Literature DB >> 24965071

Gamma Knife radiosurgery for brainstem cavernous malformations: should a patient wait for the rebleed?

Sung Ho Lee1, Hyuk Jai Choi, Hee Sup Shin, Seok Keun Choi, In Ho Oh, Young Jin Lim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for cavernous malformation (CM) has not been fully assessed. Consequently, observation is usually recommended when a bleeding CM is initially discovered. Recurrent bleeding occurs with CMs, and these repeat hemorrhages can result in additional morbidity.
METHODS: From 1992 to 2011, 49 patients with brainstem CMs were treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS). We classified patients into two groups: Group A (n = 31), patients who underwent GKS for a CM following a single symptomatic bleed, and group B (n = 18), patients who underwent GKS for a CM following two or more symptomatic bleeds. The mean marginal dose of radiation was 13.1 Gy (range 9.0-16.8 Gy): 12.8 Gy in group A and 13.7 Gy in group B. The mean follow-up period was 64.0 months (range 1-171 months).
RESULTS: In group A, the annual hemorrhage rate (AHR) following GKS was 7.06 % within the first 2 years and 2.03 % after 2 years. In group B, four patients (22.2 %) developed new or worsening neurologic deterioration as a result of repeat hemorrhages. In group B, the AHR was 38.36 % prior to GKS, 9.84 % within the first two years, and 1.50 % after two years. There was no statistically significant difference in the AHRs at each follow-up period after GKS between the two groups. Adverse radiation effects (AREs) developed in a total of four patients (8.2 %); among them, one patient (2.0 %) developed a permanent case of diplopia. No mortality occurred in this series.
CONCLUSION: In this study, GKS was demonstrated to be a safe and effective alternative treatment for brain stem CMs that resulted in a reduction in the AHR. Consequently, we suggest that even CM patients who have suffered only a single bleed should not be contraindicated for SRS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24965071     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-014-2155-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  5 in total

1.  [Cavernomas of the central nervous system : Observational study of 111 patients].

Authors:  C Mayer; U M Mauer; G Bluhm; R Mathieu; C Hackenbroch; S Mayer
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  Cavernous angiomas: deconstructing a neurosurgical disease.

Authors:  Issam A Awad; Sean P Polster
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 3.  Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Pathogenesis: Investigating Lesion Formation and Progression with Animal Models.

Authors:  Chelsea M Phillips; Svetlana M Stamatovic; Richard F Keep; Anuska V Andjelkovic
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 4.  Management of cerebral cavernous malformations: from diagnosis to treatment.

Authors:  Nikolaos Mouchtouris; Nohra Chalouhi; Ameet Chitale; Robert M Starke; Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris; Robert H Rosenwasser; Pascal M Jabbour
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-01-05

Review 5.  Synopsis of Guidelines for the Clinical Management of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations: Consensus Recommendations Based on Systematic Literature Review by the Angioma Alliance Scientific Advisory Board Clinical Experts Panel.

Authors:  Amy Akers; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Issam A Awad; Kristen Dahlem; Kelly Flemming; Blaine Hart; Helen Kim; Ignacio Jusue-Torres; Douglas Kondziolka; Cornelia Lee; Leslie Morrison; Daniele Rigamonti; Tania Rebeiz; Elisabeth Tournier-Lasserve; Darrel Waggoner; Kevin Whitehead
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.654

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.