larger scales. This highlights an important gap in our understanding of the interaction between environmental and biotic forces that structure communities.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  compensatory dynamics; synchrony; wavelet; zooplankton

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24966312      PMCID: PMC4083788          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  15 in total

1.  Stability and variability in competitive communities.

Authors:  A R Ives; K Gross; J L Klug
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Detection of scale-specific community dynamics using wavelets.

Authors:  Timothy H Keitt; Janet Fischer
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization.

Authors:  Julian D Olden; N Leroy Poff; Marlis R Douglas; Michael E Douglas; Kurt D Fausch
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Rising variance: a leading indicator of ecological transition.

Authors:  S R Carpenter; W A Brock
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Compensatory dynamics are rare in natural ecological communities.

Authors:  J E Houlahan; D J Currie; K Cottenie; G S Cumming; S K M Ernest; C S Findlay; S D Fuhlendorf; U Gaedke; P Legendre; J J Magnuson; B H McArdle; E H Muldavin; D Noble; R Russell; R D Stevens; T J Willis; I P Woiwod; S M Wondzell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Spectral analysis unmasks synchronous and compensatory dynamics in plankton communities.

Authors:  David A Vasseur; Ursula Gaedke
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Relaxing the zero-sum assumption in neutral biodiversity theory.

Authors:  Bart Haegeman; Rampal S Etienne
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Environmental stability and lake zooplankton diversity - contrasting effects of chemical and thermal variability.

Authors:  Jonathan B Shurin; Monika Winder; Rita Adrian; Wendel Bill Keller; Blake Matthews; Andrew M Paterson; Michael J Paterson; Bernadette Pinel-Alloul; James A Rusak; Norman D Yan
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 9.  Anticipating critical transitions.

Authors:  Marten Scheffer; Stephen R Carpenter; Timothy M Lenton; Jordi Bascompte; William Brock; Vasilis Dakos; Johan van de Koppel; Ingrid A van de Leemput; Simon A Levin; Egbert H van Nes; Mercedes Pascual; John Vandermeer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Biodiversity and ecosystem stability: a synthesis of underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Michel Loreau; Claire de Mazancourt
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 9.492

View more
  7 in total

1.  Rapid eco-evolutionary responses in perturbed phytoplankton communities.

Authors:  Geneviève Thibodeau; David A Walsh; Beatrix E Beisner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Energy flow and functional compensation in Great Basin small mammals under natural and anthropogenic environmental change.

Authors:  Rebecca C Terry; Rebecca J Rowe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Looking for compensation at multiple scales in a wetland bird community.

Authors:  Frédéric Barraquand; Coralie Picoche; Christelle Aluome; Laure Carassou; Claude Feigné
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Limited evidence for sardine and anchovy asynchrony: re-examining an old story.

Authors:  Margaret C Siple; Timothy E Essington; Lewis A K Barnett; Mark D Scheuerell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Disturbance and nutrients synchronise kelp forests across scales through interacting Moran effects.

Authors:  Max C N Castorani; Tom W Bell; Jonathan A Walter; Daniel C Reuman; Kyle C Cavanaugh; Lawrence W Sheppard
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 11.274

Review 6.  The long and the short of it: Mechanisms of synchronous and compensatory dynamics across temporal scales.

Authors:  Lauren G Shoemaker; Lauren M Hallett; Lei Zhao; Daniel C Reuman; Shaopeng Wang; Kathryn L Cottingham; Richard J Hobbs; Max C N Castorani; Amy L Downing; Joan C Dudney; Samuel B Fey; Laureano A Gherardi; Nina Lany; Cristina Portales-Reyes; Andrew L Rypel; Lawrence W Sheppard; Jonathan A Walter; Katharine N Suding
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 6.431

7.  Stochastic disturbance regimes alter patterns of ecosystem variability and recovery.

Authors:  Jennifer M Fraterrigo; Aaron B Langille; James A Rusak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.