Literature DB >> 24965816

Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care.

Mary J Renfrew1, Alison McFadden2, Maria Helena Bastos3, James Campbell4, Andrew Amos Channon5, Ngai Fen Cheung6, Deborah Rachel Audebert Delage Silva7, Soo Downe8, Holly Powell Kennedy9, Address Malata10, Felicia McCormick11, Laura Wick12, Eugene Declercq13.   

Abstract

In this first paper in a series of four papers on midwifery, we aimed to examine, comprehensively and systematically, the contribution midwifery can make to the quality of care of women and infants globally, and the role of midwives and others in providing midwifery care. Drawing on international definitions and current practice, we mapped the scope of midwifery. We then developed a framework for quality maternal and newborn care using a mixed-methods approach including synthesis of findings from systematic reviews of women's views and experiences, effective practices, and maternal and newborn care providers. The framework differentiates between what care is provided and how and by whom it is provided, and describes the care and services that childbearing women and newborn infants need in all settings. We identified more than 50 short-term, medium-term, and long-term outcomes that could be improved by care within the scope of midwifery; reduced maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity, reduced stillbirth and preterm birth, decreased number of unnecessary interventions, and improved psychosocial and public health outcomes. Midwifery was associated with more efficient use of resources and improved outcomes when provided by midwives who were educated, trained, licensed, and regulated. Our findings support a system-level shift from maternal and newborn care focused on identification and treatment of pathology for the minority to skilled care for all. This change includes preventive and supportive care that works to strengthen women's capabilities in the context of respectful relationships, is tailored to their needs, focuses on promotion of normal reproductive processes, and in which first-line management of complications and accessible emergency treatment are provided when needed. Midwifery is pivotal to this approach, which requires effective interdisciplinary teamwork and integration across facility and community settings. Future planning for maternal and newborn care systems can benefit from using the quality framework in planning workforce development and resource allocation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24965816     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  195 in total

1.  Inequality and Innovation: Barriers and Facilitators to 17P Administration to Prevent Preterm Birth among Medicaid Participants.

Authors:  Caitlin Cross-Barnet; Sarah Benatar; Brigette Courtot; Ian Hill; Emily Johnston; Morgan Cheeks
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-11

Review 2.  The Causal Inference Framework: A Primer on Concepts and Methods for Improving the Study of Well-Woman Childbearing Processes.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Walking Together: Towards a Collaborative Model for Maternal Health Care in Pastoralist Communities of Laikipia and Samburu, Kenya.

Authors:  Michelle Kermode; Alison Morgan; Josephat Nyagero; Florence Nderitu; Tanya Caulfield; Matthew Reeve; John Nduba
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-10

Review 4.  Group versus conventional antenatal care for women.

Authors:  Christine J Catling; Nancy Medley; Maralyn Foureur; Clare Ryan; Nicky Leap; Alison Teate; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-04

5.  Continuing Professional Development in Maternal Health Care: Barriers to Applying New Knowledge and Skills in the Hospitals of Rwanda.

Authors:  Germaine Tuyisenge; Celestin Hategeka; Isaac Luginaah; Yolanda Babenko-Mould; David Cechetto; Stephen Rulisa
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-08

6.  Planned Out-of-Hospital Birth and Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Jonathan M Snowden; Ellen L Tilden; Janice Snyder; Brian Quigley; Aaron B Caughey; Yvonne W Cheng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Parturition and the perinatal period: can mode of delivery impact on the future health of the neonate?

Authors:  R M Tribe; P D Taylor; N M Kelly; D Rees; J Sandall; H P Kennedy
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Nature and scope of certified nurse-midwifery practice: A workforce study.

Authors:  Marie Hastings-Tolsma; Sarah Wilcox Foster; Mary C Brucker; Priscilla Nodine; Rebecca Burpo; Barbara Camune; Jackie Griggs; Tiffany J Callahan
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.036

9.  The Effect of Client Needs Counseling on the Postpartum Quality of Life of Women.

Authors:  Mina Esmkhani; Leila Ahmadi; Azam Maleki
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2020-04-01

10.  Strengthening Midwifery to End Preventable Maternal, Child, and Newborn Deaths.

Authors:  Jody R Lori; Suzanne Stalls; Sarah D Rominski
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.