| Literature DB >> 2496513 |
E Muñoz1, S Wilkins, E Mallet, J Goldstein, H Sterman, L Wise.
Abstract
The Diagnostic Related Group (DRG) hospital payment system may be inequitable for certain groups of Medicare patients. This study of 216 Medicare urology patients in the ten non-age stratified urology DRGs demonstrated that patients seventy years of age and older (70+) had higher resource consumption than patients under seventy years of age (70-). Findings were: (1) older patients (70+) had higher total hospital costs (+12,022 per patient) than younger patients (70-) (+9,872 per patient); (2) a longer hospital length of stay (14.2 days vs 11.6 days); (3) financial risk of +1,756 loss per (70+) patient vs +1,309 profit per (70-) patient (p less than 0.05); (4) more diagnoses and procedures per patient, and (5) a higher mortality (4.0% vs 3.3%). These findings suggest that the current DRG scheme may be inequitable vis-a-vis the older urology patient in non-age stratified DRGs, and thus could limit access and quality of care for these patients in the future.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1989 PMID: 2496513 DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(89)90048-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Urology ISSN: 0090-4295 Impact factor: 2.649