Literature DB >> 24965190

Changes in quality of life after epilepsy surgery: the role of reprioritization response shift.

Tolulope T Sajobi1, Kirsten M Fiest, Samuel Wiebe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important indicator of well-being in patients with epilepsy. When assessing changes in HRQOL over time, some of the changes observed may be due to the patients' change in the internal standards, value, or meaning that they attribute to the HRQOL domain being measured, rather than actual change, a phenomenon known as response shift. Response shifts are increasingly recognized as an important explanation for the seemingly paradoxical or counterintuitive HRQOL results often observed in chronic conditions. We investigated the presence of changing values (reprioritization response shift) in data from a surgical randomized controlled trial of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).
METHODS: Eighty patients with TLE, who were randomized to surgical and medical treatment, provided data on the epilepsy-specific 31-item Quality of life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31) questionnaire at baseline and 1 year after randomization. Reprioritization response shift among the seven QOLIE-31 domains was assessed using changes in the relative importance weights derived from logistic regression and discriminant analysis.
RESULTS: The relative importance analysis showed a statistically significant increase over time in the importance of social function, but a significant decrease in the relative importance of seizure worry. There were no significant changes in the relative importance of the remaining five domains in distinguishing between surgical and medical group over time. SIGNIFICANCE: Patients that receive surgical treatment are more likely to experience a decrease in the valuation of seizure worry and an increase in the value of social function as compared to patients who are medically treated. Changes in expectation about seizure freedom and social function may confound the assessment of longitudinal change on these outcomes, and highlight the importance of assessing response shift and the limitations of assessing HRQOL at a single point in time or without a control group. A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section here. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
© 2014 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epilepsy surgery; Quality of life; Randomized controlled trial; Response shift

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24965190     DOI: 10.1111/epi.12697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  8 in total

1.  Do patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy shift their quality of life priorities after having surgery?

Authors:  Alison M Pack
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 7.500

Review 2.  Scoping review of response shift methods: current reporting practices and recommendations.

Authors:  Tolulope T Sajobi; Ronak Brahmbatt; Lisa M Lix; Bruno D Zumbo; Richard Sawatzky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Social Participation of Burn Survivors and the General Population in Work and Employment: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Profile Study.

Authors:  Cayla J Saret; Pengsheng Ni; Molly Marino; Emily Dore; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 1.819

4.  Using classification and regression tree modelling to investigate response shift patterns in dentine hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Carolina Machuca; Mario V Vettore; Marta Krasuska; Sarah R Baker; Peter G Robinson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Response-shift effects in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a secondary analysis of clinical trial data.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Roland B Stark; Brian D Stucky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Detection of response shift in health-related quality of life studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Estelina Ortega-Gómez; Purificación Vicente-Galindo; Helena Martín-Rodero; Purificación Galindo-Villardón
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Listening to the elephant in the room: response-shift effects in clinical trials research.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; I-Chan Huang; Gudrun Rohde; Richard L Skolasky
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2022-09-30

8.  Implications of response shift for micro-, meso-, and macro-level healthcare decision-making using results of patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Richard Sawatzky; Jae-Yung Kwon; Ruth Barclay; Cynthia Chauhan; Lori Frank; Wilbert B van den Hout; Lene Kongsgaard Nielsen; Sandra Nolte; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.147

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.