Literature DB >> 24965716

Analysis of warning letters issued by the US Food and Drug Administration to clinical investigators, institutional review boards and sponsors: a retrospective study.

Yashashri C Shetty1, Aafreen A Saiyed1.   

Abstract

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issues warning letters to all research stakeholders if unacceptable deficiencies are found during site visits. Warning letters issued by the FDA between January 2011 and December 2012 to clinical investigators and institutional review boards (IRBs) were reviewed for various violation themes and compared to similar studies in the past. Warning letters issued to sponsors between January 2005 and December 2012 were analysed for the first time for a specific set of violations using descriptive statistics. Failure to protect subject safety and to report adverse events to IRBs was found to be significant compared to prior studies for clinical investigators, while failure to follow standard operating procedures and maintain documentation was noted as significant in warning letters to IRBs. Failure to maintain minutes of meeting and to follow written procedures for continuing review were new substantial violations in warning letters issued to IRBs. Forty-six warning letters were issued to sponsors, the most common violations being failure to follow a monitoring schedule (58.69%), failure to obtain investigator agreement (34.78%), failure to secure investigators' compliance (30.43%), and failure to maintain data records and ship documents to investigators (30.43%). Appropriate methods for handling clinical trial procedural violations should be developed and implemented worldwide. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical Trials; Ethics Committees/Consultation; Informed Consent; Legal Aspects; Research Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24965716     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  4 in total

1.  Data Integrity in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Analysis of Inspections and Warning Letters Issued by the Bioresearch Monitoring Program Between Fiscal Years 2007-2018.

Authors:  Clinton A Rogers; Jennifer D Ahearn; Michael G Bartlett
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 1.778

2.  Design, implementation, and evaluation of PINDAR, a novel short program on GCP for academic medical center principal investigators conducting human subject research.

Authors:  Claudia S Plottel; Lois Mannon; Frederick G More; Stuart D Katz; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2018-12

3.  An Audit of Protocol Deviations Submitted to an Institutional Ethics Committee of a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Sharmila V Jalgaonkar; Shruti S Bhide; Raakhi K Tripathi; Yashashri C Shetty; Padmaja A Marathe; Janhavi Katkar; Urmila M Thatte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A comparative study to evaluate quality of data documentation between investigator-initiated and pharmaceutical industry-sponsored studies.

Authors:  Brinal H Figer; Keyur P Sapra; Nithya J Gogtay; Urmila M Thatte
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2019-05-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.