Literature DB >> 24965117

Bayesian semiparametric regression in the presence of conditionally heteroscedastic measurement and regression errors.

Abhra Sarkar1, Bani K Mallick, Raymond J Carroll.   

Abstract

We consider the problem of robust estimation of the regression relationship between a response and a covariate based on sample in which precise measurements on the covariate are not available but error-prone surrogates for the unobserved covariate are available for each sampled unit. Existing methods often make restrictive and unrealistic assumptions about the density of the covariate and the densities of the regression and the measurement errors, for example, normality and, for the latter two, also homoscedasticity and thus independence from the covariate. In this article we describe Bayesian semiparametric methodology based on mixtures of B-splines and mixtures induced by Dirichlet processes that relaxes these restrictive assumptions. In particular, our models for the aforementioned densities adapt to asymmetry, heavy tails and multimodality. The models for the densities of regression and measurement errors also accommodate conditional heteroscedasticity. In simulation experiments, our method vastly outperforms existing methods. We apply our method to data from nutritional epidemiology.
© 2014, The International Biometric Society.

Keywords:  B-splines; Conditional heteroscedasticity; Dirichlet process mixture models; Measurement errors; Regression with errors in covariates; Variance functions

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24965117     DOI: 10.1111/biom.12197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  4 in total

1.  Semiparametric regression for measurement error model with heteroscedastic error.

Authors:  Mengyan Li; Yanyuan Ma; Runze Li
Journal:  J Multivar Anal       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 1.473

2.  STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 2-More complex methods of adjustment and advanced topics.

Authors:  Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Ruth H Keogh; Victor Kipnis; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Helmut Küchenhoff; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Efficient odds ratio estimation under two-phase sampling using error-prone data from a multi-national HIV research cohort.

Authors:  Sarah C Lotspeich; Bryan E Shepherd; Gustavo G C Amorim; Pamela A Shaw; Ran Tao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Modeling energy balance while correcting for measurement error via free knot splines.

Authors:  Daniel Ries; Alicia Carriquiry; Robin Shook
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.