Aaron R Casha1, Alexander Manché2, Ruben Gatt3, Edward Duca3, Marilyn Gauci4, Pierre Schembri-Wismayer5, Marie-Therese Camilleri-Podesta5, Joseph N Grima3. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta Department of Anatomy, University of Malta, Msida, Malta aaron.casha@um.edu.mt. 2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta. 3. Metamaterials Unit, Faculty of Science, University of Malta, Msida, Malta. 4. Department of Anaesthesia, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta. 5. Department of Anatomy, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Biomechanical modelling of the forces acting on a median sternotomy can explain the mechanism of sternotomy dehiscence, leading to improved closure techniques. METHODS: Chest wall forces on 40 kPa coughing were measured using a novel finite element analysis (FEA) ellipsoid chest model, based on average measurements of eight adult male thoracic computerized tomography (CT) scans, with Pearson's correlation coefficient used to assess the anatomical accuracy. Another FEA model was constructed representing the barrel chest of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Six, seven and eight trans-sternal and figure-of-eight closures were tested against both FEA models. RESULTS: Comparison between chest wall measurements from CT data and the normal ellipsoid FEA model showed an accurate fit (P < 0.001, correlation coefficients: coronal r = 0.998, sagittal r = 0.991). Coughing caused rotational moments of 92 Nm, pivoting at the suprasternal notch for the normal FEA model, rising to 118 Nm in the COPD model (t-test, P < 0.001). The threshold for dehiscence was 84 Nm with a six-sternal-wire closure, 107 Nm with seven wires, 127 Nm with eight wires and 71 Nm for three figure-of-eights. CONCLUSIONS: The normal rib cage closely fits the ellipsoid FEA model. Lateral chest wall forces were significantly higher in the barrel-shaped chest. Rotational moments generated by forces acting on a six-sternal-wire closure at the suprasternal notch were sufficient to cause lateral distraction pivoting at the top of the manubrium. The six-sternal-wire closure may be successfully enhanced by the addition of one or two extra wires at the lower end of the sternotomy, depending on chest wall shape.
OBJECTIVES: Biomechanical modelling of the forces acting on a median sternotomy can explain the mechanism of sternotomy dehiscence, leading to improved closure techniques. METHODS: Chest wall forces on 40 kPa coughing were measured using a novel finite element analysis (FEA) ellipsoid chest model, based on average measurements of eight adult male thoracic computerized tomography (CT) scans, with Pearson's correlation coefficient used to assess the anatomical accuracy. Another FEA model was constructed representing the barrel chest of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Six, seven and eight trans-sternal and figure-of-eight closures were tested against both FEA models. RESULTS: Comparison between chest wall measurements from CT data and the normal ellipsoid FEA model showed an accurate fit (P < 0.001, correlation coefficients: coronal r = 0.998, sagittal r = 0.991). Coughing caused rotational moments of 92 Nm, pivoting at the suprasternal notch for the normal FEA model, rising to 118 Nm in the COPD model (t-test, P < 0.001). The threshold for dehiscence was 84 Nm with a six-sternal-wire closure, 107 Nm with seven wires, 127 Nm with eight wires and 71 Nm for three figure-of-eights. CONCLUSIONS: The normal rib cage closely fits the ellipsoid FEA model. Lateral chest wall forces were significantly higher in the barrel-shaped chest. Rotational moments generated by forces acting on a six-sternal-wire closure at the suprasternal notch were sufficient to cause lateral distraction pivoting at the top of the manubrium. The six-sternal-wire closure may be successfully enhanced by the addition of one or two extra wires at the lower end of the sternotomy, depending on chest wall shape.
Authors: Joel Aissa; Johannes Boos; Lino Morris Sawicki; Niklas Heinzler; Karl Krzymyk; Martin Sedlmair; Patric Kröpil; Gerald Antoch; Christoph Thomas Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Changhong Wang; Rahul Goel; Maria Noun; Ravi K Ghanta; Bijan Najafi Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Eva Diephuis; Corianne de Borgie; Anton Tomšič; Jacobus Winkelman; Wim Jan van Boven; Berto Bouma; Susanne Eberl; Nicole Juffermans; Marcus Schultz; Jose P Henriques; David Koolbergen Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2020-04-25 Impact factor: 8.143